User talk:LaukkuTheGreit

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive subject or headline for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

Welcome!

Hello, LaukkuTheGreit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 20:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will look at some of those pages. :) LaukkuTheGreit (talk) 08:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disney film plot summeries

Thank you for working on the plot summeries. I am going to look through the history of Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas and will try to find a shorter version of the plot (and one without the uncited stuff in it too). Feel free to cheak out my contribs to other Disney pages and edit them to! Also, the tone in Barney's Great Adventure may be off, so feel free to fix the tone. Thanks! Lighteningluster (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you! :) What I mostly did was just tagging overlong summaries, although I actually edited a few as well.LaukkuTheGreit (talk) 15:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you edit ones such as Oliver & Company and Home on the Range (film)? OK, I don't really like Home on the Range, but I had saw it and I couldn't agree with you more when you said it was ridiculous how long it was, seeing as it's so simple (the plot). Also, the ending isn't finnished and I think it has plenty of typos.

Oliver however is awesome, and the lede sentence "and again on March 7, 2009" is incorrect, as it was listing the re-releases in theatres and not on home video, plus the release was Febuary 7. Also, I don't think that saying Oliver is cute is NPOV. In fact, I'd recommend just removing the character section altogether.

Lighteningluster (talk) 17:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think I will spend much time rewriting dozens of plot summaries, although I may look at those you mentioned. The reason why the Home on the Range synopsis was so ridiculous was that there was a tag asking to EXPAND it.LaukkuTheGreit (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw that, however, the reason the expand tag was added was because back in March, the part about the plot in the lede was actually originally the entire plot section of the article until someone added that to the lede and asked for the section to be expanded. Then the section was written as it is now in June, with the user acidently messing up the image. So the image was fixed but not the plot tag. Also I think they might have asked to expand it because it doesn't have the full ending. I'd like though to have the Cinderella III plot I posted here done to Cinderella III: A Twist in Time, as I still can't edit a semi-protected page. Otherwise, I'd just fix all of these plots. Lighteningluster (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so you're not an autoconfirmed user? Your request makes much more sense now. LaukkuTheGreit (talk) 19:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I tried contacting Killiondude to unprotect some of the pages but he must be offline. So I must wait. I will be autocomfirmed though, on Monday (September 7). Lighteningluster (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so glad you did Oliver & Company because that one is one of my favorites. Now, I found this at [1] for Robin Hood (1973 film):

The story begins as Robin Hood and Little John run from the Sheriff of Nottingham, who has ambushed them with a team of archers. After narrowly escaping, Robin Hood and Little John happen upon the royal entourage which is taking Prince John and his counselor, Sir Hiss, to Nottingham in order to tax the people there. Disguised as female fortune-tellers, Robin and Little John effectively steal all the gold they can carry and run off into the forest, leaving Prince John sucking his thumb in humiliation. In Nottingham, Robin uses Friar Tuck to smuggle the stolen gold back to the peasants. Later Robin sees Maid Marian, she and Robin had once been sweethearts as children, but were forced to part ways when she moved to London. But she is mistaken: Robin can't stop thinking about her. But since Robin is an outlaw he and Marian wait for marriage. Seething with rage, that Robin is winning, John triples the taxes, making the bleak situation in Nottingham even worse. One night, Robin Hood, disguised again as the beggar, learns that Friar Tuck is in jail and will rescue him, save Nottingham once and for all and give Prince John the justice that has been coming to him for a long time.

I'm sure it needs some expanding, but I'm sure it's a shortened version of Wikipedia's own summery (which is probably just the first half so that they won't spoil it for others). I like Robin Hood, Beauty and the Beast, and Pinocchio too just like Oliver & Company. Lighteningluster (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Signature!

