User talk:Leformefoldef

March 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hubble have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hubble was changed by Leformefoldef (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950929 on 2022-03-22T23:44:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble

Please don't make test edits. They just fill up the wp:page history without adding any value. You can use wp:Show preview to see what your edit will look like. You can (with Windows) right click on a link and open it in a new page to check its functionality. If everything works correctly, click "Publish page" to save your changes. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't test edits; I'm trying to draw attention to that page. Leformefoldef (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? That sort of thing might be construed as wp:vandalism in its own. Adakiko (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where should it redirect to? Leformefoldef (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care. Either is fine. HST is probably more commonly searched for. Check the page views on both articles (The redirects to Erwin will affect the totals) Adakiko (talk) 00:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please leave an wp:Edit summary describing what your change and maybe why you made the change. This shows up on the wp:page history and is helpful for finding edits. Adakiko (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hubble. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop it. Adakiko (talk) 00:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How are my edits disruptive? I just want to see what other people think that page should redirect to. Leformefoldef (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As stated above, you are filling up the page history. People get wp:blocked for repeated "self-reverted test edits". Adakiko (talk) 00:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. So edits to get attention are considered test edits? Leformefoldef (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hubble. Adakiko (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll stop. Leformefoldef (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change it to what you think it should be - did you see my reply at the Teahouse? If someone reverts it, start a discussion. wp:BRD. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did see your comments, and I think Edwin Hubble would be a better target because it's a person's name (and the person after whom HST is named), so is it okay to make one more change there and leave it at Edwin Hubble? Leformefoldef (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

comment Leformefoldef (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, please do not continue editing that redirect. ––FormalDude talk 00:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble redirect take two

Page views for Hubble Space Telescope Daily average views: 1,798
Page view for Edwin Hubble Daily average views: 537

Policy: wp:redirect - "Redirects are used to help people arrive more quickly at the page they want to read;' That sort of implies the most read article. Again, many of the HST views might be through the redirect.
@FormalDude: appears to disagree to you making more edits to Hubble redirect. If you do make the change and it gets reverted, wp:BRD Adakiko (talk) 00:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Leformefoldef! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Hubble, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~TNT (talk • she/her) 00:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]