User talk:Ktemu

This is Ktemu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuck Tingle Bibliography (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do we really need this?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ktemu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuck Tingle Bibliography (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NLIST - is solely reliant on primary sources. It is bordering on WP:SELFPROMOTION.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Hi Ktemu

When you are commenting on article talk pages, like at Talk:Chuck Tingle, it is really helpful if you add your comments to the bottom of the discussion, rather than at the top like you did here – which makes it really hard for other editors to find your comments.

In this particular case, you should probably start a new section entirely, after the boxed rfc, so editors can see at a glance that the discussion has been brought back up after the rfc was resolved. To do so, use the "+New topic" button at the top of the talk page.

Thanks :)

Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 21:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please sign your comment using four tildes (~) like so: ~~~~. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 21:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hi Ktemu! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Chuck Tingle several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Chuck Tingle, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers 02:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How to Wikipedia Comment

Wikipedia has a few fundamental rules about content, such as Neutral Point Of View, Verifiability, and Notability. But equally important are the rules about conduct – how we work on this project – and I encourage you to become familiar with them if you want to contribute. Assume Good Faith, No Personal Attacks, Consensus, and the No Edit-Warring, for example. Accusing me of a vendetta against queer people is both personally offensive and ridiculously off-base. I love Chuck. I think he's great! But Wikipedia is not here to provide a log of everything he's uploaded to Amazon. Bottom line: If you don't learn a little about the rules, you aren't going to be successful as a contributor. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]