User talk:Lavendar Vallery
My talk page
[edit]Feel free to talk about me I guess. You can also publicly criticize my editing here if you wish, I think freedom of speech and accountability are important so I won't remove anything unless it is slander, vandalism, or irrelevant (might keep it if it's funny though). Also, feel free to contact me regarding any topics, if you want any help editing anything, advice, anything really. Please edit below this segment if you wish to write anything.
Lavendar Vallery (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
For transparency, I have included a copy of the e-mail I sent to Onel5969
Hi Onel5969,
I noticed you reverted the entire article I wrote about Elton: Jewel Box back to a redirect. I read the guidelines surrounding wp:nalbum, which you cited as the reason for reverting the article. I appreciate your initiative in adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, but I still think the compilation deserves its own page, although I might have gone about writing the page the wrong way. I also want to make it clear that although I spent a considerable amount of time writing and formatting the article, that I don't take this personally.
I admit that citing Elton John's official website as my main source was a mistake but it's something that can be fixed. Are there any other reasons you think that this compilation does not need to have its own page? I think that the collection is notable enough to warrant its own page, it has been covered by Rolling Stones and Billboard and also appeared on national charts. I understand that just because the collection is by Elton John, that doesn't necessarily make it noteworthy. I hope you understand that this was a good-faith edit.
Talk Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Elton_John_albums_discography#Elton%3A_Jewel_Box
Basically, my main question is, what are the issues that need to be addressed before Elton: Jewel Box can have its own page? Also, was it really necessary to essentially delete the article rather than add a box summarizing the issues with the article? Thanks for your time. I look forward to your response.
Sincerely, Lavendar Vallery
Hi. Thanks for the email, but sorry, I don't respond via email to editors I don't know. I'm glad you're not taking my redirect personally, for there was nothing personal about it. And I didn't delete the article, simply restored the redirect. All your work is still there in the history. If there hadn't been an original redirect, I would have draftified it. You are correct, simply because it is an album by a famous artist does not mean that it meets notability criteria. When I restored the redirect, I cited WP:NALBUM, and in your email you mentioned several items which would definitely qualify (the coverage in RS and Billboard, charting on national charts). But none of that was mentioned or cited in the article. Even without that, the current citing gives no indication of notability, since it is all either primary (from Elton's site), or from a non-RS source (YouTube). If you put the Billboard/Rolling Stones stuff into the article, with citations, and the charting info (again, with citations), it would appear to pass notability. I hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 15:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. I sent you an e-mail because I didn't want to point fingers and publicly "call you out" for "deleting" my article. Obviously I didn't want to start an editing war either. I would be more than willing to cite other sources and then maybe we can perhaps restore the article with proper citations? As you might be able to see I am fairly new as a Wikipedia editor but I am by no means unexperienced when it comes to editing.
What kind of sources would be appropriate for citing quotes and opinions by Elton John? I agree that generally speaking YouTube is not a good source for reliable information, however I thought that in this case it was reliable since it unmistakably features Elton John expressing his personal opinions, which I was citing. Anyway, I'll rework the article, add proper citations and remove any claims I can't verify. Should the sources to Elton John's official website be completely removed or should I supplement the claims with more sources?
Lavendar Vallery (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Elton-jewel-box-album-cover-2020.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Elton-jewel-box-album-cover-2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Elton: Jewel Box
[edit]
Hello, Lavendar Vallery. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elton: Jewel Box, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 7 August 2021 (UTC)