User talk:Lets Enjoy Life

Discuss-me-do.

Yoshiwara-juku

Thanks for your correction on Yoshiwara-juku (especially since you corrected my mistake). Feel free to look at all the post towns, because I'm sure I made mistakes on many of them. ;-) Douggers (talk) 01:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yui station exterior April 2008.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Hi Lets Enjoy Life!
We thank you for uploading Image:Yui station exterior April 2008.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

S-Line templates

Hi, it is great the work you are doing setting up these stations!

Do you need help setting up the s-line templates?

They really help navigation and fit in the infobox.

Also with most Japanese rail lines there is a line box with all the stations in (see Fukushima Station (Fukushima)

Lastly! (I must sound like a dragon! :) ) Grab the nihongo characters and pop them into Google Earth to get the coordinates of the station.

Seriously you have done some good work and it is appreciated.

An enthusiast! Cosnahang (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GReeeeN

I understand that Wikipedia articles should not be titled "RIP SLYME" or "abingdon boys school," but those both have either all capital letters or no capital letters. Band names such as "GReeeeN" and "Pay money To my Pain" have some capital letters and there is nothing in any manual of style (which is a guideline, not a policy) which states that the articles should be at a specific title just to fit in with standard English capitalization, when they have semi-standard capitalization.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is really an assumption of good faith, too.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 07:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And as it turns out, totally founded! You've wiped the conversation where your total non-argument was systematically picked apart until there was nothing left, and that speaks volumes. It's such a shame you were so dismissive and closed to compromise from the outset. Had you been willing to discuss the issue instead of knee-jerk reverting and enforcing what eventually turned out to be purely your own opinion on Wikipedia (in the face of well argued and totally valid opposition, I might add), we may have actually got somewhere. I can only hope you learn something from this episode, but the manner in which you just deleted the whole discussion with a curt "I'm done with this conversation" suggests anything but. So just to recap:

   * It's always written like that - Clearly untrue, as proved with multiple examples.
   * It's like eBay - Untrue. eBay and iPod are unique exceptions to the capitalisation rule.
   * It's not "GREEEEEN" or "greeeen" but "GReeeeN" and none of the relevant guidelines of style say it should be anywhere but "GReeeeN." - Untrue. I think we've establish that they all do.

These points all still stand up more than well enough, so expect further opposition in the future to your sweeping implementation of "it should be done this way because I say so" negotiating techniques.--Lets Enjoy Life (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN for Shimizu S-Pulse

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]