Testing :-) LaukkuTheGreit 14:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, almost forgot User:talk link. Fixed. Also added link to contributions. :)

If you see any imperfections in my signature, please notify me here. LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 15:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citizen Kane

No, the "no tresspassing" sign is not necessary to understand the plot - but that was conceived as the true end of the film. Rosebud was an afterthought. -- kosboot (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All right, then. At least it's not making the synopsis worse.--LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 16:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your tireless work improving The Thief and the Cobbler and repairing persistent vandalism. Asteuartw (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thief and the Cobbler

I reverted your revert. I'm not trying to hurt the film. I understand that opinions about the animation vary with source. I personally have nothing against the film and ultimately feel for the creator whose work was ultimately destroyed. The article is going to receive increased traffic soon do to a review that will be out this week. I wanted to make sure that it is up to wiki specs beforehand - particularly wp:NPOV. Otherwise, it will be defaced something awful! Anyway, have a great day. -DevinCook (talk) 03:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand completely. :-)I used a new wording that I think is both correct and NPOV.--LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 07:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One-Eye was a Throne

In the original film, the slave women threw One-Eye off a cliff, whilst in the Recobbled Cut, the storyboard of which hadn't made it to the final cut, shows One-eye being sat on by the slave woman, hencing the words the slave woman were saying is actually 'Throne' not 'Throw', like in the original.--Talk 20:33 1 February 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.138.122 (talk)

File:MiramaxPoster.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MiramaxPoster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LaukkuTheGreit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LaukkuTheGreit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hiroyuki Kanno (game designer)

Hello LaukkuTheGreit,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hiroyuki Kanno (game designer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

simulator of vitality

Hi, I give you some suggestions related with bot which could potentially search topics with: "estimated vitality". Generally it seems to me that your idea with bot of "estimated vitality" is interesing and maybe could evoluate in future if we test it in various ways.

When we make metric based on number of Interwiki.... Better option will be search number of language versions which has more than five pageviews per day than excatly Interwiki number. For example Polandball has 104 language versions but normally ([2]) has fewer versions than Hetalia:Alexis Powers ( [3]). Only ~~10 language versions with +5 pageviews per day. There are quite a lot of cross-wiki spams on Wikipdia such like Corbin Bleu etc.

When we make "age weight" for hitorical topics we also could make metric "how long the article exist". For example Kylie Jenner (1997) can has better weight due to article exist since 2009 while Marcus Rashford (1997) exist since 2015 (in English Wikipedia and other language versions). Justin Bieber is younger than Mohammed Salah and Elizabeth Holmes but he has article since 2008, while Salah since 2012 and Holmes since 2014.

Very a lot of articles has many "what links here" due to templates. But it would be interesing comparing links which are not due to templates. Dawid2009 (talk) 20:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We also need to remember that some articles(for example Last Christmas, Lawn game or El clasico) are popular sesonally Dawid2009 (talk) 22:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LaukkuTheGreit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WilliamsAndBabbitt.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WilliamsAndBabbitt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doukyuusei

Hi, thank you for your contribution to this article, could we work together on Elf games ?
I am from the French Wikipedia, where the French visual novel project is hosted.
--31NOVA (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@31NOVA:: Hmm, I haven't taken much interest in them beyond YU-NO and doing simple updates on Doukyuusei (since no one else bothered to). But once the latter's remake releases in English, I expect some English (or maybe even Swedish & Finnish which I also understand) reliable sources about it to pop up and in such a case will probably do some work on it.--LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 21:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LaukkuTheGreit:: Okay, no problem. --31NOVA (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on "List of graphic adventure games"

Greetings, LaukkuTheGreit.

I apologize for all the destructive changes caused to the page, as I am a new user with no experience in Wikipedia, nor did I have clear criteria on what titles should or should not be on the list, popular or unpopular, of mild or mature content, English-spoken or non-English... I didn't intend to make changes to the page that reflected my personal view, a disruptive action or one that could be considered unpopular, thus my purpose is to enhance the list (as you can see in the View History I added some valid titles too and some minor changes before my other mistakes).I will ensure subsequent edits are focused in adding relevant information and not changes that may conflict with both other users contributions and popular consensus. Last changes I wrongfully deleted from the list have been undid by Grueslayer, so I hope I can contribute as much as I can to this Wikipedia page without deleting any valuable content unnecessarily.

