User talk:LineJø

Welcome!

Hello, LineJø, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to CSM București (women's handball). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LineJø. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to CSM București (women's handball), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CSM, CSM, CSM!

You wrote really well, and I have really appreciated your work, just some small brushes from me. :) Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and we should follow some patterns. I was previously told. Cristina neagu (talk) 00:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

This edit summary is unacceptable. If you attack another user or threaten retaliation on other articles again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of other editors. -- Cristina neagu ^talk 20:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rationament

Zevzeaco, nu ma mai fa retardat! Si acum iti voi explica rationamentul, pentru ca inainte eu asa editasem. Rostov nu mai exista pe harta, in opinia caselor de pariuri, dar si in opinia multora pentru ca au pierdut cele mai bune jucatoare si multe. Asa ca ce preferi, top 2 sau top 5 sau top 10? Se poate subintelege ca ar fi in top 10 de exemplu, nu in top 2. Iar intre CSM si ETO nu poti face diferentierea baneasca. Acum se intelege? -- Cristina neagu ^talk 21:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daca aveam si o astfel de pagina Deloitte Football Money League in handbal, ziceam "highest ranked" sau "the second highest ranked team" (in cazul lor e putin diferit pe aceasta pagina). Nu e logic ca e mai important sa se faca diferenta clara intre top 2 sau top 10 sau top 15 de exemplu chiar, pentru necunoscatori? E "extrapolare" dar e una foarte corecta (mai ales ca o echipa din Romania rareori e considerata atat de buna; la o prima privire, pana la Record). Intrucat: in sezonul trecut Rostov era acolo cu Gyor si CSM, ba cred ca si peste noi la capitolul "favoriti" dar sezonul acesta. Gyor 2.20, CSM 2.60, Rostov 8.50, Buducnos 41.00. Nu e logic ca au cele mai bune loturi? Plus ca acum cunoastem si noi acest aspect. Tu tii sa te impui si peste profesori, aici e buba. Si dai cu capul! -- Cristina neagu ^talk 21:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Se zice "get a life"! :)) Nu take a life. Dancila, tu esti? (photo) :D -- Cristina neagu ^talk 21:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LineJø. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]