User talk:Laurent Demailly

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warp speed Data Transfer (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Laurent Demailly, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laurent Demailly, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Laurent Demailly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. An additional unreliable reference doesn't help. If you want advice about reliable sources, either ask at the Teahouse, or ask me, at my talk page, to ask at the Teahouse. Also, Twitter is not a reliable source. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer

Hello, Laurent Demailly. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Warp speed Data Transfer".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warp speed Data Transfer (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WSDT may be notable, but we require multiple, reliable, arm's length sources, each of which provides signficant coverage, to provide evidence of it as described above. The article does not provide that level of sourcing.

Now, I've just thrown a lot of words at you that have common English meanings, but which our policies and history give more specific meanings. Bureaucratic "terms of art", if you will. It's normal to be a bit confused about what we're looking for here.

You may also take a look at User:Joe Decker/IsThisNotable. I'm still working on refining it, but my hope is to provide a more step-by-step (if still not simple) approach to explaining what we need in terms of demonstrating notability. I hope that it will be helpful.

If you have further questions you may also want to enquire at the WP:Teahouse, which is a great resource for newer editors looking to make sense of our requirements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 05:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer

Hello, Laurent Demailly. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Warp speed Data Transfer".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 14:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]