User talk:Lachlan Lachlan

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dark Night of the Soul (album) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dark Night of the Soul (album) was changed by FamblyCat94 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2016-04-26T03:10:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music Has the Right to Children, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Certain Ratio

Nice one! - David Gerard (talk) 21:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! FamblyCat94 (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Heckle and Mr Jive

A tag has been placed on Dr Heckle and Mr Jive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This same page also exists on Dr. Heckle and Mr. Jive

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 3primetime3 (talk) 03:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Swimming (The Names album)

added links pointing to The Names and Fact (magazine)

Fakebook (album)

added a link pointing to Hoboken

Polyrock (album)

added a link pointing to Fact (magazine)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AE_LIVE

Autechre are a notable band and therefore articles regarding their releases, particularly those with a decent amount of references, are to be maintained. I am removing the notability template on AE_LIVE particularly as you are not an administrator. Drneroli (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is completely incorrect - there are many notable bands for whom not every individual release is article-worthy. And being an admin or not is not relevant - David Gerard (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Modern Romans cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Modern Romans cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shades in Bed.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shades in Bed.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Where Are All the Nice Girls?.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Where Are All the Nice Girls?.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Commercial Suicide (album)

Hello, FamblyCat94,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Commercial Suicide (album) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commercial Suicide (album) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Chris Troutman (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Commercial Suicide (album)

added a link pointing to Fact (magazine)

In Gut's House

added a link pointing to Evol

The Sun and the Moon (The Sun and the Moon album)

added a link pointing to Mark Burgess

Welcome Plastics

added a link pointing to Fact (magazine)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Where Are All the Nice Girls?.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Where Are All the Nice Girls?.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skull Worship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Bloody Valentine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Modern Romans cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Modern Romans cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Tin Drum (album). Binksternet (talk) 06:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hotel Room, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twilight Zone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting genres from multiple articles?

Why are you removing genres from multiple articles? For example you removed the genres from Wild Mood Swings apparently without regard to this source. Please stop making these mass changes; please consults sources before removing any genres; and please use edit summaries.- Mr X 16:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With current standards, genres need to be sourced individually in all articles on music releases, and that was not done on this article or any of the other articles I removed genres from. For Wild Mood Swings, none of the genres that were listed are mentioned in the AllMusic article's prose, and according to WP:ALBUM/SOURCE, AllMusic sidebar genres are not allowed to be used as sources. FamblyCat94 (talk) 23:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A user who has been here for less than two months should not be making sweeping removals of content that is obviously verifiable. A reasonable thing to do would be to search for better sources, and then replace any incorrect genres with the correct ones. Removing genres that are in many cases accurate is not improving the encyclopedia. Please don't continue to make these mass changes.- Mr X 01:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have been a valuable contributor to Wikipedia for years in different forms and have worked on thousands of articles, but I will avoid removing genres without first searching that they can be verified (even if unsourced infobox genres are regularly examples of "original research" and, for acts like The Cure for example, who have been known to not stick to the same particular style or genre throughout their career, it is not safe to assume that particular genres—other than the umbrella "rock"—common to some of their work will apply to their entire catalogue). FamblyCat94 (talk) 06:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I have been a valuable contributor to Wikipedia for years in different forms" - Please could you disclose which other accounts you have edited under? Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the sources, before you make an edit like Special:Diff/842417096. Should we expand the |genre= field to "Post-punk power pop"? Because that is what Dave Thompson writes.

Had I written to you yesterday, I would like Lugnuts had liked to know which accounts you used to edit under. The renaming of "FamblyCat94" to "Lachlan Lachlan" a few hours ago confirms what we suspected. Are you aware of the WP:CLEANSTART expectations? Sam Sailor 16:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seligpreisung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altenmarkt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth World, Vol. 1

"Update" didn't quite explain anything from you either. Sections titled "Content" never direct to the section when clicking them from the table of contents, so that was not an improvement. Semicolons shouldn't be used to make pseudo headings (WP:BADHEAD), as you did. And once again, you're stubbornly piping "Pitchfork Media" as "Pitchfork". Also, your revision to the lead made the second sentence slightly clumsy; "...by record label Editions EG..." Dan56 (talk) 21:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bundling AfDs

Hi FamblyCat94. I noticed that you nominated a large number of related articles for deletion a few days ago, but you did them all separately and created an AfD page for every single one of them. This probably took a fair amount of your time and I just wanted to let you know that it's not necessary. I don't know if you know this, but there is a way to group them all together when nominating them for deletion. The instructions for doing so are outlined at WP:MULTIAFD, and I recommend giving it a read if you haven't already. It would be beneficial to do it this way since the community can discuss the articles as a group, which is much more efficient and less confusing than discussing individually.

