User talk:Lichi.laaj

This is Lichi.laaj's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: On Melting Snow (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Some of the content is entirely unsourced. Where does the information in the "Production" section come from? This source does not verify all the content in the first two paragraphs. Please rewrite the introduction and the "Plot" section completely. They are very close paraphrases of the Film Fest Tucson source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:On Melting Snow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 18:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lichi.laaj! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 18:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: On Melting Snow (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:On Melting Snow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for your suggestions.

Although I'm a little confused as I used 3 official news channels and government sources to cite my draft with significant covergae on the film and 2 other sources as passing mentions.

Significant coverage-

1. https://culture.gov.az/en/heydar-aliyev/15786

2. https://en.apa.az/cop29/film-dedicated-to-cop29-dialogues-was-screened-450512

3. https://filmfesttucson.org/films/on-melting-snow/

Passing mentions-

1. https://www.azernews.az/nation/232838.html

2. https://suindependent.com/red-rock-film-festival-returns-in-september/

Can you please guide me little here please? Lichi.laaj (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: On Melting Snow (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NFILM and introduce sources accordingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:On Melting Snow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 14:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for your suggestions.

Although I'm a little confused as I used 3 official news channels and government sources to cite my draft with significant covergae on the film and 2 other sources as passing mentions.

Significant coverage-

1. https://culture.gov.az/en/heydar-aliyev/15786

2. https://en.apa.az/cop29/film-dedicated-to-cop29-dialogues-was-screened-450512

3. https://filmfesttucson.org/films/on-melting-snow/

Passing mentions-

1. https://www.azernews.az/nation/232838.html

2. https://suindependent.com/red-rock-film-festival-returns-in-september/

So despite the above sources coming from respective official agencies, they still don't qualify for Notability? Lichi.laaj (talk) 14:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rana Al-Qudsi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rana Al-Qudsi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 18:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mojtaba Bahadori moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mojtaba Bahadori, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TURKIDICAE🦃 20:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Melting Snow moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, On Melting Snow, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TURKIDICAE🦃 20:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Lichi.laaj, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lichi.laaj|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. TURKIDICAE🦃 20:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for the comment. I am new to this space so forgive my naivity.

To give you a background of my edits, I always wanted to learn to edit wikipedia articles as they provide a lot of value to the public. Being a budding filmmaker myself, I attended a film festival recently where Moj's film won the climate award. The film and the person both inspired me a lot that I took an interview with him and then started writing about it.

There is absolutely no financial matter involved in this. I'm solely doing this out of my experience of cinema, and would love to add more content as I find more cinematic masterpieces.

I do believe he and his film deserve to be out there.

If you still think there is any violation done from my side, please let me know, I would really like to learn and improve my future edits. And also if you can show me the right way to write about such people and films, as I tried my best to use notable news sources for the citations.

Looking forward. :) Lichi.laaj (talk) 21:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]