User talk:KnowledgeHegemonyPart2/Archive5

Article alerts

I think you thought I was serious. Go take it to the WP:ANI :) Did you know....Wikipedia:WikiProject Mumbai/Article alerts has been started. It also appears on the Main project Page of WP:MUM. Cheers, Kensplanet^T_C 05:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

If you stop abusing the powers Wikipedia has given you to malign certain countries while presenting India in a partisan manner to hide the negatives, dont expect others to heed to ur whining. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcidd (talk • contribs) 19:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2009

Happy New Year KnowledgeHegemonyPart2/Archive5!!!! I wish for you and your family to have a wonderful 2009!!! Have fun partying and may you make many edits!!!

-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 12:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Wish you and you family a Happy and Prosperous New year--Suyog^{talk to me!} 12:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I wish you a very happy and prosperous new year, despite the fact that with each year you are getting older and closer to death, Muhahaha...! (just playin..., its not like I'm escaping the same fate... :) Shiva (Visnu) 20:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2009, KHP2. Kensplanet^T_C 14:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

History of Mumbai

Hey KHP2. History of Mumbai has been listed as a GA. Your blessings has worked (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kensplanet&diff=260849333&oldid=260846948). Thanks, Kensplanet^T_C 14:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

User check

Happy New Year! Regarding your CU request, could you explain why you think these users are related? Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't think there is enough evidence to merit a CheckUser. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 19:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Well, I am honoured that you've noticed what I consider to be only a little help for what seems to be a pretty awesome team of India related editors and articles. And a bunch of very nice people too! India has always fascinated me, and now some real experts and real Indians can teach me more! That's the absolutely amazing thing about Wiki. It's not just the articles, there are people behind the articles who talk! :D

I will be very quiet over January, because I have other work to do, but in February, I expect I'll enjoy getting involved in all the exciting work at India related articles.

So, a happy new year to you too! Oh editor of the very noble name! :) Alastair Haines (talk) 18:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi 'KnowledgeHegemonyPart2', List of districts of West Bengal has got promoted to FL. Thanks for your comments/suggestions in peer review/FLC review.--GDibyendu (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Excellent userpage! Thanks!

Thanks alot for awarding The Excellent Userpage Award to me. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Note

Here is the reply I had composed to your note - why waste it ? :)

Yes, I am aware of the problem and agree with you that while many of the sources being used by Lalit are reliable, selective citation is being used to give some statistics and the articles from Economist undue weight. In fact, I made a note about this issue on India noticeboard a few hours back. Hopefully we will get some feedback there and be able to establish a consensus on how to deal with this on a project-wide basis since it concerns substantial edits to a large number of articles. Feel free to add your comments/evidence on INB so that we can have a centralized discussion (once the India project editors recover from their holiday swoon :) ). Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks indeed for reverting the vandalism edits at Omar Abdullah article Ekabhishek (talk) 06:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

My gallery up for deletion

Unbeleivably they have put my gallery which you said was "the best page on here" up for deletion. I cannot believe how ridiculous people can be on this site at times, despite having 30 construction pages I am am not permitted to keep a gallery. I am so disgusted by the cheek of this that I am refrianing from editing wikipedia until this silly proposal is dropped The Bald One ^{White cat} 11:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

See my user talk page about maplandia. Do you think he fell for my playing newbie? The Bald One ^{White cat} 19:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Haha! He did! KnowledgeHegemony ^talk 18:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit

Hi friend, Can you please copyedit Hazratbal disappearance episode for me. Thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Over Smart Peoples of Wikipedia

Hi!! You know why we are not able to expand Mum police and MumFB is due to lack of refrences. With out knowing this fact few people on wikipedia (They are not Indian) says that Articles on Vijay Salaskar, Ashok Kamte, Hemant Karkare are useless articles and should be deleted and says ""the relevant page is WP:NOTMEMORIAL: Wikipedia isn't a memorial site for deceased people. All articles on people who are notable only because they were killed in the Mumbai attacks belong merged into Casualties of the 2008 Mumbai attacks""(This article is not written as a Memorial nor as Homage) read thisSAVE THIS THREE ARTICLES FROM DELETION--Suyog^{talk to me!} 10:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Tribal religions in India

