User talk:Kramler
This user may have left Wikipedia. Kramler has not edited Wikipedia since 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Judiciary move
[edit]Glad we could standardize that, and great to see this expanded too. So many topics to still write/improve... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Yes, some parts of Europe are seriously underserved in terms of editorial attention. Very few articles in general but plenty of articles that need to be renamed. Let me know if anything catches your eye specifically. I'd be very happy to assist you with other moves/fixes as well. Kramler (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ministry of Justice (Austria), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josef Moser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Well done on improving the article on Mireille Miller-Young - particularly in covering the controversy, which is definitely a complicated topic. I also want to thank you for cleaning up the article, which was created by a student I oversee with my main account (Shalor (Wiki Ed)). ReaderofthePack (。◕‿◕。) 18:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much; it's sincerely appreciated! Kramler (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judiciary of Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feldkirch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judiciary of Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imperial Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to join Women in Red
[edit] Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.64% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 06:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi there, Kramer, and welcome to Women in Red. You've been doing a great job with your biographies of Austrian ministers and related articles. I hope you will be inspired to write about many more Austrian women. If you run into any difficulties or need any help, please let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Michael Ludwig
[edit]Well apparently people really do think that some athlete is equally as relevant as the head of a country's capital and largest city, which in some way is almost hitting near-racist levels but whatever. Still thanks for your engagement in my article. Colonestarrice (talk) 13:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Colonestarrice: I wasn't expecting that either. It's certainly silly, but I don't think it's hostility. I think they honestly don't know any better. Two reasons:
- We're a tiny country that doesn't do anything and that nobody has any reason to think about very much. My sister lives in the Netherlands; do you know how often Austria makes the news there? Nope, too high :) (I think Austrians being in denial about this point is part of the reason half the Austria articles are so full of crap.)
- The article doesn't actually demonstrate how notable the mayor of Vienna really is. I could write a stub about the mayor of Perchtoldsdorf that would look exactly the same. I'm sure we could convince the admins if you grew the article into something real. (I'm not going to expand the article myself because I'm not really all that interested in politicians and there is more than enough legal system work to do. It's your baby; consider doing something with it.)
- You're very welcome for the help, but I do note you showed your appreciation with yet another pointless troll edit against the CC article :) The dumb spamfobox you insist on adds one factual error and two other disimprovements, why oh why would you keep doing that :/ Kramler (talk) 01:39, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Well let me be honest (and this is nothing personal) but your Infobox is ugly. If you want i can make a template which is an exact copy of the Hight Court Infobox but for Austrian courts and you can remove and add the parameters you want, but please keep the basic structure.
- I guess your right with that, although Austria (especially Franz Joseph) is responsible for both World Wars and had a central role in European History, it grew irrelevant over the time.
- I'm currently working on a general revision of the Van der Bellen article, so that at least one article about an Austrian politician isn't 2 centimeters long and there a lot of other organs, politicians and offices that either have to be created or improved as well, so expanding the Ludwig article sadly isn't on top of my list.
- And a personal question (which you of course do not have to answer): because you mentioned Perchtoldsdorf, are you from there? Colonestarrice (talk) 02:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Colonestarrice: Alright, a few words on infoboxes :)
- One of the disimprovements that your edit adds is the authority line. What you're saying is not directly wrong, but it's... well, it's just not that simple. The line doesn't really make a lot of sense in the context of the Austrian constitutional framework. We'd have to add some caveats. Which would add yet more pointless clutter to the article. So it's a distraction at best and disinformation at worst. Now, why did you add this line in the first place? Because the template suggested to you that you do that. Because the parameter is there.
- The conventional infobox was designed by and for people from the Anglosphere. It contains a number of parameters that are easy to use correctly and meaningfully in their legal framework but not in ours. Editors of Austrian articles use these parameters anyway, adding information that is kind of true but also inappropriate or misleading in some way or other. (Example: You use the budget parameter for ministries. Thanks to our system of Mittelbare Bundesverwaltung, these figures do no mean what anybody thinks they mean. Unless you're intimately familiar with the subtleties of the Austrian Kompetenzverteilung and die Austrian Finanzausgleich, both of which are globally unique, you have no idea what the effective budgets are and the official figures tell you nothing. I've read like five books on Komptetenzverteilung and I couldn't even begin to guess.)
- Some of the template docs specifically say that editors should think before they add stuff and that concise, selective infoboxes are better than infoboxes that try too hard. Nobody cares. People just like adding stuff. They think they're helping. They take it personally when you tell them they aren't, even if you do your very best to be diplomatic about it. Judging from a few edit histories I looked at before I went to work, this can be a semi-constant nuisance. So I made a new infobox that I hoped would sidestep the issue through not containing any of the problematic parameters.
