User talk:Lapablo/Archive 1

Environmental Defense Fund Europe

Hi there, many thanks for reviewing Environmental Defense Fund Europe, much appreciated. You said there weren't enough references present, can you let me know how many more should be added, and perhaps give an example where one is needed? Many thanks again. Robccfc (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC) robccfc[reply]

Robccfc The amount of references doesn't really matter but its all about the quality of the source. Every content added to a page needs to be referenced if not it will be removed. Read more at WP:IC. Lapablo (talk) 21:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

about an article you accepted:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anya Benton DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Wax Digital

Hello, thanks for reviewing this post. I spoke to someone on the live chat and removed some sections, I just wanted to check to see if the way this page is now written is still seen to be like an advert?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Wax_Digital — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwhitey89 (talk • contribs) 14:10, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ITWorx

I was in the process of reviewing this draft when you declined it. Did you have a look at the sources I listed on the draft's talk page? It looked like significant coverage in reliable sources. ~Kvng (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kvng, I think the under review tag had been there for two days before being removed by I dream of horses. Unfortunately i never checked the talk page for the sources you added and i have just done that now, i'm not certain those sources are good enough, the third one however is from Businesswire hence a press release. Let me know what you think. Lapablo (talk) 14:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No foul removing the under-review tag. This is borderline and WP:NCORP is a high bar these days so we'll go with your judgement on it. ~Kvng (talk) 14:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your policy is destructive

Please do not destroy contributions of other people. Xx236 (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC) "This editor is a deletionist." And I am an anti-Vandal. Xx236 (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Valencia article

It looks like this is in mainspace now. It's still heavily biased towards promoting Valencia, but since you already pushed it back once to draft, we can't really do that again. Should it be up for AFD? There are a handful of news articles from the local Arizona papers that cover his involvement. In the meantime, I have tagged his article for autobio (obvious COI), notability and advertising until that can be cleaned up by a neutral editor. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF:, exactly my only problem with the article. Initially he created the article to promote creating a county that doesn't exist, the local sources are quite thin, the vogue article is a passing mention and nothing more really... I think AFD is right for this one. Lapablo (talk) 04:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lapablo, some of the local Arizona sources show significant coverage, like Arizona Daily Sun and White Mountain Independent where they dig into his background. Others, I agree are passing mentions like with his book reviews. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AngusWOOF So what do you advise? Lapablo (talk) 18:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lapablo, I would check if he even has a chance of meeting WP:BASIC. If he's borderline, then we can scrub out the article to keep it neutral, and there's no chance he is notable, then AFD would be appropriate. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For Reviewing My Article

I noticed you reviewed by article titled Kelvin Ikeduba I had become worried since my last 10+ articles had been unreviewed I even almost thought my account must have been faulty or something but pheewww what a relief it isn’t faulty after all. Thanks once more.Celestina007 (talk) 02:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007:, You're pretty much welcome. Nice job on creating the article, sometimes it actually takes time before your article can be seen or patrolled. There's just a bunch of articles laying around on NPR. keep it up. Lapablo (talk) 18:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Silly Me

It seems we both were reviewing the Jeremiah Red article coincidently at the same time whilst I opened an AFD, you requested a speedy delete now I honestly do not know if or not to remove the AFD notice or leave it there. I’m as confused as they come right now 🤦‍♀️Celestina007 (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007:, Hahaha it happens, you can withdraw nomination of article from AFD if you know the procedure for non-admin closure or you can also leave it for an admin to fix. Lapablo (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mail Notice

Hello, Lapablo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Celestina007 (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ehraz Ahmed

Thanks for reviewing the Draft. I have rewritten the entire article by following the neutral tone with some reliable sources. I think that the subject passes the notability criteria.

Can you review the draft for any other mistakes that I can fix? Tatupiplu (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Archive Lapablo (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Hugsyrup. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sapiens Foundation, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hug^syrup 13:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need Your Help in Improving the article and Support New Writers

To Improve a person try and try again, need your support and guidance to improve the article, Just a thought if every article is removed within few week other contributors will not be able to contribute to it. The whole idea of Wikipedia was to improve the article thru various edits from people from all walks of life. I think minimum 6 month for an article for it grow organically is important. You are experts if you keep deleting the new articles, we cannot grow nor the article. I request you to help me with this article.Miles249 (talk) 11:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Steve Pascolo

There's no requirement that authors respond to reviewer requests. It's also valid for reviewers to skip refbombed submissions. You declined this for not establishing notability. Did you actually review the 37 refs to make this determination? ~Kvng (talk) 14:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of the first two points, we are all learning here everyday. I had gone through most of the references and even searched GNEWS and GBOOKS the sources were scanty hence why i declined. Lapablo (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kontrast.at

Thx for reviewing. I added "reception" with two additional links. If you have further ideas how I can improve the article, please let me know.

All the best, ~Diwanbartwisch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diwanbartwisch (talk • contribs) 18:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion on the article

Hello Lapablo, I am a new Wikipedia user trying to create my first article. I had submitted Draft: Meghshala. It was 4 months ago reviewed by you and rejected, primarily because I had breadth in terms of citations but all of them had passing reference about Meghshala. However, recently an independent research work done by research team got accepted into ACM journal. The paper deals in entirety with Meghshala. I was wondering, if that article helps the draft to get published. I had spent significant time on this and I would hate to let it go wasted. I also understand, I might be in minor conflict as my research team did research around the impact of their intervention. However, I have mentioned that clearly on the talk page and I have tried to maintain a neutral point of view while writing about them. My main motivation of writing about Meghshala was that as we evaluated them, it would be an easy article to write about as a beginner. I would really appreaciate any help in this concern.

Adiosvr (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article in draft

Hello Lapablo, I appreciate your concern on my article " Draft:Baskut Tuncak". Of course regulations are important but I want to ask your help.That was the first article I created when I almost knew nothing about Wikipedia rules.So it had problems.I then worked on it more than five times, and put a lot of time on it, but it stayed in draft until I got frustrated and gave it up. Now may be you can tell me what to do with it. Thanks for your time. Alex-h (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alex-h I will request a refund on the article, subjects seems notable. Lapablo (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lapablo, did you request a "refund", as you said you would? As far as I can see after this post telling Lapablo you would, you just went on to nominate dozens of other pages for deletion, and I have not managed to find any record of your having posted anything anywhere relating to this draft.

