User talk:KormiSK

Welcome!

Hello, KingisNitro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Glucosone.png

Thanks for uploading File:Glucosone.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alcohol oxidase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NAD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Insaniquarium characters

The article List of Insaniquarium characters has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––FormalDude talk 05:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Insaniquarium characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Insaniquarium characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Insaniquarium characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

For respecting AfD process during the List of Insaniquarium Characters deletion discussion! Dronebogus (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cytidine diphosphate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S. aureus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:DFHBI.png

Thanks for uploading File:DFHBI.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EC numbers

Hi KingisNitro

I noticed you had made this change and this one to articles I have recently edited and are on my watchlist. Your edit summary was EC numbers are for enzymes, not reactions. Your edits are unhelpful because, as Enzyme Commission number says (based on reliable sources) EC numbers do not specify enzymes but enzyme-catalyzed reactions. If different enzymes (for instance from different organisms) catalyze the same reaction, then they receive the same EC number. An EC number is a unique identifier for a reaction: it cannot be unique for an enzyme because the amino-acid sequence of proteins can vary considerably while not changing the function of the enzyme. There are UniProt identifiers which uniquely specify a protein by its amino acid sequence but that's not what I was using in my edits. Please go back and restore the versions of these articles and similarly revert any other such changes you have made to other articles I may not have noticed. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael D. Turnbull: Hi there, I will not be reverting those changes. The page Enzyme Commission number, that you have linked as well, states "The Enzyme Commission number (EC number) is a numerical classification scheme for enzymes, based on the chemical reactions they catalyze." By definition, Enzyme Commission number defines the ENZYME that catalyzes the reaction, e.g. "alcohol dehydrogenase", not the reaction itself. The reaction is described (and classifies the enzymes) by the numbers. The fact that the enzyme can have multiple primary sequences does not mean that it is not the same enzyme (i.e., catalyzing the same reaction).

The source page for the sentence you have singled out, http://www.expasy.org/enzyme/, does not even mention the word "reaction" and I have no idea why it is linked as a "reliable" source, as it does not say whatever it is supposed to be backing up. The sentence I've picked out is linked to a source called "Enzyme nomenclature" - after all, we're naming enzymes. Same goes for Enzyme nomenclature by IUBMB - it's an enzyme nomenclature, not reaction nomenclature. I do not mind the numbers being linked on the page, but you cannot say it is "catalyzing reaction EC 1.1.1.1", as "EC 1.1.1.1" = "alcohol dehydrogenase". Also with that said, even what you said isn't true - the numbers do not mention a specific reaction, as EC 1.1.1.1 can catalyze both primary and secondary alcohols, i.e. the reaction is ambiguous. If you wish, edit all of those pages to say "it is catalyzed by [enzyme name] [EC number]". KingisNitro (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of the most reliable sources (the first external link in the Enzyme Commission number article) is this one, which uses the word "reaction" many times, notably to say Classification of Enzymes by the Reactions they Catalyse and Furthermore, because classification is based solely on the reaction catalysed, there are cases where proteins of very different sequences catalyse the same reaction. The point is that this is a classification scheme not a naming scheme. I think that it is perfectly reasonable to want to help readers of Wikipedia article go straight to the reliable databases of information on enzymes using the {{EC number}} template. It is true that we could use text like "X is formed from Y in the reaction catalysed by the enzyme Z EC 2.7.6.1. but I don't believe it is correct to remove the templates entirely, as you did. To your point on alcohol dehydrogenase being able to catalyse a reaction of primary or secondary alcohols that's absolutely true: in the view of an organic chemist they are the same reaction, just on different substrates, and that's precisely what the EC number suggests. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael D. Turnbull: That sentence I am okay with. However, we're talking about substrate pages; I do not see a reason to include EC codes for the enzymes on the page of the substrate. The enzyme name is listed, if you want to know more about it and the reaction, that is why the specific page exists. It does not need all be crammed in there, esp. with the template.

As for the link, I've already sent that and it says "The complete contents of Enzyme Nomenclature, 1992 (plus subsequent supplements and other changes) are listed below in enzyme number order giving just the recommended name. Each entry provides a link to details of that enzyme. Alternatively if looking for a specific reaction used in the classification of enzymes the broad outline defined by the first two numbers are given below." It might be a classification scheme, but it still comes from enzyme nomenclature, not reaction nomenclature (as there is no such thing, to my knowledge).

The point with alcohol dehydrogenase completely invalidates the point you're making about the reactions, however. Enzymes with the same EC number catalyzing multiple different reactions (or similar reactions of different substrates) mean that you cannot use the number to define a specific reaction. At best, you can say it is a "dehydration" or "dexarboxylation", but you do not need to use the EC number for that at all. I still stand by the removal of that specific sentence and if you want, you can write them back in the format you proposed in your last reply ("X is formed from Y in the reaction catalysed by the enzyme Z EC 2.7.6.1."). Still don't see the reason to mention specific EC numbers on substrate pages, though. KingisNitro (talk) 13:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm happy with your view that the enzyme's name/page link gives readers enough information. In those cases where I think it helpful to use the template in addition (not on the specific cases you altered yesterday), I'll use the XYZ wording that we have consensus for. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:4-Oxalocrotonate tautomerase reaction.png

Thanks for uploading File:4-Oxalocrotonate tautomerase reaction.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Split proposal

When suggesting pages be split or merged, be sure to start a discussion on the talk page stating why you think the pages should be split or merged. Cheers, Mdewman6 (talk) 01:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,055	Nucleotide (talk)	Add sources
920	Source code (talk)	Add sources
7	Orotidine 5'-monophosphate (talk)	Add sources
3	5-Formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide (talk)	Add sources
117	Code of law (talk)	Add sources
840	Alexander von Humboldt (talk)	Add sources
222	Anomer (talk)	Cleanup
230	Fluorophore (talk)	Cleanup
32	Purinergic signalling (talk)	Cleanup
78	Tenofovir alafenamide (talk)	Expand
6	CAPRISA 004 (talk)	Expand
64	Expanded genetic code (talk)	Expand
82	Non-proteinogenic amino acids (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20	Adenosine monophosphate deaminase deficiency type 1 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
157	Selenocysteine (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
186	Isotopes of nitrogen (talk)	Merge
399	Topical medication (talk)	Merge
1,326	Rust shooting incident (talk)	Merge
470	Acetyl-CoA (talk)	Wikify
8	Cardioprotection (talk)	Wikify
60	Physical organic chemistry (talk)	Wikify
2	Fumarate lyase (talk)	Orphan
2	Gua Operon (talk)	Orphan
6	Purinosome (talk)	Orphan
4	Nucleoside-diphosphatase (talk)	Stub
22	Homoserine (talk)	Stub
5	5-Hydroxyisourate (talk)	Stub
10	Phosphoribosylaminoimidazolesuccinocarboxamide synthase (talk)	Stub
5	Aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (talk)	Stub
2	5′-Phosphoribosyl-4-carboxy-5-aminoimidazole (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi KingisNitro! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:10, Monday, September 12, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]