User talk:Lamborghini LP670
|
Articles for deletion nomination of 9,000 miles (song)
[edit]
I have nominated 9,000 miles (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9,000 miles (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CTJF83 chat 20:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 9,000 miles (song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CTJF83 chat 21:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Read mail
[edit]Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Read mail, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Read mail
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]I've noticed some of your recent edits, and I wanted to provide a little helpful advice. Some of your car-related page creations look to be notable interesting subjects. Those kinds of additions are welcome and encouraged.
In those cases other people have been trying to help you as well. If you look at the edit histories on those pages you'll see other editors helping update the page. Some of these updates include tags to help bring others there. It's one of the ways that other people are able to find articles that need to be updated. So when you remove them, it's counter productive.
In the same way, when you create a page, and someone nominates it for deletion, removing the tag that's put on that page doesn't change the discussion about the deletion: if you want to make an argument about that, then follow the link and make the argument, but please don't remove those tags over and over. It is seen as disruptive, and makes people uninclined to help you improve the articles you've created.
Finally, don't create test pages in the mainspace like Read mail. It is for articles, not for personal pages.
I'd encourage you to look at some of the links above. I think if you get a better feeling of how people work together on articles, you'll have a great time. But people don't like it when you continually remove their work or tags, or don't communicate about what you're doing. I hope you find this advice helpful. Shadowjams (talk) 19:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit] Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 98.248.41.128 (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Apostrophe. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. swaq 19:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. 98.248.41.128 (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Hypercar Royalty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A term used in a single episode of a show does not deserve its own article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. swaq 20:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Lamborghini Embolado
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lamborghini Embolado. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamborghini Embolado. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]
This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. 98.248.41.128 (talk) 19:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Benz Viktoria
[edit]Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Benz Viktoria, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ChaosControl1994 (talk) 19:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi. I have declined the speedy deletion nomination on this article, as it is clearly not a hoax; but I hope you plan to expand it. There are images at commons:Category:Benz_Victoria you could use. The Welcome paragraph at the top of this page is a rather overwhelomg one: I recommend WP:Your first article as a good introduction to article writing. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Some more advice, after reading the other warnings above: there are two important Wikipedia policies you should read and understand:
- Verifiability, which includes: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true."
- Notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
- Because we get so many hoax and nonsense articles - new article are created at a rate of more than one a minute - very short articles which do not cite any references and do not show why their subject is notable are very likely to be speedy-deleted. It is best to wait to input a new article until you have assembled enough material to make it clear to the (hard-pressed, volunteer) New Page Patrol that it is likely to become a serious article. I advise you again to read WP:Your first article carefully. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Hypercar Royalty
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hypercar Royalty. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypercar Royalty. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 98.248.41.128 (talk) 09:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Barabus tkr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Having looked through various sources and auto sites, it is clear that this car was never made and does not exist. All it is is a car company announcing that they would make a supercar that produced x horsepower and y top speed. All the available sources are simply discussion of the announcement. Given that nothing has materialised the current one-sentence stub is no longer even true. It can safely be deleted.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zunaid 14:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Khoras
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Khoras requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Chzz ► 14:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Da Monkey Punk
[edit]You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Da Monkey Punk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you can assert the notability of the subject, 
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Da Monkey Punk, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Socialservice (talk) 16:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Deadmau5 Singles
[edit]Category:Deadmau5 Singles, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with HR 8938 Cephei. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
70.24.247.54 (talk) 12:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Voltage (Skrillex album). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Alinblack (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
The article 100% No Modern Talking has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not appear to have been a particularly notable album. Propose merge into Knife Party.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salimfadhley (talk) 22:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Deadmau5 Circa 1998–2002 for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deadmau5 Circa 1998–2002 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadmau5 Circa 1998–2002 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Money Store (album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Kaini (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to No Love Deep Web with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:46, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at No Love Deep Web, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ಥ⁀ಥ listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ಥ⁀ಥ. Since you had some involvement with the ಥ⁀ಥ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Abote2 (talk) 21:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)