Alex-h Luckily I happened to see your request, and I have restored the draft for you. JBW (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JBW Thanks for the refund, i had added this to my todo list over here but its been crowded and havent had time to do much apart from clearing Abandoned draft. Lapablo (talk) 21:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kendall Hunt Publishing Company

Hello Lapablo

You were exceptionally fast. Before I had finished writing my article and built in the sources, it was already gone. At least not deleted, but in the draft. It would be nice to move it back again, because I don't want to wait 4 months for a pitiful reviewer to look at it. In the last 15 years I have not only done 11000 edits but also written about 2800 new articles, 2700 of which met the Wikipeida criteria and therefore remained standing (Many of the deleted articles concerned French-speaking Switzerland and were deleted in the time by French wikipedians by applying relevance criteria from France to Switzerland). I mention this only to show that I know Wikipedia and know that the sources must be indicated. Eruedin (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eruedin, The subject seems notable that's why i decided to move to draft so it could give you time to add the necessary sources without article being deleted. I will go through the article later today. Lapablo (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Central Asian-American Enterprise Fund

Hi Lapablo, apparently you are mistaken that it has been over 6 months since I have edited the article, as I most recently made additions/changes to it in December, I believe. Actually, I have made several additions to expand and improve the article, since it was put into a draft holding place. How did you fail to see that? If you have deleted the article on the premise that it was not edited than you have made a mistake, and I would like the article restored. In fact, it is very likely good enough now in its current shape to be posted as a restored article, which is what I would like done. Thank you... Stevenmitchell (talk) 00:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stevenmitchell well if that were true i'm sure it wouldn't be deleted. Any article that makes it to the stale draft database is most certainly fit the criteria under WP:G13 as the draft was not edited in over 6 months. You can however request that the article be put back into draft via WP:REFUND or contact deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 08:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lapablo. Yes, you are partially correct in that the article has not been revised in 6 months. However, 6 months ago, the article had been finished in its draft place revision over the course of the previous 8 months or so, so that is why the article shows no revisions since August 20 of 2019 (which would still make it less than 6 months according to my records). Until your deletion, this article had been sitting in a draft holding place for longer than the past year, when it was originally placed in a draft holding place. I assumed it would be republished when it was reviewed upon its expiration, and compared to the original article that was nominated for deletion - its original 6 month wait period having expired sometime in the early summer of 2019 - and that it would be approved following the duration of that period. However, that has not happened and instead you have, without any knowledge of the article's previous history, deleted it. How do I get it restored, reviewed and republished as a viable, live article on Wikipedia? Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So who is the deleting administrator, since you have deleted all of the information? I would need that name and the information to have it restored and published. I didn't realize until I read your front page that you are just an editor like I am, with no administrative authority... Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fastily, Author of Draft:Central Asian-American Enterprise Fund is requesting WP:REFUND for his draft. Kindly help with this. Lapablo (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	hi. my article was rejected please let me know why? i am a singer from sri lanka. please help me Roja Sivakumar (talk) 13:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:28:53, 26 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Navintc

Navintc (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Threta Revelations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Lepablo, Thanks a bunch for reviewing my article on Threta Revelations. This is the first time I wrote a wikipage and I cant understand where I did bad. But for me it seems that the sources I provided are not enough. Or is it how I cited and wrote the html? Regards, Navintc.

Navintc (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Navintc, Thanks for your edits on Wikipedia once again. Unfortunately i reviewed your article as not meeting notability guidelines because the sources you provided are not Reliable sources per the standard set. Youtube is not considered reliable, you need publications that are of in-depth third-party news sources overall.

I hope i was able to help you. Lapablo (talk) 10:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 01:15:08, 9 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Bagelinablender

Bagelinablender (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Donovan Duncan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, can you help me make this page? This is a major businessman with sources from major, independent media outlets, but it looks like this page has been denied. I'm not sure what to do. Bagelinablender (talk) 01:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bagelinablender, They're not enough sources that is Reliable sources to have the page published. In as much as the company is notable, notability cannot be inherited in this case. Kindly read WP:BASIC. 13:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Lapablo (talk)

I'm a bit confused as to that guidance, though - he's considered notable enough to be interviewed by industry magazines (and talked about in the industry in general), New York Times, Forbes, etc, but that's not rising to the level needed here? What would be considered notable in this case? Bagelinablender (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bagelinablender if you do have publications on the subject from Forbes, New York Times and others as you claim, kindly add it to the article and re-submit for review. Lapablo (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft nominated for deletion

Not cool to delete a draft article literally moments after nominating it. That gave me no time to react. Thmazing (talk) 20:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thmazing You can always request WP:REFUND. Lapablo (talk) 22:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, but that's a hassle. If I'd had a day, it wouldn't have been necessary. It just doesn't feel like assuming best intentions. Thmazing (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC) - upGrad moved to Draft space

Hello Lapablo, I appreciate your concern. I've tried to support the entire text with citations from independent sources. Please go through the citations and let me know what else is required. upGrad has reached the notability criteria in India and there are a lot of working professionals like me who would be interested in knowing more about it in the most neutral way. Best, (Kulwinder Rishi (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Hii i am RoZTaly. You have reviewed my last created article. can you tell me how can i improve my created articles? RoZTaly 05:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Article on Vasily Stavitsky

Hi, Lapablo!

I'm currently working on the article Vasily Stavitsky, which you moved to a draft.

I do realize it is still work in progress, and I'm willing to improve the article. I would appreciate any pointers from you such as what should be done to improve the quality of the article.

Providing more references is one thing, and I'm currently working on it. Is there anything else you would recommend me to do?

--Document hippo (talk) 08:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I particular, I see three directions in which the article could be improved:

1) Stavitsky is an author of several nonfiction books, as well as several volumes of poetry. They could be listed in the article.

2) Various biography trivia such as membership in organizations, occupations, awards, etc. His views on the current situation in the world, etc.

3) While working as a head of public relations of the FSB in 1999-2000, Stavitsky made numerous remarks about contemporary events which have been reflected in the media. So I could include the section about his work in the FSB, which is especially useful in terms of adding more references.

What do you think?

