User talk:Kmorganmoven

August 2018

Hello, I'm Aspening. I noticed that in this edit to Movenbank, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 23:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Movenbank. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.

Hello, Kmorganmoven. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Movenbank, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Hello Kmorganmoven. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Movenbank, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kmorganmoven. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kmorganmoven|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 23:51, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Home Lander (talk) 02:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Movenbank. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Movenbank shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am refraining from reporting you to the administrators. (Somebody else may beat me to it, however.) Let me try to be crystal-clear, since you don't seem to have taken any of the above warnings to heart. Please:

Don't edit Movenbank.
Read WP:PROMO
Read WP:COI
Read WP:PAID
Read WP:PEACOCK
Read WP:CITE
Read WP:3RR
Repeat to yourself: "An encyclopedia is not a place to use press-release language such as 'Moven's technology solutions delivers an advice-driven, AI-augmented Personal Financial Experience'"
If, after all the above, you think the article could be improved, raise the issue at its talk page.

I am sorry to be blunt, but you should have taken the time to read the above already. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 02:45, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]