Interesting work on Tribal religions in India! --♥pashtun ismailiyya 07:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

FYI

FYI Wiki Raja (talk) 08:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Elcidd

Could you also look into his persistent POV pushing in State terrorism, similar to those in State-sponsored terrorism [1]? he seems to be a nationalist WP:SPA contribs.Builtsoap3 (talk) 22:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Elicidd[2] is back here[3]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.48.138 (talk) 04:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Page move

You redirected State terrorism to State-sponsored terrorism on the grounds that the former is a fork of the latter. How can this be, when the former is more than a year older? Is it normal to move a six-year old article without prior discussion?

17:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

GeorgeNotBungle

I suspect GeorgeNotBungle (talk · contribs · logs) is a sock of Elcidd (talk · contribs · logs). Please check. --KnowledgeHegemony ^talk 18:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Different countries, not the same user. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

blocked them for disruption anyway. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 23:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Message from JSR

The education in India article, a top importance article under WP: India, has recently been rewritten by me. Though the rewrite is is no way complete I invite you to take a look and see, and if possible contribute. Sincerely, JSR 0562 18:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

State-sponsored terrorism

Hi.Could you look into the edits of User:Yousaf465 in State-sponsored terrorism[4]? Particularly in reverting against established consensus here? Thanks.70.112.77.127 (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

A possible sock puppet of User:Yousaf465, User:Strider11, has been engaging in similar edits to multiple articles, including promotion of racist hatred[5], violence[6], and racist conspiracy theories tuted by Pakistan-based Islamic fanatic, Zaid Hamid from Brass Tacks[7].24.28.83.178 (talk) 03:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks a lot for the barnstar! :-)-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 07:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the wishes, too! :-) -Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 19:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Hi. I was wondering if you could provide some input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Indian cinema task force#Reliable sources in Bollywood films articles as there is a disagreement over the reliability and intergrity of this sources. We need to come to a consensus on whether the sites mentioned are valid sources. Thanks. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 22:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Fring theory

Here is the link [8].User:Yousaf465

Reply to your query

I have replied to your quires on article talkpage.User:Yousaf465

Adil your (talk · contribs)

I independently reviewed all of Adil your's edits and did not see any vandalism. Per WP:VAND, "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism." I do not believe that Adil your intended to damage the encyclopedia - nor am I stating that I believe his edits were harmful (I have no opinion). If I am, in fact, wrong, and his edits were not an attempt to improve the encyclopedia, it would be helpful for you to provide, here, a clear explanation. Otherwise, I'll have to insist that you stop calling edits vandalism until you fully understand what vandalism is. Hipocrite (talk) 14:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Well great to get a response from a responsible person!

See this diff Here the added text by Adil your means "Ass fucker" (Hindi:"Gaand chudwai"). How pis this addition productive to Wikipedia? Regards, --KnowledgeHegemony ^talk 14:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Is there a way for me to verify that? Hipocrite (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Well not a RS, but here is Urban dictionary: I got meanings for the verb form ie."gaand chudwaana" ie. "ass+fucking" gand gaand chudwaana --KnowledgeHegemony ^talk 14:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Removing something dosen't disapear it. If he vandalizes further, it will be dealt with. Hipocrite (talk) 15:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Come on.

You know users are allowed to remove warnings - see WP:WARN "remember that any editor -including anonymous IPs- may remove messages at will from their own talk page.". Let it go. Hipocrite (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

No, the problem was that Shovon76 called his nationalistic edits vandalism, when they were actually just a content dispute. If Shovon76 hadn't called the obvious not-vandalism Kashmir edits vandalism, he would have been taken more seriously. Hipocrite (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

It's not vandalism, because he thinks having an encyclopedia that supports his POV is a better encyclopedia. It's disruptive. Hipocrite (talk) 15:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)