--Document hippo (talk) 09:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mitra Haji Najafi

Hello, can you tell me why this page mus delete speedily? She has been arrested several times in Iran and is an environmental activist, and has been mentioned in the media and human rights reports. please remove your tag. --Kavehfar (talk) 07:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kavehfar Just because a subject has been arrested multiple times and is an environmental activist doesn't warrant a page. They're guidelines that must be met when creating a page. Please read WIKIPEDIA:RS and WIKIPEDIA:SIGCOV. If you need any other assistance kindly reach out. Lapablo (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I remove some part of this page please see it. --Kavehfar (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also I used annual reports of the US Department of State, Amnesty International, FIDH, its not reliable source for this case?--Kavehfar (talk) 08:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DoneIt's solved by User:Deb.-Kavehfar (talk) 09:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavehfar: Although the reason given wasn't adequate for speedy deletion, the article could still be deleted for other reasons unless you improve it with better English and not so many red links. Deb (talk) 09:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: I'm trying to improve the page As you guided-Kavehfar (talk) 09:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: can you see again, please. deleted text without valid source and most red links were removed. Kavehfar (talk) 10:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: DiscoverCars.com

Hello Lapablo. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of DiscoverCars.com, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 12:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Link not working

Your link for " add a new thread to the bottom of the page " is redirecting to user :C.Fred, please edit it. Thanks Meme Lord 519 (talk) 09:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi

Hi, can I ask you to have a look at Draft:Nikolai Udianskyi before I submit it for review? --Perohanych (talk) 07:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clout News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clout News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clout News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Schazjmd (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on some AfC work

Hey, I'm following up on some concerning edits from an editor that you've interacted with at AfC on a draft of Ehraz Ahmed. On your first review of the page, you placed a template on the submitting editor's talk page, which they don't appear to have ever responded to. A few weeks later, they contacted you on your talk page and you proceeded to accept the revision. The article is much improved, but were your COI-related concerns actually ever addressed? I can't seem to find any disclosure or denial of a COI. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

following up on the speedy deletion of Nicole Asinugo

Greetings Lapablo! I just took time to create that article and still creating it before it's deleted. I'm very much aware of the requirement for adequate references and I'm still working on it before it got deleted. Besides, I thought a seven day notice is usually given before deletion and this is barely up to a day. This is also not my first time creating articles this way. You would at least drop me a message on my talk page reminding me of this instead deleting this immediately. Sometimes this could hurt and very discouraging considering alot Of work that's put into this. Ptinphusmia (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ptinphusmia Hello thanks for reaching out. However your article isn't deleted but rather moved into draft space to enable you edit and develop the article to a better standing so as to meet our guidelines. You can find your article here. Do let me know if you need any further assistance. Lapablo (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmission

Hello I have greatly improved Draft:Ranveer Allahbadia please review.106.207.202.58 (talk) 06:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello, I want to make some articles. My question is whether we can make reference to other languages on English Wikipedia. Such as a reference to the Hindi language. Please explain. Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 13:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bikaneri, I'm sorry but you cannot use Wikipedia links as reference or sources in articles. Sources have to be from reliable news websites. I hope i've been able to help. Lapablo (talk) 13:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 13:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Draft:Ranveer Allahbadia have been greatly improved, please review

Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Lapablo today my page Bigbasket was tagged for speedy deletion, reason promotional content, kindly let me know the promotional content in the page so I could edit it accordingly. and just want to check if the decision could be reversedGlittershield (talk) 14:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

submission decline contested

Jacob Kwaku Gyan == Hi Lapablo, I appreciate your time to review the page Jacob Kwaku Gyan. However,the reason given for declining the page is my contention. You refer to the subject as just being mentioned in references provided. However, I am of the viee that a careful read of the references will prove otherwise. The subject was actually being discussed. Respectively take time to rrad through again. However, if you still feel it does not meet the criteria,kindly assist me to shape it up because I think the subject meets the notability test. Regards. Pagefour (talk) 17:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you decline?

Can you tell why you declare Draft:Ranveer Allahbadia? Please explain in simple easy words. And tell which line was the fault. Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help creating article

Hello I am writing an article on an Indian YouTuber, will you help me in writing my article. I ask you for your contribution to that article Help me please. Don't disappoint me by saying no. Hope for you. Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bikaneri, I can only advise and guide you but i can't write it for you as am currently engaged with other projects i wish to take on. I wish i could be of more help. Lapablo (talk) 22:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Central Asian-American Enterprise Fund

Hi. How do I undo the damage that you have done in the deletion of an article that was ready to be published? I have requested several times to have the draft that you deleted restored, per the Wikipedia instructions that you provided, with zero responses over the last 3 months. How do I actually get this thing restored? Stevenmitchell (talk) 02:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the problem that there were 2 draft pages produced? The first which you deleted, and the 2nd which was a restored deleted working draft (connected to the 1st) that was erroneously deleted prematurely, and restored by the deletionists and that had been developed further and was ready for posting? Stevenmitchell (talk) 02:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stevenmitchell, Here's a draft i found Draft:Central Asian-American Enterprise Fund, i am however not certain if its the first or second draft. It is imperative for you to know that when drafts are left abandoned for over 6 months it automatically qualifies for WP:G13 under abandoned draft, Read WP:NOTHOSTING. I hope i've been able to assist you. Lapablo (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stevenmitchell, Since you've started editing the draft again, i believe that is the right page. Happy Editing. Lapablo (talk) 05:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lapablo, thank you for your assistance. I believe what was restored was the latest revision... Stevenmitchell (talk) 06:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Cronin (footballer)

Hi @Lapablo. On Draft:Tommy Cronin (footballer), you stated that the article needed more reliable sources. I don't blame you for not knowing this, but WikiProject Football has a list of reliable sources in which Neil Brown's website is listed. Hugman's website is also used as a reliable source of many footballers of the 1950s and 60s (such as Brian Bates and Jimmy Adam). I would encourage you to reconsider my drafting. Lettler^hello 14:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lettler Kindly submit through AFC and i'll review it for you. Best regards Lapablo (talk) 08:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page review

Thank you for reviewing the article I moved PingerNg (talk) 09:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okezone

Hello, the article I created relates to the 23rd most clicked website in the world according to the most accepted meter tool - List of most popular websites. By creating this page, a number of users outside Indonesia would find some useful details about this otherwise unknown website. I disagree about reverting a page to draft, not permitting other Users (mainly from Indonesia) to contribute to it, and organically expanding it.

By reverting it to Draft and consequently requesting only to the same user (me) to improve it, you prevent others to help slowly developing the page via many contributions, as per Wikipedia usual standards. Additionally after reverting it to draft, and already making clear your position, you also nominated yourself as the reviewer of the draft, making this the most undemocratic process ever witnessed on Wikipedia. The page has indeed a number of references (adequate to a 230 bytes length), and after adding further Book sources you still rejected it. Let others reviewing and work on it. Just as info I created a number of pages in different fields that tend to have an average of 200-300 readers x day. I believe Okezone would possibly attract the same interest, or similar to the pages related to other top 20 websites more clicked globally. Goodwillgames (talk) 10:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodwillgames, for a website ranked 23rd on the "most clicked website in the world" there should be more sources to support the article online. The sources you provided are however NOT sufficient. I have also removed Okezone from List of most popular websites which you added yourself. kindly read WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV to get a better idea of what is needed. Lapablo (talk) 10:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the page on, and some of the 100 million people living in Indonesia shall add more sources within hours Goodwillgames (talk) 10:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page created has more sources than the same page created in Wikipedia Indonesia id:Okezone.com. You are not the correct reviewer for this page, as you seem focused or interested on Western or European only related topics. Let a reviewer in Asia to decide if the sources are not adequate and if the page is relevant enough Goodwillgames (talk) 11:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have signalled me for vandalism for linking a Wikipedia page to an existing Wikipedia Indonesia page. My draft was absolutely sound, with enough references and drafted by translating the corresponding article on Wikipedia Indonesia (created in 2007). Your attempt not to permit the creation of the article by removing Okezone from the page List of most popular websites shows your non neutral instance not to permit to any users to develop this topic or to allow my draft to successfully pass a review. I don't think you are showing much integrity on this instance, apart from your will to be a deletionist Goodwillgames (talk) 14:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Carpages.ca

