Jump to content

User talk:Legalnew

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Domains spammed:

Related domains:

Accounts:

Registered to an Owings Mills ISP
  • Employed by site-owner[1]

Articles:

Reference:

Public registration data:

Irwin Kramer
500 Redland Court
Owings Mills, MD 21117

--A. B. (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:LTVN.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LTVN.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Notice

The article The Legal Television Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this deleted?

[edit]

Full disclosure: I founded LTVN | Legal Television in order to make the law more understandable for laypersons. I never made any money on the project and spent a small fortune to produce extremely high quality content. You can view it for yourselves at www.clientelevision.com. We got some favorable press on it, but I must admit that I'm better at creating content than I am at navigating the internet world and getting better distribution. So the content hasn't taken off the way I had hoped it would, even though the feedback has been great. I would have thought that a site like Wikipedia, which I have supported for many years (probably among the few who donate each year), would be a "kindred spirit" in helping to make this content more accessible. I hate to put it like this, but I feel like you allow some organizations to publish information, while denigrating others, typically the smaller guys, for "promotion." I wish you would reconsider the deletion of this site. I am not a spammer, anything but. Perhaps, in your zeal to "protect" Wikipedia readers you might check out the content and see that the best way to protect them would be to give them a means of accessing it. Kramerslaw (talk) 02:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irwin, I have replied to your question above on your user page at
--A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 03:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legalnew&oldid=1189645392"