User talk:Kpddg/Archives/ 2022/March

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kpddg. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yash Dhull (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Yash Dhull instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please compare and consolidate article and draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yash Dhull and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yash Dhull, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Kpddg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for removing my post! It was on Vernon Jones page. I did not intentionally vandalize. But I thank you sincerely for your honest correction and constructive criticism.

Have a wonderful day 173.28.213.150 (talk) 02:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

No problem, just keep in mind to edit constructively in the future. And also, creating an account has many benefits, rather than editing as an IP address. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 03:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Not named

Hi, did you see the response on my TalkPage? Thank you, I was removing the Roman error part labelling these cemeteries as Badarian, but the full dental study is still relevant. 102.217.80.26 (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello. In this edit, you removed sourced content without explaining why. So it was reverted. You can use an appropriate edit summary to describe your changes. As for the other one, you can restore it if there is no dispute. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 10:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Mz7 (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! I will use this constructively. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 09:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

What

What is wrong in my recent edit why you revert it???? Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

@Ripomobo11, I have mentioned the reasons on Talk: MS Dhoni, where you had earlier responded. And I did not completely revert your edit, but modified it. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 01:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pamzeis -- Pamzeis (talk) 01:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

I did not know that...

Hello, I wasn't aware of that policy WP: RMCOMMENT, Its first time ever I was suggesting to title rename for a page.Success think (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

No problem. I just wanted to inform you. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 05:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I want to make an article about a celebrity who is not listed on Wikipedia

Please TheInternetContributer (talk) 16:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Please read the replies other users have said about you at the Teahouse and at your talk page instead of asking the same question over and over again. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 17:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)