User talk:Laxmi2019

This is Laxmi2019's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Laxmi2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
Simplified Manual of Style
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard is warmly recommended)
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Ask questions at Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
And feel free to make test edits in your own sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing! Sam Sailor 10:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ready for editing?

The

Adventure

Hi Laxmi2019!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by Sam Sailor 10:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PrussianOwl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Laxmi2019/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Laxmi2019/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PrussianOwl (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Laxmi2019! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PrussianOwl (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Laxmi Neupane, from its old location at User:Laxmi2019/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 10:39, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laxmi Neupane (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blogs and YouTube are not suitable sources for establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laxmi Neupane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laxmi Neupane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Followup - I saw that you were requesting help on the IRC channel, I'm presuming you wanted more explanation of why your draft was declined.

There are a number of things that keep this from being an acceptable article. The number one problem is establishing notability, presumably according to the criteria that apply to musicians (see NMUSIC). Notability is a harder bar to pass than simply proving that someone exists, has performed, has recordings etc. You need independent evidence that at least one of the criteria has been met.

Aside from that, as the biography of a living person, we require in-line citations for every statement of fact that you make about the person. You can learn more about how to create these citations by reading Referencing for beginners.

Other problems with draft will also prevent its being accepted: it is written in a tone that we would consider promotional. You may not have external links in the body of the article. Some of those may be turned into citations, others are perhaps better omitted.

A few other things that could be fixed by other editors, but which you should do. Wikipedia does not use strings of text in all-caps style unless it really is an initialism. An exhaustive list of awards, especially without verifiable references, will likely be edited down to just the most important or perhaps eliminated entirely. Excessive external links to performance videos will not be kept. Interviews may sometimes be used for specific non-controversial information, but they are considered primary sources and do not contribute to notability and should not be given as general references.

Finally, the overlap in your subject's name and your username raises the question of whether you have a connection with the subject. If so, you need to follow our conflict of interest policy and perhaps read through the advice about autobiographies. Although an editor with a conflict-of-interest is allowed to create a draft, the COI should be dislosed.

So, your next steps should be:

disclose or deny your COI on your user page.
read NMUSIC and identify independent references that establish that one or more of the criteria are met

I hope this advice is not too discouraging. There are many editors available who will be happy to answer your questions and help you towards being a successful Wikipedia contributor. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Laxmi2019! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:19, Monday, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your draft article, Draft:Laxmi Neupane

Hello, Laxmi2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laxmi Neupane".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]