User talk:Kopanishyn

February 2024

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kostyantyn Kopanishyn (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kostyantyn Kopanishyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kopanishyn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Kopanishyn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Kostyantyn Kopanishyn, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kostyantyn Kopanishyn (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any improvement. Next time I will reject this outright.

There is no evidence that the subject is notable.

Most of the content is unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kostyantyn Kopanishyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you claim: that my account was used for advertising or promotion purposes purposes. Is it a joke? I don't understand where it was used for advertising. provide me with all the facts of my violation of the policies, based on which I am blocked. in the meantime, I believe that your actions are illegal Kopanishyn (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kopanishyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: I don’t understand the reason for blocking my account: I didn’t break any rules anywhere, I behaved correctly in accordance with the policies. I don’t understand why I should appeal in principle? It seems to me that my freedom of speech is being limited and I would like to know the exact reason for blocking my account.

Decline reason:

The action of blocking you is not illegal - we have the right to block users from this site. You do not have freedom of speech here - this is a private website and we can delete pages and block users without infringing your rights. In order for you to be unblocked, you need to say what edits you want to make. You should carefully read the feedback you have been given on this page, and not try to repeat your mistakes. PhilKnight (talk) 20:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kopanishyn (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Please be careful with words like 'illegal'; anything that could be construed as a legal threat will not help your case, quite the opposite, in fact. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kopanishyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon. let's try again. I haven’t been on Wikipedia for a long time and perhaps I didn’t speak quite clearly

I don’t want to offend anyone and respect all administrators and users of this site

but I also respect myself. and when my account is blocked after trying to publish an article about a man who fought for Ukraine during the Russian invasion, it bothers me. It’s not the fact of blocking that worries me - if I really broke something, I would still understand and fix it. But I am confused with the purposes.

https://monosnap.com/file/o2FboHV5uyVNhlOxnyRUMyOdqdEy2s

I don’t understand what I’m being accused of and how to fix it.

Once again I ask you to make a specific reference to where this advertisement was.

The chronology of events is as follows:

1. I wrote a draft of the article, which I submitted for consideration for further publication;

2. The draft was rejected due to lack of resources. I would clarify again what resources are missing - I have already used everything that is in electronic form. and the same articles in Russian and Ukrainian languages were successfully moderated;

3. I apparently mistakenly sent the draft again without edits;

4. After that my account was blocked. argument - advertising.

Am I the only one who doesn’t see the logic in all this? Kopanishyn (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have sources that document his death and he earned a military decoration- but any article about this soldier must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about him and his life. Government decrees and documents are primary sources. There are more appropriate forums to honor and document soldiers who have fought and died for Ukraine; Wikipedia is not for that purpose. It's possible that the Ukrainian Wikipedia may have different rules about what is acceptable, and that this may be acceptable there, but it isn't here. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kopanishyn, I've converted your first unblock request to a comment. You are permitted only one unblock request at a time.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kostyantyn Kopanishyn

Hello, Kopanishyn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kostyantyn Kopanishyn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]