Hello Lapablo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Carpages.ca, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It needs work, but it's not unsalvegable. Sources and award nomination enough for A7. No comment on GNG. Thank you. Ged UK 10:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rikkeisoft

I live in the area close to the company and was asked by my neighbor, if I wanted to try. I am not being paid. I don't like revealing personal information because it triggers my anxiety. Put my article back up please. I worked very hard on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleVietnam (talk • contribs) 11:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

link=User talk:<Lapablo>

Hello, Lapablo. You have new messages at [[User talk:<Lapablo>|User talk:<Lapablo>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

We need to talk immediately.

link=User talk:<Lapablo>

Hello, Lapablo. You have new messages at [[User talk:<Lapablo>|User talk:<Lapablo>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

We need to talk.

@KyleVietnam:, So your neighbor asked you to try to create a page for Rikkeisoft that is correct yes? Does he in anyway work for the company or have any ties with the company? Coming out plain can go a long way to help you get your article up if criteria for inclusion is met. Lapablo (talk) 11:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review Feedback Please

Hi Lapablo

Thanks for your review of my Experience Travel Group page. Can you provide more specific feedback onto which citations didn't meet Wikipedia's expectations so I can edit them or remove that particular topic?

Thanks

Helpseo7pp 07:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Helpseo7pp (talk)

Helpseo7pp (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feel confused about the references

Hi, I do not understand why my references are not reliable.

All of them are quoted from the websites of:

1) Nasdaq
2) Cboe Global Markets Inc.
3) Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX)
4) ShangHai Stock Exchange
5) ShenZhen Stock Exchange (SZSE)
6) The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室)
7) News media

Could you please kindly point out which one is not reliable?
And also what else are further needed.
Feel free to ask for more information or elaboration.
Thank you so much.

@Lapablo: Message text. Michellewiki1992 (talk) 07:49, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Demon

Haha, you beat me to it ! I was in the process of tagging the Danny Erskine article with a G11 & with the salt template when I observed you beat me to it by 6 seconds. Celestina007 (talk) 10:55, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 Fastest finger first lol, He's quite persistent on getting the page up going as far as adding unreferenced content about being given a contract by Warner music. Also he's also creating page for himself. Keep up the good work though. Cheers. Lapablo (talk) 10:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lapablo, lmao fastest fingers first indeed. Keep up the good work too. Cheers! Celestina007 (talk) 11:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:44:10, 19 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Helpseo7pp

Helpseo7pp (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Experience Travel Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

@Helpseo7pp:, Thanks for dropping in on my talk page, unfortunately the subject doesn't meet our Notability Guidelines and in its current form only serves to promote the company. I would advise allowing the company to gain more coverage by the media. Best regards. Lapablo (talk) 11:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hector Morales (diplomat)

Hi@Lapablo. I edited Draft:Hector Morales (diplomat). The information is literally paraphrased from his state department website and thus belong to the public domain so I did not see how any of that is still violating copyright rules. CatchedY (talk) 12:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My content was not approved

My draft ADESUWA RENEEE OGIOZEE was not apporved because you said the subject is not notable according to secondary source. Please what do you mean and i can i fix that Youngbossred (talk) 19:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eachwick has been accepted

Eachwick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lapablo (talk) 16:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Lapablo, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Get back to me

- KyleVietnam

@KyleVietnam:, Hope editors have been able to resolve your complaints as i've been away for a while now. Lapablo (talk) 02:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Jeffries

Hello, I would encourage you to re-look at the page as I added substantial information, at least 3 articles that show extended coverage (New York Times, Washington Post, Fortune) that are not "trivial mentions", as well a book on New York Real Estate that featured him in one chapter, in addition to his new mixed-use development formula being featured in a hotel management textbook, and multiple other articles that featured him in interviews and so on. Every sentence is at least supported with one reference. I don't know what else I need to do to fit the notability criteria. CatchedY (talk) 23:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of page Bigbasket

Hi Lapablo greetings of the day, my draft Bigbasket was tagged for deletion reason promotional content could you please assist me to clear up the promotional content of my page Thank youGlittershield (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Glittershield:, While i believe the subject is notable it is also clear that the language on the page needs to be toned down a bit. There's a whole lot of funding round statements which appears promotional, i will see if i can trim it down and move it to mainspace. Best regards. Lapablo (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lapablo Greetings of the day, thank you very much for taking time to get the page cleaned up. Best regard02:58, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Glittershield (talk)

Guy Feldman

Thanks for trying to improve the article. Turns out I found the same article you did about the spying but if you read it well, Feldman only gets a passing mention. Gonen Segev was the person that was arrested and an Israeli Independence Day party hosted by Feldman was mentioned. I couldn’t find any information that Feldman was investigated let alone arrested and charges. But if you find anything that states Feldman was charged, feel free to add it! Postcard Cathy (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of the Article for Olabisi Akanbi which you moved to Draft

Greetings, you recently moved a page I created to draft for want of more reference sources, I will like you to review the page as more reference sources were added to the page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delords (talk • contribs) 11:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Delords:, I will go ahead and check. Expect feedback soon. Best. Lapablo (talk) 15:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Lapablo:, just checking to know if there's any feedback on the page review. Hoping to hear from you. Best regards. Delords (talk) 11:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

At ArtistWorks, you remove the tags I added, and in your edit summary you write "afd eligible (prodding)." Yet you neither prod nor send it to afd. Did you intend to do one of these? Sam-2727 (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam-2727:, I'm sorry i had submitted that but it seems it didnt go through my internet over here is glitchy. I'll re-prod it. Lapablo (talk) 13:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm John from Idegon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Obua Ajukwu, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

John from Idegon (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation and References

Hello,

I have cited top world sites where are idayat articles appear, sites like Washington post, the hill, BBC. so I seem to don't understand what you mean by reliable sources.

Is the BBC not a reliable source? Is All African not a reliable source Is the Hill not a reliable source? Is Washinton's post not a reliable source? Is New York times not a reliable source? Is chartam house not a reliable source?

