User talk:LePopEncyclopedik

License tagging for File:Marianne Dissard live with band.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marianne Dissard live with band.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marianne Dissard live with band.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marianne Dissard live with band.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amor Belhom Duo

The article Amor Belhom Duo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable band, no independent, reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 13:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raphael Mann

The article Raphael Mann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Working musician, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass GNG or NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

Much of your text is unsourced inappropriately. Her Facebook page, for example, is not an independent third party source. Some of your references are clearly inadequate too. Dissard has collaborated with Tucson band Calexico's Joey Burns, who composed her first two albums: lo-fi demo debut 'Dedicated To Your Walls' (2006) and 'L'Entredeux' (2008), which he also produced. An album of bitter love songs, L'Entredeux won a Coup de Coeur prize from France's Académie Charles Cros in 2009 and was released in Europe by labels Le Pop Musik and Vacilando'68 is sourced to a pge that doesn't mention her, let alone confirm what you have said.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

For example , your summary lead section doesn't tell us how she meets the notability criteria linked above, but instead praises her music, A central figure in Tucson's desert music community"[1] with her unique hybrid of French Chanson and Americana, she is noted as a "charismatic performer"[2] and for the quality of her lyrics refrenced to an interview with her. Whether people like her music is not a criterion for notability, and she isn't an independent third-party source.

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

But that doesn't mean you can stuff external links with a random assortment of stuff

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused by this edit on my talk page this morning. I thought I'd replied above, have I missed something else? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LePopEncyclopedik: please reply Jimfbleak's above inquiry about a conflict of interest before making any further edits to Wikipedia. In particular, what is your relationship to Marianne Dissard, if any? Also please note that it is mandatory to disclose if you have been paid in association with your edits. Thanks. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 21:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]