User talk:LaLeLiLou
Welcome!
[edit]Hi LaLeLiLou! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Sock-puppetry
[edit]
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar. Thank you. Psychologist Guy (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Strange (and ironic) that your edit summary says "Welcome". When I create a new section, that new section title appears in the edit summary. LaLeLiLou (talk) 23:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- There are about 55 million articles on Wikipedia. Seriously, if you are that obsessed to edit this website over and over on new accounts you would probably have a better chance at avoiding detection if you edited articles unrelated to the Bates method which are being watched by many admins and experienced users. But I am watching 1000s of articles so sooner or later I would probably find your account again. These specific articles related to Bates method that you keep editing are heavily watched, you are not fooling anyone and your editing interests and habits are easy to identify. At the end of the day you are just wasting your own time. Your edits will be reverted and you will be blocked. My advice is to just give up and do something else more productive. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- You're wrong. The Stephen Jones thing is a weird coincidence, but he is not exactly obscure, and I edited other articles unrelated to him or to eyesight. LaLeLiLou (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- There are about 55 million articles on Wikipedia. Seriously, if you are that obsessed to edit this website over and over on new accounts you would probably have a better chance at avoiding detection if you edited articles unrelated to the Bates method which are being watched by many admins and experienced users. But I am watching 1000s of articles so sooner or later I would probably find your account again. These specific articles related to Bates method that you keep editing are heavily watched, you are not fooling anyone and your editing interests and habits are easy to identify. At the end of the day you are just wasting your own time. Your edits will be reverted and you will be blocked. My advice is to just give up and do something else more productive. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)