User talk:KrivisKrivaitis

This is KrivisKrivaitis's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonas Misiūnas (1911) (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonas Misiūnas (1911) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonas Misiūnas (1911), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbrks (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KrivisKrivaitis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbrks (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonas Misiūnas has been accepted

Jonas Misiūnas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Renata•3 02:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pauk (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pauk (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mvqr (talk) 16:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pauk (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pauk (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pauk (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvqr (talk) 09:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Juozas Vitkus is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonas Misiūnas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partisan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Lithuania

Thank you for contributing to Lithuania related articles!

I just noticed your edits to Lithuania-related articles and thought you would like to join the Lithuania WikiProject, an initiative to improve coverage of Lithuania-related topics on Wikipedia. You can read the top 10 tips for Lithuanian editors, ask a question, get updates on new articles, and figure out the best way you can help.

To stay informed you might want to add the WikiProject page to your watchlist and sign up. Feel free to join anytime!

-- Pofka (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Andrius Domaševičius

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andrius Domaševičius, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nominations

Labas, I noticed that you regularly create new articles of Lithuanian personalities that are informative, well-referenced and of high quality. AČIŪ.
I suggest you to nominate your newly created articles in the Template talk:Did you know as once a hook (an interesting note) related with the nominated article is published in a section of the Main Page its number of readers increases significantly for a period of 24 hours. You can find all the requirements (rules) of this procedure here: Wikipedia:Did you know#DYK rules, however the main principles of it are that the newly article: 1) was created in the last seven days; 2) is well-referenced; 3) has over 1,500 characters of prose (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, etc.); 4) the hook used in the nomination is included and supported by reference/references in the article.
Pay attention that the first five DYK nominations are free, however afterwards in order to submit more DYK nominations you will have to review a DYK nomination proposed by other user for every subsequent DYK nomination of yours (see more information here: Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide).
I think this article about Andrius Domaševičius you recently created would be a perfect fit for DYK nomination (and it is still not yet older than seven days). By the way, I recommend you to archive your used references in the Wayback Machine as it will protect them from becoming inaccessible dead links in the future. AČIŪ once again for creating quality content about Lithuania and good luck. :) -- Pofka (talk) 21:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, here are some additional tips regarding the DYK procedure: thanks for submitting a new DYK nomination about Lithuania. However, it currently has an issue and reviewer cannot pass it as Domaševičius was one of the founders of the party (not the only founder), so please update the hook and I think it will be confirmed. By the way, in the future keep in mind that in the DYK nomination you have to provide a quote from the source which support the hook so that the reviewer could easily WP:VERIFY if the hook is correct, and it should be properly referenced in the article as well (add reference template at the end of the sentence as I done HERE). See my earlier DYK nomination as a proper example HERE. I recommend you to check your DYK nominations regularly once you submit the hook so that it would not be rejected for minor issues.

Additional tips regarding archiving links: It is not required to replace URLs in the article with Wayback Machine links in the references once you have them archived in the Wayback Machine. You can keep the original URLs, but once the link becomes a dead link (I think it is regularly checked by Wikipedia's bots-robots) a template Template:Dead link is added and bots-robots (or other users) will try to rescue the references by checking internet archiving websites such as Wayback Machine. Eventually, new parameters "|archive-url=", "|archive-date=", "|url-status=dead" will be added to the reference template (see more information here: Wikipedia:Link rot#Internet archives).

Additional tips regarding referencing: I suggest you to add reference templates after every sentence in the article so that it would be easy to WP:VERIFY content in the future, especially while using Lithuanian language references. Researching Lithuanian sources for non-Lithuanian users is very difficult (as in your DYK nominations case). Moreover, if somebody will add additional content between the sentences in the future the connection with the reference could be further complicated. So a reference template after every sentence is really useful and necessary in high quality articles. -- Pofka (talk) 11:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Andrius Domaševičius

On 7 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andrius Domaševičius, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the founders of the Lithuanian Social Democratic Party, Andrius Domaševičius, had his own private gynecology practice, treating poor women free of charge? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andrius Domaševičius. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Andrius Domaševičius), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Howdy - I saw your edits and additions at Ričardas Gavelis. Quick note: 'alchetron' is one of many Wikipedia mirrors - sites that copy our content under license. This one typically copies older versions of the articles here, and then sprinkles them with stolen images. Just in case you run into it again, there's no need to re-word our articles, and we can't use them as a source for obvious reasons. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the message, I'll keep that in mind. Thought the page needed a revision anyway KrivisKrivaitis (talk) 11:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pavel Bermondt-Avalov

added links pointing to Entente, Georgian, Karaite, Galicia, New York, Ensign and Georgia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jonas Aistis

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from lt.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pavel Bermondt-Avalov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Riga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Jonas Žilius-Jonila

Thank you for creating Jonas Žilius-Jonila!

However, for you own benefit, I would like to tell you that currently, the shortened footnotes (sfn) you added, don't point to the books in bibliography. The bibliography books are supposed to be in the style of template:cite book, just like in this edit here that I did to the article, so that when the reader clicks on the citation while reading the text, he will be taken directly to the book in the bibliography.

I hope this helps! +JMJ+ (talk) 11:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi KrivisKrivaitis. Thank you for your work on Borisas Dauguvietis. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi KrivisKrivaitis. Thank you for your work on Laurentius Boierus. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ignacy Żagiell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thebes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]