User talk:KyZan

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

Good luck, and have fun. --Sefringle 05:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonism

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Reasonism, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.liberalinstitute.com/Reasonism.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Reasonism

A tag has been placed on Reasonism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironho lds 21:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the deletion template from the article once I read that you wrote it; it's very nicely written! Feel free to contact me in the future if you have any questions/problems regarding wiki-editing; talkpage edits go at the bottom, btw, not the top :). Ironho lds 21:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ironholds -- Thanks for removing the "speedy delete" template! Also thanks for saying it's nicely written! I know this proposed article still has a sort of quasi-"opinion" flavor and not enough "encyclopedia" flavor -- but THAT'S why I submitted it to Wikipedia! I know it needs to be expanded and improved. Maybe in a week or two (if not deleted) it will have much greater neutrality and authoritative sourcing! :-) KyZan (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)KyZan[reply]

Ironholds -- I posted the online permission regarding 'Reasonism' 10 minutes ago at http://liberalinstitute.com at the bottom of the page in red. KyZan (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)KyZan[reply]

As reviewing administrator, I think the article isnone the less eligibile for deletion as original resarch:

Proposed deletion of Reasonism

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Reasonism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG (talk) 23:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May I make a suggestion, KyZan? Move it to your userpage or summat, that way you can work on getting it to a more neutral POV and adding in some sources without the risk of it being deleted :). The three topics i've studied in most detail are philosophy, history and politics, so i'm sure I can help out :). Ironho lds 00:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Reasonism

I have nominated Reasonism, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reasonism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conservative Liberalism

Dear KyZa, about your recent comments on conservative liberalism, where you called an editor "an insect who isn't worth talking to" and "a Wikipedia vandal who isn't worth my time". I would advise you to look at Wikipedia:No personal attacks about the kind of manners that are appreciated on wikipedia. The simple principle on wikipedia is: discuss edits and not editors. C mon (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C Mon: Tell him that. He broke the rules first and worst. And without justice. And bear in mind that I ultimately let him win -- even tho' he's wrong. This little dictator seems to have a lot more free time than me -- which he uses to deface articles, like the aforementioned. As for manners, before I said anything he repeatedly accused me of "spamming." Where's the assumption of good will? He also said "From the article you linked it doesn't seem that you know many things but not especially on conservative liberalism." I probably have more knowledge in my little finger than he has in his whole body. I feel sick if I don't. And I may well understand the fundamentals of THIS ISSUE -- conservatism, liberalism, and the nexus and relationship thereof -- better than anyone else on earth. So I didn't entirely appreciate his false, gratuitous, vicious, and personal remarks. But here's something for everyone: The world of Wikipedia may well be too petty and small-minded for me to deal with. KyZan (talk) 16:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)KyZan[reply]

If you feel so far superior, which you (or may not) have good reason to do, please show so in your behaviour. If you feel you stand above don't demean him. Take the higher road. Keep your dignity do not enter in petty name calling. If I understand your own words you should be beyond that. C mon (talk) 18:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do feel far superior, folks. Imagine that. And no, I really don't have time for insects. I just didn't realize how common they were here. 24.44.129.156 (talk) 06:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)KyZan[reply]

Proposed deletion of Troika magazine

The article Troika magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not clear how this is notable. Lacks 3rd party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Yeon-mi Park for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 11:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Substandard English

A tag has been placed on Template:Substandard English requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 14:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Substandard English

Template:Substandard English has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brec Bassinger, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1][2] Though you apparently mean well, the strength of the article is wholly based on the inline references provided. Leaving a snippet of a reference in your edit summary doesn't directly strengthen the article, as no reader would ever go to the edit history to figure out why a statement was added. Instead, please use the easy-peasy built-in citation tool to cite your news source. Details can be found at Referencing for Beginners, specifically the video captioned "This screencast (5 mins. 3 secs.) walks through the citation wizard of RefToolbar 2.0b." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it took me about 5 minutes to look for the article, verify the info and add the reference. It would have taken you less time and effort to do the same as you already had the info and links. It serves little purpose to create work for other editors for stuff you could easily do yourself. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to Geraldo's note, please read WP:BURDEN. The onus is on you to provide an inline citation when content you add has been challenged, not to shuttle that responsibility onto other users' backs. I attempted to politely give you the means to help yourself so that you wouldn't have to be in this position again, but that didn't sit well with you. If you refuse to add sources, you will find the bulk of your edits reverted by other members of the community. If you're not willing to learn how to add references, the door is that-a-way. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User page and redlinks

Your user page, User:KyZan, is to show off what you have done here at Wikipedia, and to communicate with other Wikipedians. A red link is a hyperlink that goes nowhere, like this red link. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vladimir Volegov

The article Vladimir Volegov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 17:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KyZan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cucurbita. --Mr Fink (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or, indeed, the next time you post personal attacks like the ones in the rant I've just removed from further up this page. Black Kite (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)+[reply]

Your userpage

Yes, it is your userpage, but it's subject to rules on what you may and may not include. You don't get to insult other editors at random here, or you simply get blocked. So please don't put that stuff back again, because that will inevitably be the result. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious. So evil. Time to censor again. 19:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)KyZan

Proposed deletion of North Korea-America Conflict

The article North Korea-America Conflict has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited and Wikipedia is not news.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 00:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KyZan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, KyZan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Social Justice. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. You seem to have been here for a while. You should know better, no? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:RandomCanadian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Religious objectivity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Religious objectivity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 03:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That article is important and true. If Wikipedia chooses to delete it, it's stupidly and depravedly harming itself. As usual. KyZan (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)KyZan[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Religious objectivity

Hello KyZan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Religious objectivity for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Milkshaking. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It needs a source, that's all. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Davis Riley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Davis Riley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davis Riley (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Davis Riley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Davis Riley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 20:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KyZan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 20:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Davis Riley

Hello, KyZan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Davis Riley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Davis Riley

Hello, KyZan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Davis Riley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Falun Gong. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you apparently claim edit(s) to your user page were deleted?

You write there that " It's not that my contributions are reverted. It's that in the past year or two most discussions of why are deleted. This even applies to my "user page." But that didn't happen. And if you really think Wikipedia is evil, should you be editing? Doug Weller talk 09:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of my "user page" was deleted and censored many years ago. Massive "talk" sections of many articles too. Why do you say otherwise? Who are you, why do you care, and why are you looking at my page? KyZan (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You could have found out by looking at my user and talk pages, but I'm one of the few Administrators who can check not just for revision deleted edits but also for suppressed edits. You're user page wasn't touched by anyone else but you. You are on my watchlist because of the post above this thread. I don't know what "discussions of why" means. Doug Weller talk 10:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some talk page edits of yours were deleted only because the article itself was deleted. Doug Weller talk 10:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My user page was radically censored -- likely by someone like you. Jimmy Wales and I discussed Wikipedia before it began, and I wrote for it before 99.99% of you censors heard of it. I'm perfectly aware truth and goodness are hated by almost all current Wikipedia editors. Wales knows it too. KyZan (talk) 16:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No one has edited your user page since it was first created, no deletions or suppressions. It hasn't happened, please stop claiming it has.

I'd suggest telling Jimbo about your feelings on his talk but as that would be a bad idea it's better if you don't. Doug Weller talk 16:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe you should, as I don't believe you. Doug Weller talk 13:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was censored to an extreme extent. Are you saying such things don't happen? KyZan (talk) 10:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KyZan I'm telling you I'd know if it had been rev/deleted or suppressed. The only person changing it is you, and you are clearly not here to build this encyclopedia. Doug Weller talk 11:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 11:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]