User talk:JSR
I have finally put the retirement tag since I expect that life is going to bring new challenges and my energies will be far too depleted for me to edit here regularly. My best to the people who do things by the book here. No doubt I have made mistakes but in general I have tried to follow some basic principles and have come to respect some basic rules. Finally, goodbye before my last message turns out to be a long and rambling one.
| This is JSR's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2 |
|
Great work. I noticed a reassessment request on WP India's Assessment dept page, the top grade the list can get from the WP India is "List". Nominate the article at WP:Featured list, the top grade a list can get in wikipedia. I suggest you initiate a WP:peer review, before the Featured List nomiantion. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again. Sorry to disturb. Pls see my addition on SLS in the Indian inventions article. The refs may not be as great as the others but I believe for now it would suffice. Your input is welcomed there and in this Same language subtitling article I created. Enjoy! Exxoo (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- What do u think about the SLS addition? Do they constitute reliable sources in your opinion? I have also just included Simputer to the list of inventions. Pls have a look to see if it's appropriate. Exxoo (talk) 19:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- No problem JSR. Do one at a time. There's no hurry. I tried but couldn't find any book references for SLS, and as such had to go ahead using weblinks. I fully understand what you mean "bringing into question the article's integrity", but I believe that those links are fine and that's why I'm asking a second opinion from a quality editor like you. As for Simputer I managed to get some pretty good book sources, however I also had to include 2 weblinks as a citation for its current status. You finish your job in the "Education in India" page first, then have a look at these two additions when time's on your side, and advice on the next course of action. Take care. Exxoo (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- SLS - If you wanna insert the books co-authored by Kothari, then please feel free to do so. However I wouldn't recommend citing a source that is authored by the inventor / innovator himself. WP:PSTS says "Wikipedia articles should rely mainly on published reliable secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." Although it doesn't disallow the use of primary source, it's clearly discouraged. And that's why I don't feel comfortable using it.
- Simputer - The description I gave in the article is basically split into 2 parts. The first is the part that talks about its history (e.g. who invented, when etc.). This is sourced from 2 book sources. The second part is about its present use/status. I couldn't source this from books so I had to use news sites. I personally don't think that's a problem because the important part (i.e. about the invention itself) is well sourced.
- Additional sources - Noted them, thanks. Will use it as referencing for any future additions.
- Asbestos - I did a quick search on asbestos and the first confirmed record of the material does not seem to be India. Anyway I'm still researching, and if you have any source that definitively links its earliest mention / use to India, please let me know. What do you think about spoon? Apparently one of the earliest mention comes from the Rig Veda. It looks promising but I'm still doing some more research. If you have any material please share it.
- Another thing is I'm in favour of removing joint innovations e.g. Pati-Salam model, Wilson-Bappu effect etc. because this is not exclusively Indian. Actually for joint contributions I can insert many more but I don't think it is the best for the article. Lets concentrate on solely Indian inventions, innovationa and discoveries for now. What do u think?
- I'm actually out of town right now and I'm sending this from an internet café. Will do a further check up on both as soon as I'm back home. Sorry for the slow response from my side. In the mean time please feel free to make any changes u feel is appropriate. We can discuss if we have differing viewpoints. Exxoo (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
HI JSR, sorry for the silence. I am currently out of my country for holiday. I’ll will take some time to be back. In the mean time please look after the Indian inventions and discoveries page. I have some plans for the page but can only implement once I’m back. It won’t take too long though. I don’t have my laptop with me so access is limited. I gotta use from a cyber café. Take care. Exxoo (talk) 02:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Sure looking. In the meantime, some review adverts of my own. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Random things, in case you forgot, but likely you just haven't gotten around to it
- Girls and castes. You should explain the situation before telling people that they are targeted for extra assistance
- Status of private schools, church schools etc
- Need to explain whether IIT being "important -> more money? more research funding?
- Literacy rates need discussion, initiatives, backwardness in Bihar/UP etc.
- Business partnerships with universities?