- So you say it's ugly. Fine, it's ugly. I'm not a designer, I was just trying to prevent disinformation and stupid edit wars. Looks like that didn't quite work out :D
- I'm actually from Vienna. Well, I was born there and I grew up there. My family is from all over the place. Kramler (talk) 21:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
[edit] Hello again from Women in Red!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
August 2018 at Women in Red
[edit] An exciting new month for Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Austrian agency
[edit]Template:Infobox Austrian agency has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 17:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Keyserlingk
[edit]This edit bothers me, maybe unreasonably: [1]. I remember Keyserlingk as supporting the original version but it looks like Google Books disagrees with me. Hit the library for me please? I tried emailing you but it says you don't have a Wikipedia email address. Damvile (talk) 00:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Damvile: You remember wrong, but there are some other books that support the original version:
- Thaler, Peter (2001). The Ambivalence of Identity. The Austrian Experience of Nation-Building in a Modern Society. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press. ISBN 1-55753-201-X. Pages 166–175: An overwhelming majority of Austrians currently alive do not believe that Austrians are Germans. The majority in question has been steadily growing over the decades. In 1956, about 46 percent of those polled believed that Austrians were part of the German people. By 1987, that number was down to 9 percent. Some of the relevant surveys have been criticized as methodologically dubious but the overall result is clear enough.
- Barth-Scalmani, Gunda; Kuprian, Herbert; Mazohl-Wallnig, Brigitte (1997). "National Identity or Regional Identity". In Bischof, Günter; Pelinka, Anton. Austrian Historical Memory and National Identity. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. ISBN 1-56000-902-0. Pages 32–63: Austrian nationals (without immigrant background) who claim they do not consider themselves ethnically Austrian usually claim they are ethnically Tyrolean or Salzburgian. They do not claim to be ethnically German.
- Pelinka, Anton (1998). Austria. Out of the Shadow of the Past. Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-2918-3. Page 21: None of the above is surprising given the fallout from the war.
- I set an email address; email away. Kramler (talk) 12:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Smashing, thanks a lot! Damvile (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- You've got mail. I'm not sure why but Wikipedia suggests that I notify you on your talk page. Have a nice weekend. Damvile (talk) 00:41, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
[edit] September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ernst Streeruwitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arbeiter-Zeitung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Austria
[edit]Thank you for the notice that you placed on User talk:Denis tarasov. Depending on how he reacts, this edit conflict may go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. If it does, then one of the questions asked is whether there was an attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page. I strongly advise you to make a post on Talk:Austria explaining why you reverted Denis tarasov's edits. Do not wait to see whether he does first.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Toddy1: Done! Thank you for your advice. Kramler (talk) 10:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johannes Schober, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Social Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
You've got mail!
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Colonestarrice (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Since you did not reply to my latest mail I just want to make sure here that you: received it and agree? Colonestarrice (talk) 21:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies. I replied just now; it's on. Kramler (talk) 21:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Breisky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Social Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
[edit]Great article creation in Second Schober government! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 00:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
- SshibumXZ, thank you very much! Nice to feel appreciated :D Kramler (talk) 20:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 at Women in Red
[edit] Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
[edit] Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Failed ping
[edit]The ping probably didn't reach you again so just that you know: User:Colonestarrice/Infobox commander in chief/doc. Colonestarrice (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- Colonestarrice: The ping worked, I just wasn't online for a few days. I'm happy to help; give me a few hours. Kramler (talk) 22:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Great, thanks! Colonestarrice (talk) 22:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kramler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
[edit] The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
January events:
|
February 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111
February events:
|
March 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
April editathons at Women in Red
[edit]April 2019
[edit] April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
[edit] May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR
[edit] June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red!
[edit] July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
[edit] October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December events with WIR
[edit] December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
[edit] January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February with Women in Red
[edit] February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
[edit] March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
[edit] April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
[edit] May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
[edit]Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December with Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
[edit]Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 with Women in Red
[edit]Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red
[edit] Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
[edit]Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May Women in Red events
[edit]Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
[edit]Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
[edit]Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2023
[edit]Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
[edit] Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
[edit] Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
[edit] Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
[edit] Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit] Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
[edit] Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit] Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red
[edit] Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
[edit] Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit] Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination for deletion of Template:Sfnaut
[edit]Template:Sfnaut has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rjjiii (talk) 03:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023
[edit] Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2024
[edit]Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging