User talk:Kovac09

Welcome!

Hello, Kovac09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joaquin008 ^(talk) 06:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Serbia

An Invite to join WikiProject Serbia

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Serbia articles or that you are in some way connected to Serbia. I thought you may be interested in joining
Wikipedia:WikiProject Serbia

They are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Serbia. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Members Page!
Thank You.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Constantine Bodin appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 10:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Serbia portal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Ucucha 11:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to History of the Serbs. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. This is extremely important - please don't be surprised if your edits get reverted because you haven't used edit summaries. Dougweller (talk) 04:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to History of the Serbs, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Please stop marking edits as minor, this misleads other editors, especially combined with your lack of edit summaries Dougweller (talk) 04:58, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste from other articles

It is a copyright violation if you do this without attributing it to the other article, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks. I know you are new, but this is the time to start making sure you get it right. Dougweller (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citing your sources

I realise you are trying to do this, which is good. However, you need to make sure that your citation method is the same type that is used elsewhere in the article, and that you give page numbers to books. WP:CITE is probably the best place to start. If you need help with anything to do with editing Wikipedia, you can ask at WP:HELPDESK. Dougweller (talk) 05:13, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about your edits

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 14:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for sock puppetry or meat puppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

In the event of an appeal, please see Vrghs jacob (talk · contribs) and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive639#Kovac09. -Selket ^Talk 16:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kovac09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand, it says i'm being blocked because of Sock puppetry ([1]), this is clearly an error made by Selket as I am not jacob nor have I ever seen jacob on Wikipedia as we have totally different areas of interest, just compare our contributions

Decline reason:

Well, how about Ajdebre (talk · contribs) or SlavSlav (talk · contribs)? You are most certainly them. TN X Man 20:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.