User talk:Librariegrrl

Welcome!

Hello, Librariegrrl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bastille (band). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Binksternet (talk) 23:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris "Woody" Wood (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Librariegrrl/Chris "Woody" Wood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 13:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 13:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Librariegrrl/Chris "Woody" Wood

Hello, Librariegrrl. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Chris "Woody" Wood".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

Thanks, JMHamo. I totally get why the article was rejected. If I knew how to delete it myself, I would.Librariegrrl (talk) 03:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bastille

Stop removing "Kill the Police - Destroy the System" from the Bastille page. It's a real single and Dan confirmed it is on the new album along with "Hangin'", "Snakes", and "Campus". --USAQuidditch (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@USAQuidditch - what is your source for this spurious information?!?

Wild World

Hey. Thanks for your additions to the Bastille page. I did a copyedit on them. In general we do not put the individual who produced most the band's records in the WP:LEDE, unless they are regarded as having been integral to the success of the group (i.e. George Martin). And this is backed up by the sources. The paragraph you included on the album release was very promotional. Details on the formats of the release go into the page for the album. It is likely that this will chart highly by the end of the week, so that it notable information that should be added. Hope that explains my edits. Karst (talk) 07:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

Thanks, Karst. (I hope this is the correct way to reply to you.) I think I understand why you made those changes. The reason that I added Mark Crew and I do believe that he is significant enough to mention on the main Bastille page is because he is credited on Wild World alongside the band itself under "Performed By" and actually gets more credits on Bad Blood, VS. and Wild World than any of the individual band members (besides Dan Smith) for writing, music, production, etc. I actually think he is highly significant to the band's success, but I understand if you disagree. Librariegrrl (talk) 03:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC) User:librariegrrl[reply]

If we can find an interview or article that explains Crew's role in more detail then, yes, he should be added. The point of the lede is to function as an introduction and at the moment there is no detailed mention of him. I looked at the NME interview again, and I don't think he was mentioned. Do you perhaps have the print version of that one? I would be helpful to perhaps start a section about Mark Crew on the Talk page of the band. Hope that helps.

Ok, thanks again. I totally value Wikipedia and your role in keeping everything well-cited. I do have the NME and DIY print editions, plus when I get my deluxe box set, I will have the documentary DVD as well. I hope those sources will clarify Mark Crew's role. He is definitely downplayed by Virgin Records and has stayed out of the "limelight", but he's literally all over the Credits and Royalties pages as playing a key role. I'm going to leave things "as is" until I condcut more thorough research. Again, thanks for your help as I am a real newbie at Wikipedia.Librariegrrl (talk) 01:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regional at Best cover.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Librariegrrl. You have new messages at [[User talk:TheLongTone#Regional at Best (album)[|TheLongTone's talk page]].
Message added 15:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TheLongTone (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Regional at Best cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Regional at Best cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My article that the image was attached to was deleted

I don’t understand why the article that I added for the Twenty One Pilots 2nd album discography was removed. It was entitled Regional at Best (album) and included reputable content and citations. It was deleted by @TheLongTone: who said in a Talkback that they left an explanation on my Talk Page. But I don’t see anything here. And I can’t get to the Talk page for my article because it was deleted.

I looked around for an explanation but I can’t find anything that makes sense. Apparently this is an ongoing issue that Wikipedia thinks Regional at Best is irrelevant even though it is basically the album that launched their career and included the precise content that got Fueled by Ramen to sign the band.

I am superconfused about why this article is not permitted to exist on Wikipedia.

Can anyone help explain? Librariegrrl (talk) 02:11, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Librariegrrl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Regional at Best (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regional at Best (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional at Best (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]