User talk:Liamd967

hi

Blarchmont Elementary School moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blarchmont Elementary School, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thingofme (talk) 01:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Trumpeter (disambiguation) and Wasp (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Don't list every article containing the title - partial title matches aren't ambiguous

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 22:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy Lake BC moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lazy Lake BC, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BE AMAZED

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BE AMAZED requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 08:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't done yet! Liamd967 (talk) 08:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Charr (disambiguation) because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:46, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Sylvari

Draft:Sylvari, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sylvari and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sylvari during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TNstingray (talk) 18:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Ice Monster moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Ice Monster, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Netherzone (talk) 02:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ice Monster (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Ice Monster and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 03:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Liamd967! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 03:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Ice Monster moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Ice Monster, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 05:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ice monster cover image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ice monster cover image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:20, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Liamd967! Your additions to The Midnight Gang have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Midnight Gang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Midnight Gang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Midnight Gang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ratburger cover image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ratburger cover image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Megamonster

The article Megamonster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable children's book that might have problems with copyright violations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Megamonster cover image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Megamonster cover image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"A good place to be" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect A good place to be has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 23 § A good place to be until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Ice Monster 2

Hello, Liamd967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Ice Monster 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Ice Monster

Hello, Liamd967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Ice Monster, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lift blog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lift blog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justi yaya 05:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lift blog moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lift blog. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Ice Monster

Hello, Liamd967. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Ice Monster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Wonka (soundtrack). Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so i can do it in an external links secion Liamd967 (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a link to a playlist of sorts, not a list of ~20 links. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You just added a massive table. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but i did it Liamd967 (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Scrub Scrub, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Oompa Loompa (Song), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you like my edit at at 04:18, February 17, 2024. then? Liamd967 (talk) 06:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liamd967 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know that copying lyrics is not allowed. Liamd967 (talk) 21:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

OK, so you do now. But just knowing that is not enough to get unblocked. Write a new request explaining in more detail how you will avoid copyright infringement in the future. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Grammarly Cite.png

Thank you for uploading File:Grammarly Cite.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Ice Monster 2

Hello, Liamd967. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Ice Monster 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liamd967 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please consider the following so that my account can be unbanned: 1 .I will refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Scrub Scrub and Lift blog, to Wikipedia. I read Wikipedia:Your first article and I would like to state this: "Our job is to summarize high-quality and published sources from other places, in the form of Wikipedia articles. That really is all we do!".

2. For the images that I upload, its usage would be: considered fair use in United States copyright law and also complies with the Non-free content criteria; It is used for a purpose that cannot be fulfilled by free material (text or images, existing or to be created); and It has a valid rationale indicating why its usage would be considered fair use within Wikipedia policy and U.S. law. Good examples include: File:Unifying.webp and File:Aulochrome.jpg. Please let know exactly what else I might need to add to this talk page. Feel free to change my indefinite block to a temporary block if needed.

Thanks, Liamd967

Liamd967 (talk) 22:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 06:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Aulochrome.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aulochrome.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2FA Tester for Liamd967

{{tld|sr-request |status =  |domain = global  |user name = Liamd967 }} <I just want to try this feature out. I am almost an extended user.>, thanks, --[[User:Liamd967|Liamd967]] ([[User talk:Liamd967#top|talk]]) 04:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

The proper place for requesting two-factor authentication permissions is M:Steward requests/Global permissions. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 16:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lift blog

Hello, Liamd967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lift blog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liamd967 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. It has been almost six months since my Wikipedia account has been blocked. Please read the unblock requests above to understand that my account should now be unblocked. I think the main reason that I am still blocked is because I created a sockpuppet account without reading the guidelines for Wikipedia. The second account I created was to help out and improve Wikipedia while I was still blocked. For the last couple months, I have been helping out on wikiHow almost every day because my Wikipedia account has been blocked. You can visit my wikiHow account at wiki.how/user:liamd. If you have any question about this request, please leave a message on my talk page below. Liamd967 (talk) 06:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's only been a month since you were caught evading your block as Wiki-inventor. You seem to think this was okay. It wasn't. WP:SO is probably your only option at this point. No sooner than six months from now, and only if you've made no further edits, make a new unblock request. At that point, you'll need to clearly demonstrate you understand how inappropriate it was to set up a new account. I'm also concerned with your understanding of copyright. Your prior request from March violated copyright. Yamla (talk) 11:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liamd967 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I know that I am blocked on Wikipedia since I keep violating copyright, but perhaps I might be able to start editing on Wiktionary. Due to it being a dictionary, I feel that it is harder to violate copyright. I feel that the inability to create copyright violations on Wiktionary will be helpful towards Wiktionary and my full unblock. Please check out my Wiktionary contributions and wikiHow account as I have made numerous good edits, including an article. Liamd967 (talk) 03:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't need to ask us if you want to edit other Wikimedia Foundation projects where you are not blocked. That said, avoiding the chance to make copyright violations doesn't convince us that you understand copyright violations or how to not make them in the future. 331dot (talk) 08:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.