User talk:Krimp Varkey

This is Krimp Varkey's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lemmy (software) (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lemmy (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krimp Varkey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Compusolus (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Krimp Varkey. Thank you for your work on Just an Ordinary Day. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your new articles on Simenon's romans durs

Hello there

Thanks for your great work in creating these articles. The only concern I have is that you consistently use the French title of the novels in the articles. This is contrary to policy which states: "If the book is best known by an English title, use that version of the title." So if a book has been translated into English, the most-commonly known English title should be used. See, for example, the article on Camus' The Stranger. Would you mind renaming the articles with the titles of the English translations where applicable?

Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 01:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Aemilius Adolphin, my apologies, I was not aware of this and will happily make the changes you suggest when I can get access to my laptop again, which should be in a week or two (it's very hard to write articles on my phone!). Best, Krimp Varkey (talk) 01:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've finally had a chance to make the changes you suggested for The Glass Cage, The Disappearance of Odile, and The Mahé Circle. Please have a look at them and let me know what you think! Best, Krimp Varkey (talk) 23:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Krimp Varkey. Thank you for your work on Belle (1952 novel). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Krimp Varkey. Nice work on your new article. In my opinion, it would be improved by adding it to one or more appropriate Wikiprojects. Good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Bastun}} Hello, glad you liked it! 🙂 Can you suggest what would be some appropriate Wikiprojects to add? Not sure I've ever done that for an article before 🤔 Krimp Varkey (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]