User talk:Kornff

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kornff. Thank you for creating Arthur Langerman. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Can you please remove the links in the sections. Illegal per policy.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 14:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Planetiva. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 06:49, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kornff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not the people listed in the investigation. My IP address is not from the same provider as theirs. I do not see any other evidence linking me to them. I could not be their WP:SOCK: one of the accounts has been inactive for 1.5 years and the other is unconfirmed and started editing long after me. If I was them, I would have easily created the article myself directly (not as a draft). Kornff (talk) 09:42, 21 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

As explained in the long discussion with the blocking administrator that you deleted from this page, sockpuppetry takes many forms and includes off-site coordination by multiple individuals. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.