User talk:LiamAiken

LiamAiken, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LiamAiken! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to CFC-Youth for Christ, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop. This article has been deleted after at AFD, and it was speedied after you created it yesterday. It does not appear to be notable. I have redirected it to the parent group. If you think this is notable enough to warrant an article please create a draft article and submit it for review. Meters (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you do create a draft you will need independent reliable sources to show its notability. Wikis are not acceptable, and the group's own pages are not acceptable. Meters (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LiamAiken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm being blocked by being a sockpuppet of anyone. As far as I know, It is a "Free" web-based content Encyclopedia so that anyone can contribute, recreate and create an existing topic about anything including current events, persons, animals, groups,....etc. Maybe the user linked to me, maybe we only have in common like being an active member/leader of a ministry that exists globally so it is possible we have a common interest about that.... Wikipedia said anyone can contribute to it so maybe others did the same using a different IPs or Username. ...maybe, using a public connection like what I did, may lead to sockpuppetry because of unpaid balance for a home internet connection. rather connecting to a beer house's free Wi-Fi downtown was the best option. (Just to make Wikipedia Literally Affordable to all users). Those possibilities may lead to that. and that is enough of being blocked or even compromised in all Wikis. Please help US understand how to use freely a "Free Encyclopedia" with many loopholes I think. LiamAiken (talk) 5:03 AM, August 19, 2017, Saturday (UTC)

Decline reason:

First, this request is pretty much incomprehensible and second, you already admitted you abused multiple accounts in your second unblock request here. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've revoked your talk page access. There's no reason why we need to waste our time reviewing your requests here when they are no more comprehensible or viable than the ones you made on your main talk page.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]