User talk:LajosFace

Recent edit to Android Nougat

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Android Nougat article that did not include sources/was unnotable. In the future, please make sure that your edit has sources or is notable. Thank You! RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 23:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Goodbye Volcano High, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 23:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, enough of sweet-talking, let's cut to the chase: simply put, fuck your politically charged censorship! LajosFace (talk) 04:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since Wikipedia is not owned by a private company, I have my full right to exercise free speech on this site via presenting the unboased truth. Yet you keep coming back and censor it back with the version that is charged with a far-left political agenda. Just to be clear, if a far-right person from 4chan started nukibg the article with hate, I would have taken action, too. But no, you just can't take unbiased truth and you just HAVE to keep people in polarised echo chambers.

How far Wikipedia has fallen… LajosFace (talk) 04:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Goodbye Volcano High. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Edit summaries such as that one are not acceptable Meters (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just recently voiced my concerns on the page of one of the editors.

Even though I am very angry, I tried my best to be constructive on their page. But I still have my war as Plan B is there is no consensus, keep in mind. LajosFace (talk) 07:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I just reverted your post there as a personal attack. Meters (talk) 07:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Goodbye Volcano High, you may be blocked from editing. Keep your rants to yourself. If you want to discuss your edits then do so politely and neutrally. Threatening to sock if you are blocked (not "banned") and extend your actions to other topics is not going to help. Oh, and the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. Nothing to do with editing Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 07:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Adakiko. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 07:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think at least we should reach a consensus regarding the wording.

Yeah, sure, there were a couple of people from 4chan who harassed the developers, but Snoot Game in and of itself is not a harassment campaign. LajosFace (talk) 07:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then discuss the material calmly and neutrally on the article's talk page. You are on very thin ice here. No insults, no personal attacks, no threats to sock, no inflammatory edit summaries, no swearing, no ranting about constitutional rights, no threats to expand your disruptive tactics to other articles if you don't get what you want, no calls for others to join your great quest, etc. Meters (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]