- Are there pay degrees in India -> ie can pay more money to get admittance if you fail entrance exams
- Political interference issues? Historical revisionism of textbooks to appease certain groups or whatever...
 | This Cricket WikiProject page is an archive, log collection, or currently inactive page; it is kept primarily for historical interest. |  |
Since there are now a few people writing biographies and writing them on a hard drive before uploading in chunks of 20+ kb, it is probably good to write down future work plans so that two people don't spend ten hours writing something on a hard drive and then kind that the work has been duplicated.
Future plans and progress
[edit]- Blnguyen (talk · contribs)
- Jim Burke (cricketer) - same as Benaud
- Mattinbgn (talk · contribs)
- Warwick Armstrong - at LoCE
- George Giffen - the next one!
- Dweller (talk · contribs) - although I normally work "live", rather than from sandboxes etc
- Invincibles FT
- The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Daniel (talk · contribs)
- General copyediting, no specific articles. Leave me a note on my talk for a general copyedit. Daniel 02:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Phanto282 (talk · contribs)
GACs and FACs
[edit]WP:GAC: Ian Craig and Brian Booth
Invincibles
[edit]Our future featured topic:
Captains
[edit]| Name | Class | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Australian national cricket captains |  FL |
|
| Dave Gregory | Start | |
| Billy Murdoch | Start | |
| Tom Horan | Start | |
| Hugh Massie | Stub | |
| Jack Blackham | Start | |
| Tup Scott | Stub | |
| Percy McDonnell | Stub | |
| George Giffen | Start | |
| Harry Trott | FA |
June 2008 |
| Joe Darling |  GA |
|
| Hugh Trumble | FA |
|
| Monty Noble | Start | |
| Clem Hill | FA |
|
| Syd Gregory | Start | |
| Warwick Armstrong | GA |
|
| Herbie Collins | GA |
|
| Warren Bardsley | Start | |
| Jack Ryder | Start | |
| Bill Woodfull | GA |
|
| Vic Richardson | Start | |
| Don Bradman | FA |
June 2008 |
| Bill Brown | FA |
September 2008 |
| Lindsay Hassett | GA |
|
| Arthur Morris | FA |
|
| Ian Johnson | FA |
July 2008 |
| Ray Lindwall | GA |
|
| Ian Craig | FA |
|
| Richie Benaud | B | |
| Neil Harvey | GA |
|
| Bob Simpson | B | |
| Brian Booth | GA |
|
| Bill Lawry | B | |
| Barry Jarman | Start | |
| Ian Chappell | FA |
|
| Greg Chappell | B | |
| Graham Yallop | Start | |
| Kim Hughes | B | |
| Allan Border | B | |
| Mark Taylor | B | |
| Steve Waugh | B | |
| Adam Gilchrist | FA |
|
| Ricky Ponting | B |
Australian Cricket Hall of Fame
[edit]| Name | Class | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Cricket Hall of Fame | Start | |
| Jack Blackham | Start | |
| Fred Spofforth | Start | |
| Victor Trumper | Start | |
| Clarrie Grimmett | Start | |
| Bill Ponsford | FA |
|
| Donald Bradman | FA |
June 2008 |
| Bill O'Reilly | FA |
|
| Keith Miller | B | |
| Ray Lindwall | GA |
|
| Dennis Lillee | Start | |
| Warwick Armstrong | GA |
|
| Neil Harvey | GA |
|
| Allan Border | B | |
| Bill Woodfull | GA |
|
| Arthur Morris | FA |
|
| Greg Chappell | B | |
| Stan McCabe | GA |
|
| Ian Chappell | FA |
|
| Lindsay Hassett | GA |
|
| Hugh Trumble | FA |
|
| Alan Davidson | GA |
|
| Clem Hill | FA |
|
| Rod Marsh | Start | |
| Bob Simpson | B | |
| Monty Noble | Start | |
| Charlie Macartney | FA |
|
| Richie Benaud | B | |
| George Giffen | Start | |
| Ian Healy | Start | |
| Steve Waugh | B | |
| Garth McKenzie | Start | |
| Bill Lawry | B |
- I read through it and it seems OK for a start. I'm really sorry I cannot help much with the facts because I'm not familiar with education in India; I've never studied there nor have I read much on the topic. However I made some minor changes which if you don't favour you can revert. By the way good job on the article overhaul... actually reconstruction :)!! Exxoo (talk) 13:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- HAve a good trip. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 01:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I went through and made a few correctons, tried to improve the text a little so the English is a little more international while still preserving most of the Indian English usage. There's a lot of over-treferencing here, with nearly every sentence having an in-text citation, but then again there are a lot of stats quoted and they do need to be directly referenced. I'd agree the leading paragrapgh needs to be imprved, with less nubers on the improved recent standards and more on the structure. Mdw0 (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and for your edits everyone. I really appreciate it since I could not do as much as I should have since the last few days. Once again thank you :) JSR 0562 18:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Large numbers