Pls kindly answer. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kayhan2341 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kayhan2341: My main reason for moving page was "Needs to be generally re-written to conform with Wikipedia guidelines, currently it serves to promote the subject", the subject may or may not be notable that you've cited sources like BBC, other reliable soruces which i have gone through are all in passing mention, an article she wrote or authored on her own cannot be used as a source. Read WP:AEIS. Lapablo (talk) 07:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf note

Hello. I saw your note on DA's page about Draft:The Wolf of Gubbio, and added a reference from the Minister of Culture and a reference section. This should authenticate it, so please have another look towards mainspacing the page. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Randy Kryn:, I will have to add more sources myself and move it to mainspace. Thanks for calling my attention to this. Lapablo (talk) 11:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Artworks usually pass muster with one good source, especially from a museum catalogue which I tried quickly to find for this one, but the ministry seemed to cover it. Good to have another wolf painting floating in cyberspace. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. Lapablo (talk) 12:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Manyenyeni moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bernard Manyenyeni, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 14:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

draft time

Hello User:Lapablo, please help me regarding one question, is teher any correct time for drafts, i mean any term after how many days draft will gonna to main article, sorry for bad english: --ERJANIK (talk) 16:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ERJANIK:, Sure thing, there's no precise time on when drafts are reviewed. There's a huge backlog on drafts and because of that some drafts may take time to be reviewed but surely definitely someone will get to it. Just be patient. Hope i've been able to answer your question. Lapablo (talk) 08:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you: --ERJANIK (talk) 07:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GUIDANCE TO WORK ON

DEAR LAPABLE,

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY MY DRAT WASN'T APPROVED? I HAVE NO ASSOCIATION WITH THE PERSON & HAVE INCLUDED A LOT OF LINKS TO SHOW HOW MY DATA ABOUT HIM WAS CORRECT.

CAN YOU PLEASE HELP.

REGARDS RADHIKA SINGH — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shankar.ssc99 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shankar.ssc99: Reviewing your article again i noticed that there's still a lot you haven't done after the last review. I had pointed out that Twitter is not a reliable source. Your articles from Asian age is more or less like a PR that was also re-published on Deccan Chronicle. You will need to provide independent sources before resubmitting. Lapablo (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manns

Hey. You very kindly reviewed my second article attempt recently, which was for Jonathan Manns. I had tried to provide a wide variety of sources which reference his work/thought (ie. books and newspapers), where these seemed relevant and high quality. Whilst I very-much appreciate all the work you've done so far, I wonder whether you might be able to suggest how it could be improved? Is there any area in particular you think needs further referencing, for example, to make this suitable for publication? There's a fair amount on Google, so I'm confident that I could expand the content or provide more references for some of the news items if this would help? . . . . You'll see I've now added further sources, all from print publications in inter/national mainstream and trade media, to reinforce the points made. I'm now at 64 references. It would be good to get a steer on where further reinforcement would be beneficial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turningworldly (talk • contribs) 14:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Engblu - page re installed.

Hi, I hope this is the correct way of reaching you. Thank you for reinstalling my draft page, it's very much appreciated.

I see it's been edited and i wondered if you could let me know why certain elements were removed ? Was it too "fluffy" and not direct enough ? Wat i mean is the descriptions i put into the text have gone. I'm curious as I see other pages with similar description styles.

Any other comments on the contents would be appreciated.

CheersEngblu (talk) 21:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cauldon has been accepted

Cauldon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lapablo (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promising draft

Hi, before you nominate G13s can you please check whether the draft has been tagged as Promising draft as that should rule out the G13, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bending Spoons moved to draftspace

Hi Lapablo, Many thanks for your input on the Bending Spoons page. Would you mind explaining to me why using Great Place to Work as a source isn’t valid? It appears to meet all the criteria. Thanks again, keep doing what you do! --FarewellTransmission (talk) 15:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I expanded the Bending Spoons page draft, and added more references. I also submitted the draft for review. Could you please take a look? Thanks! --FarewellTransmission (talk) 10:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hogeschool VIVES has been accepted

Hogeschool VIVES, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lapablo (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hemmersbach Rhino Force Edits

Dear Lapablo,

Thanks for your advice on the page Hemmersbach Rhino Force. I have edited it to remove non-wiki tone and language making it much less promotional. Please take a look when you have time and let me know if you would now allow me to re-post it. In case my link doesn't work here is another https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hemmersbach_Rhino_Force?action=edit Thanks very much, User_talk:MichaelDubley —Preceding undated comment added 03:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, the article still looks promotional, it would need to be trimmed down. May i ask if you have a WP:COI with the subject? Lapablo (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I know you more, check this.

I wish to know you bro. Please drop any of your contact details or social media handles so I can reach out to you. Mrniger (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrniger: I'm not sure dropping or divulging my personal information here is a good idea. You can try sending me a wiki mail though. Lapablo (talk) 21:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright Lapablo,

Thanks for your contribution to the draft page Draft:Ehigie Ikeakhe. I have restructure the page's story to meet the encyclopedia articles neutral point of view, and added a range of independent, reliable, published sources into the article. At this point, I am so much optimistic about https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ehigie_Ikeakhe being moved to the article space and look forward to your response to that. Thank you @Lapablo Mrniger (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:49:42, 14 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by HA1755

HA1755 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dr. Harinder Pal Singh Ahluwalia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, Last week, I submitted an article, but it was not accepted. Thank you for providing your comments on the submitted article. Following your feedback, the text was revised and was resubmitted today (July 14, 2020). Please let me know if the changes that were made are acceptable. Thank you, Wendy HA1755 (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC) HA1755 (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you for your comments. The article I created Somdutta Singh was delete. I edited the article with notable citations and submitted again. But the submitted article was not approved for publish. I have resubmitted the article. I created the article since I read about the notable person and found not fin don Wiki. I have not been compensated to create the article. Thanks PUJADAS211 , 15 July 2020

Done. Replied on article talk page. Lapablo (talk) 19:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article review

Thank you for reviewing the revised article and for providing your comments. As a new user and this being the first time I am trying to post an article on Wikipedia, I would very much appreciate receiving additional assistance in making the required changes so that it can be accepted. Please advise as to who I could contact in this regard. HA1755 (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance on AfC submission by HA1755

Thank you for reviewing the revised article and for providing your comments. As a new user and this being the first time I am trying to post an article on Wikipedia, I would very much appreciate receiving additional assistance in making the required changes so that it can be accepted. Please advise whether you can provide further guidance or if there is someone else I could contact in this regard. HA1755 (talk) 16:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Nevin Page

Added additional references as requested, all international or national sources. please approve Kquill2020eire (talk) 08:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, replied. Lapablo (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The sources listed are not trivial mentions, they are specific and from national publications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kquill2020eire (talk • contribs) 18:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you say Anushka Anirban Sen's Article is paid.

