User talk:Leafy46

This user is in school.

This user is taking an academic wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
However, Leafy46 will sometimes get the chance to edit, so they would respond quicker and edit more than those who were on a regular wikibreak.
They will be back on Wikipedia full-time when school is over.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Leafy46, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Celestial seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinkshift has been accepted

Pinkshift, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thatguy1987 (talk) 20:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Amy (Green Day song) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amy (Green Day song). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy (Green Day song) has been accepted

Amy (Green Day song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amy (Green Day song)

On 2 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amy (Green Day song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Green Day wrote a tribute song for singer Amy Winehouse following her death, despite never having met her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amy (Green Day song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Amy (Green Day song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 15 Step has been accepted

15 Step, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soundbytes

I understand the thought that it doesn't sound very good by comparison, but in order for them to qualify for fair use, we cannot include music clips in that high of fidelity. I appreciate the thought, but it's best to leave the former one there. dannymusiceditor ^oops 22:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could always reduce the sound quality on the former one, or would it be better to migrate the older one to the newer file? It goes against Wikipedia:SAMPLE in any case to have multiple versions of the same sample per one song recording, so a transition should be made regardless of which direction. Leafy46 (talk) 03:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyMusicEditor: Forgot to ping, apologies. Leafy46 (talk) 03:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I presumed the earlier, original bit uploaded about a year ago would be retained, and we could just pretend the other one was never here. dannymusiceditor ^oops 05:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyMusicEditor: I've addressed your concerns about quality and have made the switch. I understand that standards must be kept a bit higher on a featured article like Bleed American, so thanks for bringing the fact to my attention! Leafy46 (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was at first confused that you reverted my edits, but in truth, I actually had no idea that this clip had existed since 2009. Had I been aware of that, I would have just gotten the older one reduced and used this in the first place rather than upload the other. Oops™! dannymusiceditor ^oops 21:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Still Breathing (Green Day song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Still Breathing (Green Day song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Still Breathing (Green Day song)

The article Still Breathing (Green Day song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Still Breathing (Green Day song) and Talk:Still Breathing (Green Day song)/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 20:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Still Breathing (Green Day song)

The article Still Breathing (Green Day song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Still Breathing (Green Day song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Still Breathing (Green Day song)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 17:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mama (My Chemical Romance song)

On 29 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mama (My Chemical Romance song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that mamas sang on "Mama"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mama (My Chemical Romance song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mama (My Chemical Romance song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mama (My Chemical Romance song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mama (My Chemical Romance song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mama (My Chemical Romance song)

The article Mama (My Chemical Romance song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mama (My Chemical Romance song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Mama (My Chemical Romance song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heat 2 - long plot

Hi,

I saw you added the long plot tag to the Heat 2 plot summary.

I'lll work on streamlining the plot to be more straight forward and manageable.

Once I do that, do I remove the tag myself? Iheartmylibrary22 (talk) 18:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iheartmylibrary22: Hi! That is indeed how it works -- have you already taken a look through WP:NOVELPLOT? Leafy46 (talk) 18:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks. Will take a closer look and proceed from there. Iheartmylibrary22 (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

song knloange

Hey I saw your subtitles for toxic and thought you probably know about music, does this song have call and response because I was gonna add the sample and say that it dose but I wasn't sure. also you don't need to write the subtitles for that sample I will. I have before see. you can leave a link like that on your page it might be faster then editing it all the time. also do you type the subtitles by hand or with an editor of sorts because I just look at Audacity to get the timing Anthony2106 (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this link is better Anthony2106 (talk) 11:51, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony2106: Thank you for your work with subtitles! I would say yes to the sample you linked: I'd probably write that first line as "You stand there lookin' at me (at me)", for instance. Also, yes, I do write all the subtitles by hand.

On a related note, when you do write subtitles, do double-check them before leaving them, especially since they get a lot less attention than a "normal" article would. I see, for instance, that there are various mistakes between "You're" and "Your" in the subtitles you've written for "Love on Top", and occasionally there are lines improperly capitalized like in "Hot to Go!". In any case, thank you again for your work in this underappreciated field! Leafy46 (talk) 15:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One more quick thing: If you could put Template:Subtitles at the top of the file page after you create subtitles, that would be much appreciated (For example: this revision). Thanks! Leafy46 (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks ill change the page to make it say it uses call and response.

"I see, for instance, that there are various mistakes between "You're" and "Your"" - yes I'm really bad at spelling, I'll try to remember.

About the uncatilized lines, you know how in the past people would write the subtitles in all caps. well I think its because we don't know what is the end or start of a sentence in a movie or show. Anyway in Modern Family on Disney+ they seem to have them uppercase when starting a sentence and lowercase when not starting a sentence, so seems like when starting a sentence they are meant to be uppercase - not when starting a line. But when does a "sentence" happen in a song?, so instead of doing all caps I did all lowercase, but lately I've been doing it the more common way - just making the first letter uppercase.

I'll try to remember to put {{subtitles}}.

Ive been using mpv to play music videos and downloading subtitles online, adding "sub-auto=fuzzy" to the config file makes it autoload subtitles with a similar name. so I just realized earlier today I can use this to preview the subtitles before uploading them, this way I don't spam my edit history. Anthony2106 (talk) 04:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]