User talk:Konor20001

Hi.

Welcome to my talk page. Konor20001 (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Breń, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to BWC Corporation. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BWC Corporation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BWC Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BWC Company

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BWC Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mvqr (talk) 14:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Konor20001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to add a company. I hear that it is not a serious company. I will stop creating vandalous pages. Take a look at my previous edits and know that my edits are in good faith and for the better for wikipedia. Thank you. Konor20001 (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm concerned that either you genuinely didn't know that A7 didn't apply to your draft about a company created two days ago, and as such lack the skills and knowledge needed to participate here, or you did know and were attempting to perpetuate a hoax on the community and waste the time of editors. Either way, I see no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you, and as such I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Konor20001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for the response. I appreciate it and understand from your point of view that my edits were solely disruptive. I do understand how A7 applies to the BWC Company. I promise to not make any more vandalous edits and I would like just one more chance at editing wikipedia for the better. Thank you. Konor20001 (talk) 15:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocking after 10 days as a last chance. Please see below. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Konor2001, I'm an administrator reviewing your unblock request. From the deleted article, it looks like you were one of a group of friends who were using Wikipedia to play around, which is not what we are here for, as you hopefully now realize. That being said, your edits did include some legitimate grammatical and typographical corrections to real articles, and I am inclined to give you another chance, if you can explain how you will be a useful contributor if you are unblocked. Also, I'd invite User:Bbb23 and User:331dot to comment on any response you make. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Newyorkbrad, I too would like to know about their contributions, but I'm happy for you to handle this as you will. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello guys. I seem to have posted my response in the wrong place so that you would not be notified. Please see my comment below. @Newyorkbrad: @331dot: Konor20001 (talk) 17:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys @Newyorkbrad: @331dot: Not sure if you saw my message go through. Did you see my response to your message? Let me know. Thank you. Konor20001 (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys. I appreciate you looking over my request. If I’m unblocked I’ll continue going over the level 1 suggested edits. Eventually I’ll learn how to add reliable citations to improve documents and improve stubs further than just small grammatical errors. I’ll eventually move on to creating reliable pages with citations and important and useful information. Thank you. Konor20001 (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

I have unblocked this account. I waited a few days before doing so, based on the past behavior, and to see whether the blocking admin wanted to add any comments. Konor20001, please understand there are other admins who would not have unblocked you. I am giving you another chance because I think your prior bad edits were meant as playful rather than malicious, and that in the future you will make more positive contributions. If you mess around again I think the next block will be much harder for you to overturn, so please don't make that necessary. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Konor20001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. Konor20001 (talk) 20:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We cannot look into this unless you provide your IP address. It should appear in the message that you see when you attempt to make an edit, or you can use a tool like whatismyip.com to determine it. If you do not want to post your IP publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request #2

@331dot:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Konor20001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 204.110.221.42 . Place any further information here. Konor20001 (talk) 20:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. In this case, this is the securily web filter/proxy. Yamla (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clarification (December 2023)

@Yamla: Hi Yamla. I would like to edit. How can I edit? Check my history. I am a good editor.

You need to disable your proxy and wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. --Yamla (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot disable it. Can I get a whitelist permission? Thank you. Konor20001 (talk) 15:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe you would qualify for WP:IPBE, as you have basically not edited in 2023 and have given no reason why you can't disable your proxy. However, you are free to make the application. --Yamla (talk) 15:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do I need to do this? Check my edit history. I'm legit. I'm an experienced editor and will continue to make experienced edits. Konor20001 (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have not yet demonstrated that you need to leave your proxy enabled. You are certainly free to justify this exceptional need and it will be reviewed. --Yamla (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am at a school. I cannot turn it off. Konor20001 (talk) 17:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That, assuming it's true, combined with a claim that you plan to actually use IPBE if granted, and that you are an editor in good standing, would go a long way to being granted IPBE if you applied. --Yamla (talk) 17:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, the instructions are confusing. Do I need to email the email in that page you linked or follow the other directions. Konor20001 (talk) 17:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

@Yamla:

Hello, Konor20001. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Konor20001 (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]