User talk:Ldecalmer

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

9002 (number)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 9002 (number), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.exampleproblems.com/wiki/index.php/9000_number.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 9002 (number)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 9002 (number). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 9000 (number). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 9000 (number) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Hello Ldecalmer. There really is no point to copy and pasting the contents of the article 800 into every single number between 800 and 900. A redirect already suffices and saves space, so please stop. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 05:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to ask you again to stop. First off, Wikipedia does not want an article on every single number. Not all numbers are notable, hence why all the numbers between 800 and 899 redirect to 800 (number) instead of having their own page. Second, you should not be copying and pasting text from one article to the other without proper attribution, that is against our licensing requirements. If you are interested in numbers, please feel free to improve our existing articles on numbers by adding new content, but not by copying existing content to a new page. I'll be glad to help you if you have any questions, but your behavior right now is disruptive and should stop. Altamel (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop. Why are you listing all the facts about numbers 800-900 on the page 728 (number)? It makes no sense, and, as mentioned above, we don't need an article for every number. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 723 (number). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Once again, every number doesn't need its own Wiki page, especially when you're adding a page about number 800-900, which doesn't even mention 723. If you continue this editing, you will be blocked. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 718 (number). For the last time, we do not need a copy and pasted list of facts for every number. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not finished yet, so please, stop bugging me. Everything will be okay, calm down.

I am just fixing it, I will make you perfectly happy, in a weeks time

As explained previously, we do not need an article for every number. The article 800 (number) already deals adequately with all the numbers 800-899, and the 700 (number) article already deals with all number 700-799. There is no need to create articles for every number, as they would all be very short, unnoticeable articles, and doing so when nobody else wants you to is unhelpful. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]