User talk:Kysterskartel
Kysterskartel, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Kysterskartel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Danish political parties
[edit]Please don't change the classification of the ideologies of Danish political parties without providing reliable sources.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 17:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Template:WW2InfoBox
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I've just reverted your changes to this infobox as you didn't explain your reasoning for making them, and they ran counter to the outcomes of previous discussions at Template talk:WW2InfoBox, where the view has previously been to keep the number of national leaders and countries listed to a minimum. If you'd like to propose adding more countries, please start a new discussion of this at Template talk:WW2InfoBox. Please also feel free to drop me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or I can be of assistance. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 21:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Template:WW2InfoBox. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Kysterskartel. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ihler, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 14:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
The Teahouse Turns One!
[edit]It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!
Teahouse First Birthday Badge | |
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. |
- --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:WW2InfoBox. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 02:57, 16 June 2013 (UTC)