User talk:Lifeisshubh

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

Block evasion

I have reset the time on your block to 1 week from now due to your checkuser Confirmed block evasion.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} I am sorry so my behavior. I was trying what will happen. I was not aware of the policy. I have no intention of any bad edits or anything. So, it's my humble request to at least unblock my Ip since it is a NAT-gard public IP own by railtel, which means you are blocking 10,000 of users. Let by block stay. Thanks.

I didn't block the IP, it was automatically blocked when your sock account was blocked. No other editor has used that IP in several months, there is no concern about blocking "10,000 users" while the autoblock functions as intended.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I really appreciate what you are doing Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots}.

Courtesy notice - discretionary sanctions related to alt med and pseudoscience

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of One Fourth Labs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Fourth Labs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Fourth Labs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charlie (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]