User talk:Laisinteresting

Welcome!

Hello, Laisinteresting, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Will (Talk - contribs) 03:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Canal(Mario Party 7 Board) may be deleted

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Grand Canal(Mario Party 7 Board), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Grand Canal(Mario Party 7 Board). You may remove the deletion notice, but note that the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Will (Talk - contribs) 03:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have decided that Grand Canal(Mario Party 7 Board) should be deleted, please say so on the talk page for Grand Canal(Mario Party 7 Board) rather than blanking the page. When you blank the page, we lose the context of the deletion request and that request no longer appears in the correct categories. For those reasons, I have restored the page to what it was before you blanked it. Will (Talk - contribs) 06:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ilsa Shickelgrubermeiger-Von Helsinger Keppelugerhoffer

A tag has been placed on Ilsa Shickelgrubermeiger-Von Helsinger Keppelugerhoffer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CIreland 02:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of people Nina Myers killed

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article List of people Nina Myers killed, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mysdaao 22:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Parlour(Ice Cream)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Parlour(Ice Cream), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Parlour(Ice Cream) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Parlour(Ice Cream), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Parlour(Ice Cream) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to remove the speedy delete tag from the article because you are the creator. Hu 00:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Year Round School

Please note that Wikipedia is not a forum for opinion. Articles are not meant to be persuasive essays; I have removed your "conclusions" from the Year-round school article. The content of the article has been thoroughly discussed on the Talk Page. The consensus is that the article must remain neutral and factual. If you have some additional debate, please place it on the Talk Page. Your contributions should be cited, sourced, and neutral, (facts, not opinions). Let me know if you have any questions! Nimur 00:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TemplateAppearances3

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article TemplateAppearances3, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. east.718 at 00:54, 10/27/2007 00:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Base colour

A tag has been placed on Base colour, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JONATHAN ^{Go green!} 02:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Secret World of Santa Claus

I have nominated The Secret World of Santa Claus, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret World of Santa Claus. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ixfd64 (talk) 03:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macaroni and cheese (color)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Macaroni and cheese (color), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of very long numbers

A tag has been placed on List of very long numbers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Atyndall93 | talk 13:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Biggest Price Cut

A tag has been placed on The Biggest Price Cut, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Comparing Temprature of Planets in Solar System

I have nominated Comparing Temprature of Planets in Solar System, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparing Temprature of Planets in Solar System. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Regards, CycloneNimrod^Talk? 20:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Colours article

I see you're trying to create a list of colours article, but please note that List of colors already exists. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't check (guess I should've). Just rederict it. ThanksLaisinteresting (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

The Prince (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma City Thunder

FYI, consensus is that the history of the Seattle Supersonics is part of the history of the Oklahoma City Thunder. As a result, all statistics, championships, etc. should be included in the Thunder's article. If you have concerns about this, please discuss them on the talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Appearances22

Template:Appearances22 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 15:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Comparing Yugoslavian republics and states

I have nominated Comparing Yugoslavian republics and states, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparing Yugoslavian republics and states. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ◅PRODUCER _(TALK) 12:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of chocolate bars in Canada

I have nominated List of chocolate bars in Canada, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chocolate bars in Canada. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Claritas § 16:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Laisinteresting/Sandbox

User:Laisinteresting/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Laisinteresting/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Laisinteresting/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nestle Fav*rites (chocolate mix)

The article Nestle Fav*rites (chocolate mix) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced ad stub since 2007

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dicklyon (talk) 16:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Radio (game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radio (game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio (game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete list of colors and shades listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Incomplete list of colors and shades. Since you had some involvement with the Incomplete list of colors and shades redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St. Bridgid's Camp

The article St. Bridgid's Camp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 13:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thinsations

The article Thinsations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Product that does not have independent notability. Currently, the article is merely a catalog of products, and the only sources are primary. Searching for additional sources turns up mentions of the product, but no actual coverage or discussion that would allow for the development of an article that could pass the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]