I received a notification from you, with me being unaware if it is an automatic message or it was personally redacted, so decided to answer it from your talk section. Sapientia Obscura (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sapientia Obscura: No permanent harm done. Additionally, I realise I perhaps should've assumed, per WP:FAITH, that your interpretation of the actions of the previous editor weren't malicious and you were simply naïve. :) BTW you can use this template (like I just did) to ensure your reply is noticed by the relevant user. --LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 17:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vitals Video Games Target Counts

Hello, thanks so much for your edit in the Vitals-5 Sports, games, and recreation's video games section! I just wanted to let you know, I changed the target count of video games back to 100, which I had decided I was going to do anyway because I came up with some card games and felt if we have 5 Legend of Zelda articles we are okay even though I love The Legend of Zelda. So I thought it was cool when I saw you'd made it 100 anyway haha. I also love Civilization and decided your bold edit of taking Civ1 out is fine as well since we have the series so I'll assume your edits for the other video games are sensible as well even though I haven't played them. Thanks again, LightProof1995 (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your sentiment. These can always be debated however. I'd myself prefer breadth over depth in this case, and perhaps the only video game sub-entries I'd retain would be Final Fantasy VII, GTA III, the currently listed Mario games and a single article for Pokémon games (and I'm saying this as a Monkey Island fan). The space hogged by subentries could be reallocated to other games I'm thinking may deserve inclusion, such as Fate/Stay Night (there are no individual visual novels represented as of now), Ace Attorney, Adventure (1980 video game), Prince of Persia, Lemmings...--LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 21:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

about me

my future 2601:881:8100:C120:F199:4479:D8FA:358A (talk) 20:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? What about you? You have no other edit history and your post has little substance.--LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 20:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on List of Graphic Adventures

Thank you for your last edit in the article, and above all for all your contributions in the last year! I may have some mistakes here and there yet I only wish to better the page as much as I can given that there is so much work to do with the large amount of titles / info absent from its lists. I hope we can continue to keep on expanding it as only a few users tend to give it proper attention.

Best regards Sapientia Obscura (talk) 12:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, everybody makes mistakes sometimes and they are to be learned from.--LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 10:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bottom 10% VA5/Society and social sciences articles by pageviews

Hi! Are you starting a discussion on "Society and social sciences bottom 10% articles by pageviews", like you did with Technology and Arts? I'm interested working on quota enforcement on the Language section especially. It currently has a lot of articles with low pageviews, that I mass-added there years ago. Thought I'd like to clean after myself, and I'm asking to see what your plans are so we won't be doing overlapping work. --Makkool (talk) 16:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Makkool: Currently, I have no real plans to make more bottom lists. I can however document my personal steps to get a clean list from CSV files downloadable from the Massviews tool. This may lack some details, but more or less, from memory what I did was:

I put a VA5 page URL into the Massviews tool (with the Wikilinks option and a decently large timeframe selected)
After the processing was finished, I downloaded and opened the CSV file in Notepad++ where I auto-replaced (Ctrl+H) double quotes with commas (after having first replaced pre-existing double quotes in article names and commas into something unused, checked by Ctrl+F:ing through the VA5 page) in preparation for next steps
I used [4] to remove everything after the second comma (the CSV includes a lot of numeric data unnecessary for a simple list)
I used Notepad++ to remove remaining commas and return commas and double quotes in article names from the temp characters
I used [5] to remove everything in non-mainspace (if none of the articles have ":" in them, just remove everything with ":")
I used [6] to reverse the lines, so that the least-viewed item is at the top
I selected and removed all lines after the first 10% (Notepad++ handily shows line numbers)
And I used [7] to add "|" at the beginning of each line for the unbulleted list template in the final post.--LaukkuTheGreit (Talk•Contribs) 20:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this! I'm not that much of a coder, so these are helpful instructions. --Makkool (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]