This is very demotivating for me. I am not paid for it I am 16 year guy. As she is telivision actress, So I have written this Article. Also you should Check out my Articles on Simple Wikipedia too. What do you think, is R K Narayan paid me? ,is Chetan Bhagat paid me ?, is K. Sivan paid me?, is Amravati (city) paid me?, University of Delhi paid me?, is Sushant Singh Rajput paid me to write about Dil Bechara, to write their articles in simple wikipedia. If you think the article is not notable you can delete the article but please do not write there that is paid. I am very sad and not going to write any article in English Wikipedia...... XmanAuthor (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have submitted the draft for the subject named, Hanaan Choudhary which has been reviewed by you and stated that is it not accepted. I have gathered information from national newspapers and publications about this person which are completely about him in editorial form and not just passing mentions and he's a doctor. Which is why i was hoping to make an simple article about him. This is my first article on Wikipedia. I am a full time chef and a writer. Please help in improving this article and getting it approved. Thank you so much Abhianand25 (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)abhianand25[reply]

Decline Pradipta Biswas Draft page

In the context of declining draft:Pradipta_Biswas, may I ask whether a Gates Cambridge Scholarship, which is awarded to approximately 80 persons worldwide each year and a co-chairman position at an UN agency (ITU IRG-AVA, https://www.itu.int/en/irg/ava/Pages/default.aspx ) qualifies the following two clauses at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)

The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.

The following pages can substantiate academic impact https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=Pyj57Y4AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=14007579800 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradipta Biswas (talk • contribs) 06:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GIG Logistics

Hi Lapablo, I have now added a Conflict Of Interest (COI) disclosure to Draft:GIG Logistics Jidara (talk) 09:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to provide a COI disclosure on my talk page, but this has now been done accordingly. Jidara (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jidara:, You'll need to make full disclosure as to where, how and when you were hired to make the page. best regards. Lapablo (talk) 13:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

REAZN Group Draft

Hi Lapablo, I say that you declined the submission for the article about "REAZN GROUP". For me, the article seems not to cause any issues, because all facts are linked to international references from Germany, France, Belgium and the UK. And with a revenue of 245 mio. €, the organization is of public interest. As the article does not promote the company, it seems to be alright for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor-matt-19 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Editor-matt-19: Just because the company has over "245 mio. €" in revenue doesn't make it WP:N. Kindly add reliable sources that can demonstrate notability of the subject. Lapablo (talk) 12:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BluSmart Page

Hey Lapablo, based on your feedback in the review, I have added more references in the Article. The search result of BluSmart company has gone up in India over the last 3 months, so it would great if you can review the new submission and share your feedback soon.

Bhasinarjun (talk) 12:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 31 July 2020[reply]

@Bhasinarjun:, Do you have a Conflict of Interest with the subject or have you been hired to create a page for the company? If so, you are required to make a full disclosure on your userpage. Lapablo (talk) 12:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your reply. I'm not getting paid for this article and I drafted this article just out of my curiosity for the Electric vehicles and the EV trend in India. My article is neutral and I have tried to share all the available knowledge through that article. Please let me know the steps to prove that I'm not getting paid. Thanks!

--Bhasinarjun (talk) 17:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhasinarjun: there are a couple of policies & guidelines you should familiarize yourself with before proceeding to resubmit the article. In this case I’d say start with WP:YFA, then proceed to WP:GNG. Once you've understood the policies and feel that the page meets all policies you can resubmit. Lapablo (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lapablo: Thank you so much for sharing the links. Now, I'm confident enough that I'm in the right direction and my article meets all the requirements. In-fact I have also added the required citations for the reference. The citation links are also from independent press houses. I would again like to confirm that no monetary exchange is involved in my actions and the article is widely covered by the Indian media in the past 1 year. Thanks!

--Bhasinarjun (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftspace

Hi You have recently moved two main shipping lines to the Draft space. I only created these articles because they already exist in German. Sources in German are enough for notability rules. Could you Revert your move? Thanks --Arorae (talk) 21:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Arorae: Yes i made a revert on the two articles about the shipping line because you can't just create articles in mainspace without adding any sources even though they're in German. Once you add necessary sources i will be very happy to move and review for you in mainspace, Best regards. Lapablo (talk) 21:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your move to Draft space was unnecessary

Ministry of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development has been replaced again in the Main with all the other (stub and still incomplete) articles of the Cabinet of Kiribati. I do hope that on next time or next occasion, you will be a little more aware, respectful and a little more open-minded — in my very humble opinion —. Of course, even if you was not of the same idea, I would like to let you know this situation. With my best regards.-Arorae (talk) 02:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GIG Logistics

@Lapablo: I have now included my employer, their location and the date I was hired to create the draft in my talk page disclosure. Kindly review the draft and apologies for the back and forth.Jidara (talk) 22:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For publication: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dobromir_Slavchev

o4.08.2020 - Hello Lapablo (talk) I ask for your cooperation! Please see Draft: Dobromir Slavchev, all shortcomings mentioned by the editor have been removed. Reliable sources are provided for the reliability of the information, such as the Bulgarian National Television, prestigious national local publications for literature and others. With respect Kristina Monbat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristina Monbat (talk • contribs) 07:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:42:53, 4 August 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Aleksas The True

Aleksas The True (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Paysera (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Lapablo,

Thank you for your quick review. I declared my conflict of interest writing an article about Paysera. At the same time I made my best trying to write as neutral as possible as there is no such article in English. It's a pity because it is international company. I can probably agree that some data lacks sources. Half information were taken from company's web page and I did not want to repeat. My mistake.

Still, I wonder why did it appear as an advertisement because the structure of sentences and structure of whole article is based on the existing Wikipedia articles about biggest payment gateway and digital payment companies: Paypal, Stripe, Monese, Revolut.

What concerns advertisement, please let me understand:

Is it wrong to say that "our company has the biggest market share", if this is true and the source is central bank? Is it wrong to list several services in neutral manner with no call to action" or saying that their are leading services, etc, if other market participants (or other contributors) do list companies services?

I would be grateful if you would help to make the article meet Wikipedia requirements. Especially since the published article could be updated in by other Wikipedia contributors when such a possibility does not exist at present.

