User talk:Laura Seltzer-Duny

This is Laura Seltzer-Duny's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen J. Morewitz (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to be a resume and not an encyclopedia article. Please re-write this to incorporate reliable, independent sources that discuss Morewitz' work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 21:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Laura Seltzer-Duny! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 21:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. please do not remove this information until the content issues have been addressed. They have not, and do not remove prior AfC templates Star Mississippi 15:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Laura Seltzer-Duny. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Laura Seltzer-Duny. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Laura Seltzer-Duny|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen J. Morewitz (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list. Much of the content and sources are not about Morewitz (what his family did, members of associations, who he worked with, etc. are not about him) and needs to be severely trimmed, meaning at least half of the content needs to be removed and likely much more. Stick only to the most notable items (not all of his publications, cases where served as expert witness, the awards, etc. are notable) and only one source is needed to support a single fact unless it is controversial which none of this appears to be.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz

Hello, Laura Seltzer-Duny. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stephen J. Morewitz

Hello, Laura Seltzer-Duny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stephen J. Morewitz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]