User talk:Libbycoifs

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Mercy NY people

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Mercy NY people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:32, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was neither repost nor identical

????

And why was this for if I may ask??? Lotje (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: They cut and paste it into a new article- WP:List of Mercy NY people but since this topic was done before- List of Mercy College (New York) alumni and deleted per this WP:Articles for deletion/List of Mercy College (New York) alumni, today's most recent creation was speedy deleted. Also- there is a strong chance this editor is a sock of a banned editor....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC

@Globalchamp: please refrain from mass deletion

What's your connection to Mercy College? You clearly have conflict of interest.Globalchamp (talk) 00:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an alum sir, but I wasn't knowingly vandalising. Simply updating. Could you please please please help update the article. I beg you sir. I will be eternally grateful. I will stop editwarring

July 2019

Your recent editing history at Mercy College (New York) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Contributor321 (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]