Aleksas The True (talk) 10:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

link=User talk:<Grunen22>

Hello, Lapablo. You have new messages at [[User talk:<Grunen22>|User talk:<Grunen22>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tony Doellefeld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Doellefeld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Doellefeld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have caused much damage, face the consequences

Hello Lapablo, You are a senior editor deleting articles at will without consideration of how the creators of such articles feel after putting in so much effort in creating them. I created an article with no conflict of interest but you came and took it down for being under sourced. Did you know how I felt? But now you have to have a feel of what we feel when you delete articles. I want to make sure that you are blocked from editing WP. This is not your father's property but you took it upon yourself to destroy other people's efforts. But what do you gain from such behavior. At last you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and when this is done I will be happy. I will also stop editing Wikipedia because I have nothing to lose when I do so. I have no special interest here. I only do it to contribute to this pool of knowledge. All three articles I created here were taken down by you within three weeks of creation as if you were the only editor here. My grievance with you is that you do not obey rules. You placed yourself above the the rules and its very bad. Supolsanko (talk) 19:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello Lapablo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lapablo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lapablo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 19:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Catching my breath and cooling off, but I have questions about the uwerboxen --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BoogzDaBeast Submission Declined

@Lapabo: This is a major producer for major rap and r&b artists who works for Kanye West's label G.O.O.D. Music. Because he is a music producer and doesn't do interviews, he is not the major feature of any articles. His discography speaks for itself. I don't understand why he can't have a wikipedia page with mentions in articles that confirm his works of music. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BipBip53 (talk • contribs) 14:27, August 15, 2020 (UTC)

@BipBip53:, If the subject of the article is notable, then there should be interviews or features of him on reliable news websites not withstanding if he's a producer for Kanye West. Read WP:TRIVIALMENTION to understand why the subject can't have a Wikipedia page with mentions in articles. I hope i was able to help. Let me know if you need further assistance. Lapablo (talk) 09:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting

Hi Lapablo

Hope you are great in past you have reviewed few of my articles, i usually create the article direct and don't use draft but this time my drafts are taking longer time than usual. Can i blank the draft and publish the article direct if Wikipedia allows? the articles are passing WP:GNG WP:NPOV and of course notable.

Last three article contribution: Anna Higgs, Draft:Misbah_Mumtaz, Draft:Nick_Wrenn

If you can look into this i shall be thankful to you.

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 09:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Memon KutianaWala: If it is taking time to be reviewed it is probably because of the huge backlog we have at WP:AFC. There's no point having the article recreated in Mainspace, wait for a review on the draft which you have submitted. Hopefully someone will get to it soon. Best regards, Lapablo (talk) 08:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC) .[reply]

Thanks Lapablo Memon KutianaWala (talk) 08:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GIG Logistics

@Lapablo: I am following up on my last message which has now been archived and I'm not sure if you managed to see it. Here is the message I sent earlier: "I have now included my employer, their location and the date I was hired to create the draft in my talk page disclosure. Kindly review the draft and apologies for the back and forth."Jidara (talk) 08:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Hi @Lapablo. Thanks for your feedback concerning my draft Ifiesimama Melvin Sekibo. He is actually a notable personality. His colleagues in the banking industry in Nigeria, the likes of Segun Agbaje ( CEO GTBANK ) all have Wikipedia accounts. I have provided references just as those guys please kindly take a second look at my draft. Ifiesimama Melvin Sekibo (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ifiesimama Melvin Sekibo (talk) 16:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Ifiesimama Melvin Sekibo

Ifiesimama Sekibo deserves a Wikipedia Page Dear Editor, Top of the day to you. This appeal is in respect of the Wikipedia page being planned for Mr. Ifiesimama Sekibo, the pioneer Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Bank, Nigeria’s most innovative bank, since 2014.

We understand your efforts in making sure that the page is not over flogged but it is our belief that the page will become richer if Mr. Sekibo’s profile is listed among the many accomplished personalities and institutions therein.

With a degree in accountancy from the University of Science & Technology, Port Harcourt, he is also an alumnus of Harvard Business School OPM Class (2006-2009), and has a Ph.D. Credit Management from the London Post Graduate Credit Management College, UK, an affiliate of American University, London.

Mr. Sekibo is a respected banker in Nigeria renown for returning moribund institutions to the path of sustained profitability. Some of the institutions he had led to the path of profit was Monipulo Limited, a petroleum development company as its Financial Controller/Head of Admin from 1999 to 2002, from where he moved to International Energy Insurance (IEI) Plc as the Group Managing Director from 2003 to 2009 before moving to Heritage Bank in late 2009 and went on to lead the team to acquire Enterprise Bank and got a national license which made Heritage Bank a national bank in 2014.

Heritage Bank’s success is based on its excellent service culture hinged on partnering with the customer to create wealth through the provision of seamless banking experience, accurate and relevant information to its customers across Nigeria and a part of this is attributable to the impact of Mr. Sekibo.

Heritage Bank’s success story which began on March 4, 2012, is a story of hard work and determination. When IEI Investments Ltd acquired Societe Generale Bank of Nigeria (SGBN) license from the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, after meeting all requirements by Nigeria’s apex bank. Heritage Bank Plc was born and began its operations in Nigeria as a regional bank on March 14, 2013. After acquiring the license and structure of the old SGBN which was closed down by the CBN for failing to meet the new capital requirements of N25 billion or $155 million for a national bank in January 2006, Heritage Bank returned 100 percent of existing SGBN account holders’ money which were frozen at the closure of the SGBN. This move brought a lot of smiles to the faces of former account holders with a majority of them having the confidence to continue to bank with Heritage. This was the beginning of a success story of a bank that was dead for 10years before it was resurrected by Mr. Ifie Sekibo and his team.

Part of the innovations from Heritage Bank started when it introduced a zero Cost of Transaction to its customers in April 2013, implying that there would be no hidden charges as it continued its quest for 100 percent customer satisfaction. Heritage Bank also set a standard when it launched its pilot ‘Corner Shop’ to cater to traders at the Gbagada Plank Market in Gbagada Estate, Lagos to ease banking. The ‘Corner Shop’ was widely received and appreciated by the Gbagada traders as it saved them the time and money to visit a bank branch kilometers away.

Heritage Bank was not done yet. The bank went further to prove its trend-setting profile by introducing Nigeria’s first pioneer portable POS solution named ‘PortaPOS”. The Heritage PortaPOS which is free to all Heritage Bank customers can accept all EMV chip and PIN cards, MasterCard, Verve and Visa cards. It is portable and light as a regular mobile phone and has a long-lasting and rechargeable battery. It also syncs with phones and printers via Bluetooth technology!

Aside from the attempt to record his contributions to humanity with the Wikipedia listing, he is a known mentor of the youths in Nigeria and Africa. Sekibo has been involved in mentoring the youths over the years despite his busy schedule. He is involved in mentorship and giving direction to the youths and has led several business forums for entrepreneurs and mentorship sessions both within Nigeria and outside Nigeria.