[edit]I noticed you've taken the commas out of all the large numbers. I think personally this makes them a lot more difficult to read and the Manual of Style agrees with me. Are you OK to put them back of should I do it? Mdw0 (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Note
[edit]I'll be there soon. Can you help keep an eye on the SL cricket attack page. One Pakistani user is adding conspiracy theories about India as always. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 07:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- What was it with Geo? YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 01:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Geo has showen the copy of report.User:Yousaf465 (talk)
see Lahore attack talk page
[edit]Here is the link to it.[1].User:Yousaf465 (talk)
 |
User:Yousaf465 (talk) has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
|
and here is the link to google policy [2].User:Yousaf465 (talk)
- Well hard you have to work,if you are related to it in some many ways.User:Yousaf465 (talk)
See also links
[edit]I am not sure I understand the selection criterion for the links in the See also section of History_of_Indian_science_and_technology#See_also article ? Are the listed countries, empires etc chosen for some specific reason, or are they more-or-less random picks from Category:Science and technology by country, Category:History of science and discoveries by region and Category:Science_and_technology_in_China ?
By the way, I added Indian mathematics and Indian astronomy to the see also list since they are parallel overview article that a casual reader, who has not read through the whole article, may find useful. Also, I agree with your view on Vedic science, and added a link to Vedic science only because that page provides further links to related articles. I am fine if these links are left out, and am more curious about the logic behind the current links.
This minor issue aside, I must say I am greatly impressed with the work you have done in this area. Wikipedia can certainly use more editors like you. Regards. Abecedare (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Within the article the {{Science in India}} template has science links that one needs to navigate, including the mathematics and astronomy link. The other links were laid out so that those interested in history of science in general may find other regional articles to enjoy. Vedic science is more of an invented modern concept and is, in my opinion, best left out since it compromises not only the integrity of a science article but may also affect its stability to some extent. Wishing you the best, JSR 0562
- Thanks for your reply.
- I agree that since the science and astronomy links are in the {{Science in India}} template, including them in the see also section serves no purpose. I am also ambivalent about the Vedic science link, since I see how that can be magnet for fringe POV pushers.
- However I am still not convinced that the current links in th See also section are appropriate or relevant. For example, how can we justify linking to articles about Australian, Swedish, Korean, German or Canadian inventions; three links to science in US; or 5 links related to science in China ? I think it would be better to have a blank see also section, but I am not going to revert you or insist on this since this is a minor issue, and it would be better to spend our time developing the article content for now. Such issues can be reexamined once the article is raised to at least the GA status.
- More importantly: What do you think about moving the article to History of Indian science and technology ? It is better to avoid using the ambiguous adjective Indian in article titles (given Wikipedia worldwide audience), and use the "X in India" formulation instead. Any objections to such a move ? Abecedare (talk) 06:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC) You can reply here since I have your talk page watchlisted now.
