User talk:Krystalgreat

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits to Tems (singer) that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to create your first article
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! User:Verbcatcher (talk) 11:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 23:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing Warning

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy paste back to mainspace. It is disruptive. Celestina007 (talk) 00:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore I have removed your copy-paste which contained several unreliable sources and ref bombing from mainspace. Celestina007 (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soft (singer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Soft (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 01:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you explain if or not you have a COI

I have moved to draft two of your latest articles, because I believe there may an existing undisclosed COI editing, a couple of things, first is, why are you ref bombing with unreliable sources? second is, why are you move warring? That is, why are you copy pasting back to mainspace? For example, in the first article that was moved to draft, the ref bombing was removed and trimmed to size, pending this conversation, but rather than wait you copy pasted the original material which was riddled with unreliable sources back to mainspace. Please (if it exists) can you explain in what capacity you are related to the subjects of your article? Please can you be so kind as to enlighten me as to what really is going on here? You may be glad to know that Wikipedia has no deadline, thus there isn’t a reason to rush, so please can you consider using the AFC method to create your articles going forward? For now I’d really appreciate the answers to the aforementioned questions. Thank you for your time. Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Celestina007, thank you for asking, i do not know any of them, i randomly edit and create articles i felt it’s notable, i’m an OAP in a reputable organization, i joined with passion to edit and create notable articles, if there’s any COI, i will just responsibly have to make it known on my talkpage, i have created other page like Ibijoke Sanwo-Olu, let me detail the reason i created Draft:Soft (singer) was during a conversation or perhaps a music banter about him going round on radio and online that his career was affected because he featured Wizkid during his peak, so i was going through search and saw some google keyword questions about him with artists rating and decided to create his biography on wikipedia, the recent one i created was because i’m working on creating a sub genre known as “Nigeria Street hop” so i hooked up with Fela Kuti stories and history, so on checking out on the children i figured i could create her biography, However, if there is anything i learnt from your contributions is about Refbombing, learnt a lot about it now, but i don’t know about “move warring and copy pasting back to mainspace” "for example, in the first article that was moved to draft, the ref bombing was removed and trimmed to size, pending this conversation, but rather than wait you copy pasted the original material which was riddled with unreliable sources back to mainspace".i want to be enlightened on that, because you said i copy pasted, i cant remember doing that, or rather never was my intentions, thank you, also i will love you remove the COI message on the page because i do not know any of the subjects Krystalgreat (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy pasted means I moved the article to draft and you used the source material to copy paste it back to mainspace, thus making it a new article. Move warring, may not have been the appropriate phrase, because you didn’t technically move-war, but found a way to circumvent the article being incubated and brought it back to mainspace. Celestina007 (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be calm, there is no deadline so we basically have all the time to clarify certain things, Dan ardnt also seemed to have flagged your articles almost at the same time I drafitified your two recent articles creations, I believe they may want to weigh in on this, furthermore, I have a question to ask, don’t be offended, but please do clarify this for me, are you using more than one account simultaneously with this one? Celestina007 (talk) 20:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, i don't use any other account, but then i think its against wikipedia policy, so why such question? Celestina007 also, i'm very calm, never rushed on any project, Verbcatcher helped me to clean up the articles, especially Ibijoke Sanwo-Olu even before i know what refbomb is all about, all thanks to you Krystalgreat (talk) 21:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right it is against policy, I ask for 3 reasons, the first is because new editors who do not know this make this innocent mistake & you appear to be a new editor, (1 month old with 31 edits) that arguably makes you a relatively new editor. Secondly, I ask to ensure you aren’t making that mistake and that you expressly state so for record purposes which thankfully you just did. Lastly I ask because whilst being only 1 month old you seem to be very familiar with our markup which is usually indicative of an editor with more than one account, so if the aforementioned three aren’t the case here, then my apologies, it is a question and nothing more than a question, thankfully you have expressly stated that, this isn’t the case here. Furthermore no, it isn’t necessarily against policy to use more than one account insofar as you follow what is outlined in WP:LEGITSOCK. I say remain calm because we are still in the middle of a conversation. I also say remain calm because of the actions of yesterday where your article was sent to draft and in what seemed like a “hurried move” you copy pasted the source material back to mainspace, thus why I say please kindly remain calm. Celestina007 (talk) 21:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 (talk) Also, had issues when i started editing, when i clicked on the name, it launches me directly to mainspasce, instead of usual article for creation draftspace, i was worried, considered asking it on Teahouse but was discouraged, initially i wanted to always use the draftspace for experience supervision and standard process. Krystalgreat (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Kentalky (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's WP:TOOSOON for this subject. The sourcing does not demonstrate that the general notability guideline or the subject-specific guideline for musicians is met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Kentalky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DJ Kentalky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 18:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krystalgreat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Princess of Ara 18:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Em-mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User:Em-mustapha ^talk 21:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MC Chido for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MC Chido is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Chido until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 14:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krystalgreat. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Portable (singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Portable (singer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Soft (singer)

Hello, Krystalgreat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soft (singer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Soft (singer)

Hello, Krystalgreat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Soft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti

Hello, Krystalgreat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti

Hello, Krystalgreat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Omosalewa Anikulapo Kuti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:52, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]