We will be glad if his Wikipedia page can be speedily approved for the young and upcoming generation to know about his exploits and how he is interested in the growth of the country, especially with the partnership with Dukia Gold, where Heritage Bank, under him wants to be part of those that will boost Nigeria’s economy from a mono-dependent one to that generating revenue from multiple sources. His exploits can be gotten under Heritage Bank Wikipedia page. Thank you

Ifiesimama Melvin Sekibo (talk) 19:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion on wrong grounds

Hi Lapablo, thank you for reviewing the page I created today about the musician and composer David August. I have read through all the information on the notability criteria and David August meets more than one of those criteria. His music has been released on multiple notable record labels, he has toured worldwide over the last decade and has been covered by all of the most notable dance music media outlets. Could you please be more clear on why exactly his page has been nominated for speedy deletion?

25.08.2020Unabibi (talk) 19:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)unabibiUnabibi (talk) 19:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Club logo and badge of Dakkada FC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Club logo and badge of Dakkada FC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stealing Share

After reviewing the Wikipedia guidelines and editing the post again, there is no promotional content in the citing. It only states cited facts. Mikevan9 (talk) 17:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chris G. Hollins

I have updated the submission with some additional independent references, but, otherwise, I am unclear as to why it seems that Mr. Hollins is not notable. He has received significant coverage in multiple published[ secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, some (but not all) of which are used in as citations in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BostickLaw (talk • contribs) 18:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indica search

Hi Lapablo,

We have added all the links and references. In comparison with other company entries, we are quite complete. Please advice what you would like more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Indica_Search — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.181.74.202 (talk) 10:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* What do you mean when you say we, i'm guessing you're publishing unbehalf of your company? Lapablo (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Please switch to the Indica search talk site? scherp11 14:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kate Shemirani

Thank you for reviewing the article. I agree, at the time I originally submitted it, the subject had not yet received significant enough coverage in any reliable secondary sources. Perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON, however Ms Shemirani was recently the subject of a Times Article which I think pushes the article above the required threshold. I'm going to re-submit the article for review, but I would definitely appreciate a second review. --Salimfadhley (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have an objection, I will move this article out of draft today or tomorrow. --Salimfadhley (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Please let me know why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Karthik_Muthukumar this was declined. I have provided all the news references other than IMDB since you said it is not valid. Please help me create the page

* Reason why your page was declined has been stated as follows, "Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability - Note IMDB is not a reliable source ". Let me know if you need any further assistance. Lapablo (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: IceTre

Hello an article that was submitted from Draft to Approval, “IceTre” was placed back into the draft stage with an acceptable reasoning. This is what was put

“This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia”.

Now with that being said, #11 states “Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network”. And #12 states “Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network”.

Their is capability within caliber to have the musician featured across major television networks such as VH1, BET Jams, MTV, Music Choice, etc. If the artist obtains the television network placements, with links and proof, would that be enough to suffice an approval? There is just an understanding of being on the same page so if so then the team can get working on the task. Thank you. Bunkytrap34 (talk) 08:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "The Team" are you referring the media team of IceTre? If so please read Conflict of Interest and make necessary disclosure. Lapablo (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, the team of researchers that have web crawled information for the article in question, such as correct citational links. This has been implemented from the beginning of the article’s Draft stage to ensure the proper insertion of relevant information which has been done independently from the article subject and their media relations. Bunkytrap34 (talk) 01:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

upload the Photos

hey sir, @Lapablo, will you please upload the supporting photos to my Draft Article (Aadil Manzoor Peer), Please let me know if you will, then i will send you all the supporting photos. thanking you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Growthsakup (talk • contribs) 18:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Review Karate Combat

Hi Lapablo,

Can you re-review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Karate_Combat? Reason for decline was "not showing significant coverage". By now NBC Sports^[1]. has also covered Karate Combat and a new season has started. I think it's enough published, reliable, secondary coverage.

Best regards, Aurelius Aurelius Lie (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BluSmart_Mobility

Hey @Lapablo:, can you please give me an update on my draft.

@Lapablo: any update on this?

The subject doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV and also is Too Soon. Lapablo (talk) 11:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Request - Draft:Christopher Hollins

Hello, I am wondering if you would be interested in re-reviewing [Draft: Christopher Hollins]. It is about an American politician who is leading the charge in making sure all Harris County, Texans are able to vote by mail in the upcoming election. Harris County is a major county to watch because it is slated as a County that could determine whether Texas goes red or blue in November 2020 and Mr. Hollins' work will be instrumental in the outcome. He recently appeared on VICE, and is scheduled to appear on MSNBC and CNN in the coming daysBostickLaw (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:26:24, 3 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Ceefrop

Ceefrop (talk · contribs)
- Draft:DFD Music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Here's wikipedia's Notability requirements for music:

- Criteria for musicians and ensembles 2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.

Suitable charts A chart is normally considered suitable for inclusion if it meets both of the following characteristics:

It is published by a recognized reliable source. This includes any IFPI affiliate, Billboard magazine, or any organization with the support of Nielsen SoundScan.

DFD Music has charted on BILLBOARD multiple times. The sources are linked in the article.

They have always worked with major labels and signed artists. Another notability requirement which is linked.

Approve the article.

Ceefrop (talk) 18:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ceefrop: , I can't approve an article because you feel it should be approved. Guidelines are set to maintain standard and clearly the subject does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:SIGCOV. There's a bunch of promotional article and press releases online which I found and are not WP:RS standard. Lapablo (talk) 12:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines we met. With proof. From Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceefrop (talk • contribs) 20:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello Lapablo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lapablo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lapablo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 13:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

– bradv🍁 17:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed paid editing and likely sockpuppetry, of User:Ukpong1. Appeal of this block is only to the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en

wikimedia.org.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yemi Blaq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yemi Blaq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yemi Blaq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dakkada F.C. managers

A tag has been placed on Category:Dakkada F.C. managers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Plateau United F.C. managers

A tag has been placed on Category:Plateau United F.C. managers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Remo Stars F.C. managers

A tag has been placed on Category:Remo Stars F.C. managers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Villages in Abia State

A tag has been placed on Category:Villages in Abia State requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Villages in Imo State

A tag has been placed on Category:Villages in Imo State requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Marshawn Lynch will provide color commentary on 'Karate Combat'". NBC Sports. Retrieved 30 September 2020.

[NBC_Sports_Color_commentary_on_‘Karate_Combat’-1] "Marshawn Lynch will provide color commentary on 'Karate Combat'". NBC Sports. Retrieved 30 September 2020.

[1]