User talk:Leefort

December 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to Mohy al-Din appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 10:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello. Your recent edit to Sayyid (name) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 07:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Leefort/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leefort! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Seghatoleslam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Seghatoleslam. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robert McClenon,

Thank you for your feedback on my Draft:Seghatoleslam Wikipedia article. I appreciate your suggestion to check the relationship between the redirect page "Seghatoleslam" and my draft.

To clarify, the redirect page "Seghatoleslam" is a separate Wikipedia article and is not directly related to my draft. However, I have reviewed the "Seghatoleslam" article and can confirm that it accurately reflects the content of my draft. I believe that readers who are interested in the topic of "Seghatoleslam" may find my draft informative and relevant, even though the two topics are distinct.

To clarify, the "Mirza Ali-Aqa Tabrizi" page is not directly related to the "Draft:Seghatoleslam" page and is referenced in my draft for informational purposes only (reference 24). I apologize for any confusion that this may have caused.

Thank you again for your feedback and please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.

Best regards,

Leefort Leefort (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Robert McClenon,

Thank you for your feedback on my Draft:Seghatoleslam Wikipedia article. I appreciate your suggestion to check the relationship between the redirect page "Seghatoleslam" and my draft.

To clarify, the redirect link on the page "Seghatoleslam" refers to a separate Wikipedia article and is not directly related to my draft. However, I have reviewed the "Seghatoleslam" page and can confirm that it accurately reflects the content of my draft. I believe that readers who are interested in the topic of "Seghatoleslam" may find my draft informative and relevant.

To clarify, the "Mirza Ali-Aqa Tabrizi" page is not directly related to the "Draft:Seghatoleslam" page and is referenced in my draft for informational purposes only (reference 24). I apologise for any confusion that this may have caused.

Thank you again for your feedback, and please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.

Best regards,

Leefort

Leefort (talk) 16:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. @Robert McClenon,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to kindly request your assistance in moving my draft page titled "Draft:Seghatoleslam" to the official Wikipedia page called "Seghatoleslam".

After careful consideration and improvements made to the draft, I believe that it is ready for publication as an official Wikipedia page. The content has been thoroughly researched and provides valuable information on the topic.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could review the draft and facilitate its transition to the "Seghatoleslam" page within the Wikipedia article namespace. By doing so, the information will be accessible to a wider audience, contributing to the dissemination of knowledge on this subject.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I look forward to your guidance and support in this matter. Please let me know if there are any additional steps or requirements that I need to fulfill.

Best regards,

Lee Fortune Leefort (talk) 17:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Seghatoleslam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Seghatoleslam. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 16:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hi Leefort! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Seghatoleslam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Seghatoleslam. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Robert McClenon,

Thank you so much for your help and your your guidance. I appreciate that.

Leefort (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seghatoleslam (title) has been accepted

Seghatoleslam (title), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ortizesp (talk) 05:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ortizesp,

Thank you for the wonderful news! I'm delighted to hear that Seghatoleslam (title) has been created on Wikipedia. It's been a pleasure contributing to the platform and expanding its knowledge base.

I appreciate the support and guidance provided by the Wikipedia community throughout this process. Rest assured, I'll continue to make quality contributions and strive to enhance the content on Wikipedia.

If I have any questions or require assistance in the future, I won't hesitate to reach out to the help desk.

I'd be happy to provide feedback to help improve the process further. Wikipedia has been an invaluable resource, and I'm keen to contribute to its ongoing development.

Once again, thank you for the message and the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia.

Best regards,

Leefort (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)leefort[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Style (form of address), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honorific title. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]