User talk:Leo Freeman

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Leo Freeman! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer 14:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Garni Crater has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Leo Freeman. Garni Crater, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 00:22, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Garni Crater

On 18 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Garni Crater, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Garni Crater (pictured), which provides evidence of liquid water on Mars, is named after a village in Armenia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Garni Crater. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:15, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Commagene

Hi there! How best to characterize the Kingdom of Commagene (i.e. was it Armenian, was it Hellenistic, was it Syrian) is a bit of a vexed issue. I've been trying to get a frank and open discussion going on this topic on the talk page for some while. Please feel free to weigh in with your perspectives there. Best regards, Q·L·1968 ☿ 04:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philippicus (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian dynasty

Hello, would you mind to explain your rollbacks on Macedonian dynasty? Because your addition looks to me a repeating of the "Origin" paragraph with the other origin claims (Slavic and Armeno-Slavonic) conveniently trimmed out in what seems an Armenian POV-pushing. Khruner (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative name of the "Macedonian Dynasty" is "Armenian Dynasty". It has a widely known academic usage, so first of all, it is about the alternative name, which must be put on the introduction paragraph. Leo Freeman (talk)

The article mentions only a single author, Mack Chahin, referring to it as "Armenian dynasty", so no, it isn't widely known at all: just mentioning it in the "Origin" section is more than enough. This issue clearly falls under WP:Undue weight. Khruner (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 19:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To name a few examples;

Adding "Armenian architecture" to the Ottoman architecture page without edit summary/sources.[1]
Adding "Armenian" in front of sourced content on the Mani (prophet) page,[2] even though the two sources make no mention of her being ethnically Armenian. The second part of the sentence says that she was from the Armenian Arsacid family of Kamsarakan. These Armenian Kamsarakans themselves are a branch of the Iranian Karen-Pahlav's; "Armenian noble family that was an offshoot of the Kāren Pahlav, one of the seven great houses of Iran claiming Arsacid origin." -- Toumanoff, C. (2010). "KAMSARAKAN". Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. XV, Fasc. 5. pp. 453–455.) So thats clearly not the same as the content you added, without edit summary.
Edit-warring on the Macedonian dynasty page, in order to add undue weight to the lede of a start/stub-class article (RV #1, RV#2, RV#3)
Adding "Armenian" to the Philippicus (general) page without edit summary/sources.[3]
Adding "Armenian" to the Islamic architecture page without edit summary/sources.[4]
Changing "Persian" to "Armenian", even though the Armenian in question served as a general in the Persian armies.[5]
Removing the Georgian transliteration on the Mushki page, using an edit summary "Nothing Georgian, they are connected much more with Armenians".[6]

I'm not saying that all of your edits are "incorrect", but you need to start using edit summaries on a structural basis, as well as paying more attention to Wikipedia's guidelines in general. Because this really is a pretty WP:TENDENTIOUS way of editing. Having said that, I did notice some of your good edits as welll, such as this one, and this one. Thanks in advance and all the best, - LouisAragon (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Leo Freeman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient Anatolians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Monument of the Battle of Musa Dagh (Musaler)

Hello, Leo Freeman. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Monument of the Battle of Musa Dagh (Musaler), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leo Freeman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Another alert since the last one expired. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topic banned

Hello. This message is to inform you that pursuant to this discussion, you have been banned from making any edit, or editing any page relating to the Balkans, the Middle East, and the Caucasus, broadly construed, for the duration of six months. Regards, Swarm {talk} 21:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3RR + editing while logged out

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Just wondering, why did you think initiating an edit war and making changes without being logged in[7] would work out for you, especially right after serving a six-month topic ban in 2018 within the same topic area?[8] - LouisAragon (talk) 03:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your interest in my modest person. Regarding the so-called "edit war," I view it as a necessary correction of information related to the Kingdom of Commagene. This topic holds particular significance for me due to its ties to Armenian civilization and heritage, elements that I believe were overlooked on the Wikipedia page. While I don't claim to be a professional Wikipedia editor, I strive to contribute and enhance information when I can find the time. Some years ago, I translated around 40 articles concerning Armenian topics from Russian and English into Armenian on the Armenian Wikipedia. However, I must clarify that I am no longer active on this platform.

As mentioned on the Commagene Wikipedia page, the Armenian heritage of the kingdom appears to be entirely neglected. Most notably, the ancestors of Antiochus I of Commagene were kings of Armenia, and their distinctive crown, the Armenian tiara, is well documented. Their policies, connections with Armenia, and claims to the hereditary title of the Kingdom of Armenia itself indicate the presence of an Armenian identity, not solely a "Greco-Iranian" one, as suggested by the article. Armenians are a blend of Hurro-Urartians and Indo-Europeans, representing the only surviving native population of the Armenian Highlands and Eastern Anatolia. Throughout many millennia, Armenians constituted a noteworthy presence in the historical region of Commagene. We continued to be a substantial segment of the local population, even more than 2000 years after the decline of the Commagene Kingdom, until the occurrence of the Armenian Genocide in the 20th century. Unfortunately, I consistently observe a pattern of overlooking Armenian heritage and identity in various Wikipedia topics that pertain to Armenian legacy.

The Eruanduni, also known as the Orontid dynasty, initially served as satraps and later became kings of Armenia, playing a crucial role in Armenian identity. The debate over their origins persists, and while an Iranian lineage is not confirmed, it was considered prestigious to emphasize a connection to the Achaemenids. Numerous scholarly articles explore theories suggesting a native Armenian or Armeno-Iranic origin for the dynasty.

Moreover, Armenian emperors and entire Armenian dynasties existed within the Byzantine Empire, and their presence did not diminish their strong affiliation with Byzantium. Similarly, the presence of Turkic dynasties in Iran does not undermine their Persian identity. Consider the House of Windsor; is its origin purely British? Strangely, there is no debate about erasing the British name when discussing this dynasty. In the case of Russian dynasties, their names and Russian identity are not questioned, even if they have German or other origins. This inconsistency raises questions about the policies applied to the Orontids and Armenia, or the Kingdom of Commagene. Despite attempts to edit, encountering resistance and a refusal to acknowledge proposed links, I chose not to further engage in argument. It appears that certain individuals control the related article, staunchly preventing any connection between Commagene and Armenia or Armenians. Leo Freeman (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert

You have recently made edits related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. This is a standard message to inform you that Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. - LouisAragon (talk) 03:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]