Jump to content

User talk:Leightonview

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Leightonview! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

I am concerned by your commentary on Bobby Neate's book. Her claim is not backed up by any evidence at all, and the whole book is rubbish. One reason for "complete documented proof" of an event not being available can be that the event didn't happen. That is the case here. The book is unindexed and no reputable historian would dream of ever using it as a source. Her absurd view of Asquith as "another Jimmy savile (sic)" (see her blog) demonstrates her, very, POV approach. I think we do a disservice to Wikipedia readers by suggesting that the book is anything like a reliable source, as it isn't. I've amended the text but wanted to give you an opportunity to respond. KJP1 (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norman Chappell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dead of Winter, The Gilded Cage and Dance with Death. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lisa Gastoni, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 03:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ewan Roberts. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 04:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Sally Bazely. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mr.weedle (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hugh Moxey. Mr.weedle (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hadal (talk) 05:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]