Jump to content

User talk:KplusWequalsU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

KplusWequalsU, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]

☁

Teahouse logo

Hi KplusWequalsU! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Revelation 13:18 (rapper)

[edit]

Hello, KplusWequalsU. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Revelation 13:18".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revelation 13:18 (rapper) (February 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
this is a promotional bio full of pretty much every possible fake news source on the internet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 19:13, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]
Information icon

Hello KplusWequalsU. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KplusWequalsU. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KplusWequalsU|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 14:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Draft:Revelation 13:18 (rapper) while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. GSS 💬 07:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was not my intention I didn't log into my account when I made the edit to reverse draft to older version sorry for the confusion Thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

[edit]

Stop leaving message on my talk page. I am not interested.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop posting your incessant messages to the talk pages of multiple users. It will not help, and is considered disruptive to waste the time of multiple editors with the same issue. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry a novice at Wikipedia you have crawl before you walk need help please!!! KplusWequalsU (talk) 06:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry a novice at Wikipedia you have to crawl before you walk need help please!!! Trying to find an editor gracious enough to help? KplusWequalsU (talk) 06:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KplusWequalsU, Just dropping the same message around is probably not the best solution. What help exactly are you seeking? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I need the article edited all the way stripped down the specifications of all the advice given that I seemed out I am novice and need page edited fully so I am reaching out to the Wikipedia community for help thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I need the article edited all the way stripped down to the specifications of all the advice given that I seeked out I am novice and need page edited fully so I am reaching out to the Wikipedia community for help thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 06:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KplusWequalsU, Other people are not going to create the draft for you, our volunteer base is stretched too thin. Please go back and read my feedback at the AfC talk page. The gist of it: if something isn't supported by a reliable source, remove it. I identified a number of bad sources in the article. Remove them and what they support. It can't get much easier than that. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. As previously warned. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThatMontrealIP, This should be taken to AIV if this continues. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw CaptainEek is online, perhaps they can help.ThatMontrealIP (talk)
ThatMontrealIP I've already been acquainted with this user. I gave them some feedback at AfC, they then left that exact message on my talk page. We talked back and forth for a bit, I assumed things had been worked out. Guess not. I will respond above again and hope that does the trick. Otherwise, feel free to report them at AIV, I will leave that block to someone else as I feel fairly involved. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming the same message across Wikipedia, especially on pages that have nothing to do with your draft. As a warning, I will delete any messages you leave on my talk page regarding your draft. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok noted KplusWequalsU (talk) 07:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KplusWequalsU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here this account is not associated with the article are reaching out to the Wikipedia community for edits thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We aren't here to clean up after you; you need to figure out what to do yourself. Please do not ask multiple users the same question, this duplicates effort. There are places like the Teahouse or Help Desk to seek help from the community as a whole. Regarding the block, it is only a username block. Your username cannot be that of your agency per the username policy(even if abbreviated). Your username must indicate that a specific individual is exclusively operating your account and granting no one else access to it. You do not need to use your real name, just something unique to you. Please propose a new username. While you are waiting, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for formal disclosures you need to make. 331dot (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin. This user is still continuing to harass user's talk pages about their article. Doesn't seem they understand nor are they willing to stop trying to promote their subject. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am on Wikipedia trying to get help if I leave a message on someones talk page it's because I am seeking out someone to help edit the article if I leave a message on someone's talk page then its up to them to respond to my request nobody vis harassing anybody just seeking help from the Wikipedia community thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 05:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's is a Wikipedia community if you can't ask for help? KplusWequalsU (talk) 05:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not requesting a new username what is Wikipedia if you can't ask for help ?KplusWequalsU (talk) 05:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)}} at the bottom of your talk[reply]

I have removed your duplicate unblock requests- you only need one open request. Subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments. 331dot (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KplusWequalsU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Was told by admin to request another user name Thanks Sorry For the confusion asking people in the community for help I submitted to tea house wiki hip hop project etc. I would love to continue you be apart of the wikipedia community thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This username has considerable disruptive potential, and so is not acceptable under our username policy. Yunshui 雲水 09:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

solution 123 This username should not be considered disruptive could you please change user name an unblock account sorry for the misunderstanding of Wikipedia guidelines Thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 18:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was said by waggie to come clean about article concerning the hip hop artist nobody is getting paid for creating the article I am a follower of this artist and wanted to create a wiki page to be a contributor on Wikipedia to his wiki page as I am a citzen in the community but not in the hip hop world and this would of made me more apart of his experience Thank that's my stance on the article creation KplusWequalsU (talk) 00:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
solution123 This username should not be considered disruptive could you please change user name an unblock account sorry for the misunderstanding of Wikipedia guidelines Thanks KplusWequalsU (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I plan on contributing to hip hop wiki project and other entertainment articles I am an avid hip hop fanKplusWequalsU (talk) 19:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin, this editor has a clear COI with the subject of the draft they were attempting to create. I would suggest that a condition of any unblock be that they come clean about this connection, in addition to the other suggested conditions. If they refuse to come clean, then it's clear they will not respect our policies and guidelines. Waggie (talk) 03:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed 4 additional unblock requests. Please do not make any more requests. One will do, and when a renamer has a chance to look this over they will. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KplusWequalsU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Please change my username to despair1813427 sorry for the misunderstanding of Wikipedia guidelines and multiple requests.

Decline reason:

User states below that they have registered a new account under that name. As such, I am declining this request on strictly procedural grounds. Simply abandon "KplusWequalsU" if you have not already and continue on despair1813427. TheSandDoctor Talk 07:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion and rename discussion.

[edit]
  • I'd like a second look by the community, please, to make sure this is really not a catchphrase of Knowledge + Wisdom = Understanding Inc. Google does seem to connect the concept, but perhaps in a more metaphysical way. Measure twice, rename once.
  • KplusWequalsU, you must read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. I would oppose unblocking if your only reason for being here is to edit about subjects you have a vested interest in promoting.
  • RE: Community help. The WMF already reaps the fruit of my labor and that of all the unpaid volunteers on this project. I see no reason why we should serve as your unpaid interns making money for you via our labor.
  • If anyone would like to know the basis of my assertions, please feel free to email me. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Deepfriedokra, trueandliving most likely is. I was bored and did a deep dive. The company and person associated with it reguarly make reference off-wiki to the Five Percent Nation. The name Five Percent Nation comes from the following quote from Lost-Found Muslim Lesson No. 2 of the Nation of Islam (shortened for brevity): "Ten percent of the world's population are described as the rich; the slave-makers of the poor; who teach the poor lies --- to believe that the Almighty, True and Living God is a spook and cannot be seen by the physical eye.", quoted from here Sulfurboy (talk) 00:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like we already have a user by that name. Is it You? --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 07:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Deepfriedokra that user is me thanks Despair 1813427 on wikimedia confirmed can you process the username change appreciate it.

Yes that user is me thanks Despair 1813427 on wikimedia confirmed can you process the username change appreciate it. KplusWequalsU (talk) 03:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If that is you and you already have the account, then just don't use this one and move to that account. That is permissible under WP:SOCKLEGIT so long as you cease using this account. --TheSandDoctor Talk 07:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to change my username that's why I created that account in Mediawiki can you approve the name change please

I just want to use this account with that username despair1813427 I don't want 2 accounts can you approve that name change KplusWequalsU (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 30671

[edit]

UTRS #30671 was submitted on 2020-05-21 09:42:28 . This review is now closed. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KplusWequalsU (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KplusWequalsU&oldid=1043821625"