User talk:Ksnikita

This is Ksnikita's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cassiopeia^(talk) 12:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ksnikita! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cassiopeia^(talk) 12:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Konstantina Nikita has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Konstantina Nikita. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantina Nikita (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject meets the notability criteria for academics (WP:NPROF, #3) and thus qualifies for an article on Wikipedia. However, the article is written in a non-neutral style, with a number of unverifiable claims. Please include in-line citations for all claims made in the article. If this is an autobiography or a biography of someone you know, please declare it on the talk page and your user page (see WP:DISCLOSE).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantina Nikita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Konstantina Nikita, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 23:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MapleSoy: Hello, thank you very much for the constructive comments! This article is not an autobiography. I am a postgraduate student at the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NTUA, and I happen to know Professor Nikita's research work and academic contribution in the fields of antennas, biolectromagnetics, and biomedical informatics. When searching information regarding her research, I noticed that there was no wikipedia article providing information on her research achievements. That is why I decided to start writing this article. I have made several modifications and added in-line citations as proposed. Thanks again for all your efforts and comments for improving the article! Ksnikita (talk) 17:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ksnikita. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 10:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Randykitty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NJournals. Too young to have become notable yet. Give it a few years to see whether it survives.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Randykitty (talk) 16:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantina Nikita has been accepted

Konstantina Nikita, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 20:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ksnikita. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Konstantina Nikita, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation (January 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Randykitty was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: None of the sources provided is independent of the journal (some don't even mention it). Hence this obviously fails WP:GNG. As remarked in a previous round, this also fails WP:NJournals. Article creation is clearly premature.

Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Randykitty: Hello, thank you very much for the constructive comments! The journal was recently indexed by the Directory of Open Access Journals, which is an independent database that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals. This information has been included in the article. Although the journal was launched one year ago by the IEEE, it has developed significantly in terms of content and impact (more than 80 published articles, more than 45,000 article views and downloads). Could you please provide any advice on improving this article? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksnikita (talk • contribs)

DOAJ is not a particularly selective database: they accept all legitimate OA journals (i.e., they only exclude fake "predatory" journals), so that doesn't count towards notability. At this point, this journal does not meet either WP:NJournals or WP:GNG (very few journals meet the latter), so article creation is not possible. The journal is still very young, so at this point we don't even know whether it's going to survive. My advice is to wait a few years until the journal is included in Scopus or the Science Citation Index Expanded and notability (and survival) is clearly established. --Randykitty (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]