Cheers, Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 14:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shades in Bed.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shades in Bed.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Jam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Air (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack the Tab/Tekno Acid Beat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fact (magazine). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Strung Out in Heaven page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Another Music in a Different Kitchen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Bites. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, FamblyCat94. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chinese Restaurant cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chinese Restaurant cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rue de Siam (album) cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rue de Siam (album) cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Make a Record cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Make a Record cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:I Second That Emotion (Japan version) cover.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:I Second That Emotion (Japan version) cover.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Blue Jam CD cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Blue Jam CD cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FamblyCat94. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Deletion, Feb. 15

Hello, today you nominated dozens of articles for deletion and said the exact same thing in all of them: "Does not appear to satisfy WP:NALBUM." All of these nominations create a lot of work for admins and your fellow editors. See WP:BEFORE and WP:DISCUSSAFD, because as the nominator you have certain responsibilities to describe why the article deserves to be deleted and why the WP guidelines have not been satisfied. See also WP:NEXIST, because an article's lack of sources is not proof that those sources do not exist, and it's entirely possible that they do exist and the article really needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 22:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can second these sentiments too - please don't nominate so many similar articles all at once - it really bogs the whole process down. In addition to what is said above, also please note that if you have done research, and cannot find any sources or signs of notability, you are free to be bold and simply WP:REDIRECT the article yourself. In most cases, when you're dealing with things like band's albums, redirecting is preferred over deletion anyways, as it helps people who decide to search for the album titles, and redirecting is preferred in general if its a plausible search term. If someone disagrees with your redirect, then start up an AFD if you're still intent on getting rid of the article. Sergecross73 msg me 19:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I concur with doomsdayer520 and Sergecross73: sending 37 articles to AFD on the same day and having 30 discussions closed as "Redirect" serves as a reminder to read and apply WP:ATD-R.

You returned on May 10th from a three-month hiatus and immediately send Amethyst Deceivers and Live Three to AFD. Same thing here: redirect them first, see WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT.

With the username change yesterday from FamblyCat94 to Lachlan Lachlan and your statement in June 2016 that you had been a valuable contributor to Wikipedia for years in different forms, there is, I presume, no doubt about my analysis from February: you are Lachlan Foley (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) returning.

The addition of {{notability|Music}} in Special:Diff/736246778, Special:Diff/733788402, Special:Diff/733787553, Special:Diff/733787114, Special:Diff/733787055, Special:Diff/733043501, and Special:Diff/733787161, as well as likely several dozenz if not hundreds of other cases - a rapid-fire series like this: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10] (that is 10 notability tags within 5 minutes) avoids immediate scrutiny as no edit summary was used - with the FamblyCat94 account can hardly be seen as not violating WP:CLEANSTART and the editing restriction placed by the community. Sam Sailor 14:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lachlan, these are some serious, credible accusations here. I need hear your response to this. Do not ignore this as you have with many other concerns about your editing, past and present. Sergecross73 msg me 14:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With two nominations today, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/President (song) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spit It Out (IAMX song) nothing has really changed, Lachlan. Would you please heed the advice given by Sergecross73 and respond in this thread? Sam Sailor 12:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Until you provide a counter explanation, your account is blocked, as an editor has been giving a compelling, credible argument that you have created additionoal accounts in order to get around your editing restrictions, which is not acceptable. Sergecross73 msg me 12:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lachlan Lachlan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why on Earth have I been blocked? What have I done other than improved countless Wikipedia articles out of a genuine desire to contribute? What do you mean I have tried to "get around my editing restrictions"? What restrictions? Some straightforward common sense here would be nice. FamblyCat94 (talk) 12:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The section above answers your question. If you were on editing restrictions from a previous account (see [11], [12], [13]), you don't get to ignore those by moving to a new account. I doubt anyone will unblock you unless you address all of the concerns described above. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:56, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fuck you, then, and fuck Wikipedia. Never editing an article again. Those edits were made 3 years ago, and I didn't even realize creating another account was an issue. All I have contributed means nothing to people like you to whom I am just another mere username. Lachlan Lachlan (talk) 16:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lachlan Lachlan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I just want to piss you off because you are all boring nerd idiots who have ruined my day. I hope I get banned from using the site altogether. Thanks! Lachlan Lachlan (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talkpage access revoked SQL ^{Query me!} 16:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-free rationale for File:Nah=Poo – The Art of Bluff.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nah=Poo – The Art of Bluff.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackbird (Dandy Warhols cover) single cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blackbird (Dandy Warhols cover) single cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hex (Poison Girls album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hex (Poison Girls album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hex (Poison Girls album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]