User talk:KuchenZimjah

KuchenZimjah, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi KuchenZimjah! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

Congratulations! You have earned the

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page.
Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bhutan-Slovenia relations

Hi, I'm Matty.007. KuchenZimjah, thanks for creating Bhutan-Slovenia relations!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs a little expansion, then looks great

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mat ty.007 09:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dzongkha Wikipedia

Hi! Welcome to Dzongkha Wikipedia. --Impro (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Suicide in Bhutan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Nepalese and Himalayan

Bhutanese passport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bhutanese

Dzok Trun Trun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tibetan

Ngathrek Golop Lhakpa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Imperial Court

Students Union of Bhutan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nepali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maximums Edgar Snobbery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maximums Edgar Snobbery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dolescum (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhutan-India Border for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhutan-India Border is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutan-India Border until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Maximums Edgar Snobbery (September 1)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximums Edgar Snobbery.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Libby norman (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bhutanese Passport-1.ogg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhutanese Passport-1.ogg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Bhutanese Passport-1.ogg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximums Edgar Snobbery concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximums Edgar Snobbery, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suicide in Cameroon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximums Edgar Snobbery concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximums Edgar Snobbery, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited JG Strijdom Shrubland & Field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximums Edgar Snobbery

Hello KuchenZimjah. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Maximums Edgar Snobbery".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maximums Edgar Snobbery}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tselopka-Tselung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thresh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhutanese Passport-1.ogg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bhutanese Passport-1.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 14:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutanese Passport audiofile

Hi KuchenZimjah, there has been a lot of discussion surrounding your reading of Bhutanese passport. Above this message is a notice that your audio-file has been nominated for deletion however the deletion of your file raises several questions for other wikipedians. For one thing, you may very well be the only native Bhutanese person editing on English wikipedia. This means that almost no one has heard Bhutan-accented-English until coming across your audio file.

Many of us would hate to loose such a contribution, and I was wondering if you would be interested in creating a new audio recording for the article. It seems that the main reasons people want to delete the current file is because of the electronic distortion in your voice, the way you trail off after certain words, and the way your speed changes back and forth several times. If you were able to address these concerns I would be willing to bet that there would be no objections raised. Cheers! Ryan shell (talk) 13:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am here to thank you for your wonderfully funny audio version of the Bhutanese passport page. From your neighboring country. Nepal. Gamesnepal20:43, Thursday, November 21, 2024 (UTC)

Don't listen to those guys. Your recording rules. Make more of them! 199.180.246.146 (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recording has even been remixed, something most likely no other spoken article will ever reach: Bhutanese Passport Music Video (YouTube) - link blocked by Wikipedia. --LordOider (talk) 23:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing your recording of the Bhutanese passport page. I hope to hear more of your recordings in the future! Pusle8 (talk) 09:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are a hero among mortals. Hearing your audio file made me realize that there is so much beauty in the world and that we should be thankful for everything we recieve. Thank you sir, for everything. ☞ Rim ^{< Talk | Edits >} 01:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhutanese passport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhutanese passport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutanese passport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 22:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dzok Trun Trun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dzok Trun Trun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dzok Trun Trun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Keφr 13:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chak Seelong

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chak Seelong, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bosstopher (talk) 23:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chak Seelong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chak Seelong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chak Seelong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bosstopher (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of JG Strijdom Shrubland & Field

The article JG Strijdom Shrubland & Field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability only sources directly related to the topic are google maps, possibly a hoax .

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bosstopher (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tselopka-Tselung

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tselopka-Tselung, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bosstopher (talk) 21:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ngathrek Golop Lhakpa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ngathrek Golop Lhakpa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ngathrek Golop Lhakpa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 15:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Because of your creation of numerous hoaxes, I have blocked your account indefinitely: we won't tolerate intentional falsehoods, as they're considered to be vandalism. You still have talk page access, so you can request an unblock if you wish (see the link in the block message above this paragraph), but unless I've made a mistake (i.e. you can demonstrate that you're not a hoaxer), I don't think we should unblock. Nyttend (talk) 22:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutanese Passport

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KuchenZimjah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been banned for creating a voice article, using my own voice. I have then been attacked for being racist my using my own voice. I have been represented as a vandal, but I am just being myself. Now please, unblock me. KuchenZimjah (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is not why you were blocked. Based upon your unblock reason, I strongly suggest you read WP:SOAPBOX. Mkdw ^talk 15:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KuchenZimjah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is absolutely incredible. I donated many great articles to Wikipedia, and the fact that a minority of readers deemed by own voice to be inappropriate is ridiculous. I have been blocked for donating articles about food from my own culture, and for using a voice that is my own. Whom can I speak to , so I may complain? It is not my fault that my reading my Bhutanese Passport made it into popular culture,a dn if it had not, I would not have been blocked. --KuchenZimjah (talk) 16:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Perhaps you should take the time to actually read the rules of Wikipedia. Specifically our rules that we do not accept original research. Wikipedia relies on reliable published information to support information added. Your personal knowledge and "voice" does not qualify or meet our standards. Further, a number of editors investigated the information you were adding and determined it likely to be a hoax. You're close to WP:IDHT and failure to acknowledge our governing policies, abide by them, and outline a plan going forward in how you will adhere to them will result in your talk page privileges being revoked. Mkdw ^talk 18:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutanese passport

Although you been blocked because of your hoaxes, you managed to actually turned your audio file about the Bhutanese passport into a popular meme. Props to you. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 03:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Högalidsspången for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Högalidsspången is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Högalidsspången until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]