User talk:Krypton369
| This is Krypton369's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Economic Model, The future of economics (July 23)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quantum Economic Model, The future of economics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Krypton369!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
|
- This article was a product of my pure human ingenuity. I'm the original formulator of quantum economic model. You can find my research in research gate, where the original pdf was published. I badly need to get this published. is it possible for your to re-edit my article, so it will sound more formal and wikipedia friendly. I'm not very rich these days, you can charge a small fee if you like, share you whatsapp if possible to so we can properly communicate. thanks @SafariScribe Krypton369 (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Draft rejection
[edit]Hi, Krypton 369, I've rejected your draft (which does not allow for resubmission), and wanted to drop in here to give you an explanation on why. I see you've already asked about this on the Teahouse (indeed, that's how I found the draft to begin with), and much of this will probably be a repeat of what the other editors there told you. So:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a tertiary source. One of our most fundamental content policies, indeed one of the five "pillars" of Wikipedia, is the concept of verifiability. This means that everything in a Wikipedia article must be able to be verified by a reference to a reliable source. To be more explicit: Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. In a nutshell, Wikipedia isn't interested in what the subject of an article says; it is interested in what other (reliable) sources say about the subject.
A corollary to this is the concept of notability, which on Wikipedia refers to our rules on what should and should not have a Wikipedia article. "Notability" on Wikipedia is a term of art, but the general concept is expressed in the general notability guideline: A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
The reason for this, when bearing our principles of verifiability in mind, is obvious: if a subject hasn't been covered in reliable sources, we have nothing verifiable that we can include in an article about it, and so we can't have an article.
So what this all means for your subject is that it is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. It's pretty clear that you are looking to "get the word out" about your theory, but Wikipedia is not a place to get the word out about any subject; indeed, the ideal situation is that Wikipedia would be the last place that any particular subject gets an article written about it. We can only write about it on Wikipedia after it has been published in other (reliable) places. And I know that's disappointing, and I'm sorry about that. But this is the purpose of Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any further questions, or feel free to ask more at the Teahouse if you'd like to get a broader audience. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 12:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, r I resubmitted with the original sources, I'm new to wikipedia so kinda not good at editing and using the tools. I accidently submitted the same old draft, please accept the final article which I submitted few minutes ago. It has all the citations and references and links to the original sources. Apologize me for any inconvenience. Krypton369 (talk) 12:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- None of your sources actually discuss the "quantum economic model" itself. Instead, they discuss various bits and pieces of this model, without discussing the whole. This is called synthesis, because you're "synthesizing" information from multiple reliable sources to reach a conclusion not explicitly supported by any of them; this is a form of original research, and as such is not allowed on Wikipedia, due to original research being unverifiable by definition. It's not enough to have a bunch of sources talking about capitalism, UBI, etc. to have an article on something called the "quantum economic model"; you need sources that talk specifically about the "quantum economic model" itself. If those sources don't exist, then there cannot be an article on this topic. Indeed, to the extent that this seems like a Wikipedia article at all, it just seems like an article on just the concept of universal basic income, and obviously that article already exists on Wikipedia. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 12:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Economic Model, The future of economics (July 23)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quantum Economic Model, The future of economics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.