User talk:Kylie Eileen

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kylie Eileen (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Earwig was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kylie Eileen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Earwig ^talk 06:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kylie Eileen (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Non-dropframe was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kylie Eileen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Non-Dropframe _talk 10:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kylie Eileen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Non-Dropframe _talk 10:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kylie Eileen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kylie Eileen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hilton High School— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:IronGargoyle with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page maliciously, as you did at User talk:IronGargoyle. Favonian (talk) 20:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Spencerport High School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Changing my Edits

Just stop

Your draft article, Draft:Kylie Eileen

Hello, Kylie Eileen. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kylie Eileen".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Spencerport, New York has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Spencerport, New York was changed by Kylie Eileen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913985 on 2016-03-21T22:58:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Spencerport, New York

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Spencerport, New York added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]