None at all. In fact, I moved 'Science and technology in ancient India' (original title) to 'History of science and technology in India' on 24 July 2008 since the article dealt with more than just 'ancient history' and extended to both the medieval and colonial eras. It was moved to Science and technology in ancient India by Bhadaniji (25 July 2008). After having discussed with him and after obtaining his consent I moved the article to the present form on 26 July 2008. JSR 0562 06:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Architecture of India
[edit]Hi there. You deleted two sections (Pallavas and Cholas) from Architecture of India without an edit summary. The Cholas section had references and the other had links to UNESCO heritage sites. Was it a mistake? Please explain the reason. (Please reply on this page itself.I will have a watch on it.) --Belasd (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Done. There were a total of 3 citations for the large amount of text I removed. One of the 3 was an unsourced detail while the other lacked anything except the author and the date. I have removed the text due to lack of inline citations and poor quality of unsourced content. Sincerely, JSR 0562 19:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. Me not knowing much about architecture. But I got a little worried seeing a huge deletion on my watchlist. See you around then! -Belasd (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Image arrangement
[edit]Please do not pile up all images at the start of the article that leads to piling up of all "edit" tabs that you see in section titles, in some browsers. Also please do not increase the size of the images unnecessarily, see Forced image size in WP:IMAGE. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I tried adjusting images in architecture of India --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
yousaf465 08:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
yousaf465 08:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Thnaks for citing me
[edit] |
yousaf465 has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
|
you deserve it again.yousaf465
Could you please look at this.[3]What about the above message ?yousaf465
- Thanks.I will also try sometime later on.--yousaf465 21:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
yousaf465 06:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
ITN
[edit]You also deserver this for the merging part.It is a bit difficult job but you did it excellently.
You deserved it.No problemyousaf465
- Web will be a great source.Lead needs to expanded.yousaf465
- No,Problem but you still deserve it you did the messy job.--yousaf465 10:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Indian Cinema
[edit]Hi,
Tamil Cinema is NOT a regional cinema. Tamil Diaspora in Srilanka, Singapore, Malaysia, Canada, South Africa and Australia view Tamil cinema and live Tamil music, though they are different nationals. Also, most of good hindi movies are remade from Tamil. From todays Ghajini to yester generations Engaveetu pillai, most of them are remade. Please dont try to suppress the popularity of tamil cinema by just vandalising this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guru coolguy (talk • contribs) 19:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like user: Guru coolguy left me these compliments. His contributions clearly reveal that he likes adding Tamil cinema to the extent of creating a Hollywood of the east redirect for it. He has been warned on his talk page and these kind of messages further convince me that a break is needed.
- Regards to all, JSR 0562 18:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I would like to point out that, though the article was not well-referenced, a lot of people had spent their time to improve the article and it had separate sections on Tamil Cinema, Bollywood and all. None of those people have taken a long wikibreak after your update. So, why should you? 'Guru coolguy' has not made any major modification on text, only reformatted it. Why will people object against that? It is true that you have put very good work in improving the article, but people will keep on reformatting articles. That is how WP works. Personally, I would request you to reconsider your decision and continue to keep up the good work! Or, otherwise, please come back soon. We need good contributors like you to carry on. Thanks.--GDibyendu (talk) 18:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
You shouldnt retire YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 05:31, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hollywood of the east. Since you had some involvement with the Hollywood of the east redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Redtigerxyz Talk 13:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:060405 prehistoric dentistry vlg9a hmedium.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:060405 prehistoric dentistry vlg9a hmedium.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:2 rupee coin.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2 rupee coin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Sushruta.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Sushruta.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Vbappu.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vbappu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vssun (talk) 02:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Interferometer for measuring refractive index of liquids or solids.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Interferometer for measuring refractive index of liquids or solids.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Invite to WikiConference India 2011
[edit]
| Hi JSR,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
|---|
Possibly unfree File:India antarctica station maitri.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:India antarctica station maitri.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problems with File:Sector-irc.jpg
[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Sector-irc.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imd.gov.in/section/satmet/dynamic/insatsector-irc.htm. As a copyright violation, File:Sector-irc.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Sector-irc.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Sector-irc.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Sector-irc.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Sector-irc.jpg.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Sector-irc.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Indian scientists
[edit]
Template:Indian scientists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!