User talk:Liam-dino

October 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to United Airlines Flight 175 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: United Airlines Flight 175 was changed by Liam-dino (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86683 on 2014-10-14T22:08:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to A Rush of Blood to the Head, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United Airlines Flight 93 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<!-- All the links with the 7 crew members cited just before, except for LeRoy Homer Jr., return to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:34, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unnecessary, unsourced and off-topic detail to United Airlines Flight 93 article. Your edits have been reversed. If you need advice all experienced editors are here to help. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 10:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Air Transat Flight 236, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transatlantic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Roberts

Hello & thanks for your contributions. Do you have a verifiable source for your edit that Roberts has been released. The parole board decision on 24 October 2014, merely gave approval for his release at some date, at that time, yet to be confirmed. In the meantime, I'm afraid your edit will be removed until such time as a source can be confirmed. Thanks. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 21:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Theroadislong. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Theroadislong, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Mz7 (talk) 21:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who even are you, and why are you talking to me?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roast beef. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 12:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Liam-dino! Thank you for your contributions. I am DSCrowned and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DSCrowned^(talk) 23:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 21:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal opinions

Hi there, thanks for your contributions! Please don't add your personal opinions to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit. According to Wikipedia guidelines, we should maintain an encyclopedic tone in our articles. utcursch | talk 17:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, most people would agree with your opinion. But Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. You can post comments related to article improvement on the talk page of the article. But for your personal opinions, a blog or social media sites such as reddit are better places. utcursch | talk 18:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meghan Trainor. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to If You Say So. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chamith (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cory Monteith because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to David Cameron. Donner60 (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Air New Zealand Flight 901 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Kardashian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you are inserting material onto United Airlines Flight 93 which do not match the reference/sources. You have been warned before and if you continue you may be blocked, once again, from editing. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 1998— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Orphan Wiki 17:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Orphan Wiki with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistent disruptive editing despite previous blocks. I very nearly indefinitely blocked you until you could account for your behavior, but I've decided to give you one more chance, because not all of your edits are disruptive. If, after this block expires, you are able to stick to constructive editing, then you'll be fine. If you cannot, then your next block is likely to be indefinite.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please note that your recent edit summary was not very civil. Wikipedia requires that contributors be civil to make collaborating to build the encyclopedia possible. In future please use more polite edit summaries. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming here to say the same thing. I note that you've been blocked before. Seems that you've not learned from the experience. Suggest you do so pretty quickly otherwise you know what will happen. Mjroots (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Eduardofeld. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Alaska Airlines— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. E. Feld ^talk 21:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sweet Dreams (Beyoncé song). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 21:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Matthew Perry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yobol (talk) 14:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]