User talk:Kletetschka

I am personally acquainted with both Gunther Kletetschka and Robert Young. I know for a fact that Gunther is not Robert. Gunther is an accomplished scientist who works for NASA at the Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. He is the author or co-author of about 20 scientific articles, at least two of which are on aging. If you compare pictures of Gunther with those of Robert, it is obvious that they are not the same person. Pictures of Gunther can be seen at http://lep694.gsfc.nasa.gov/gunther/gunther/education.html, http://lep694.gsfc.nasa.gov/gunther/gunther/positions.html, and http://www-691.gsfc.nasa.gov/vitae/gkletetschka.html. A picture of Robert Young can be found at http://www.grg.org/Calment4A.html and search for gibson.

Because of the intense dislike that some administrators have of Robert Young, they immediately jump to the conclusion that anyone who supports him must be his sockpuppet. Certainly any genuine sockpuppet should be banned from Wikipedia, but administrators should exercise considerably more restraint than they have in making unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry. I, too, was a victim of a similar rush to judgment and had to prove my innocence to get unblocked. To her credit BrownHairedGirl then apologized for her mistake. More judicious exercise of administrative power would make apologies unnecessary.

Accusing someone of being a sockpuppet with no more evidence than their support of someone opposed by an administrator is contrary to the spirit of the Wikipedia policy of "No Personal Attacks." This policy states, "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Nobody likes abuse." The policy on Civility states that, "Being rude, insensitive or petty makes people upset and stops Wikipedia from working well." Under the admonition to "Assume good faith" the Guidelines state, "Unless there is strong evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it." Finally, "Please do not bite the newcomers." "Many new contributors lack knowledge about Wikipedia policies. But always understand that new contributors are prospective "members" and are therefore our most valuable resource." Administrators should adhere to these policies more rigorously.

There is nothing improper or unethical about a person joining Wikipedia to support someone who they feel has been attacked or maligned. Frequently these individuals have better first-hand knowledge about the person under attack than those who are conducting the attack.

I hope that a better spirit of moderation and mutual respect will prevail in this forum. StanPrimmer 02:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Longevity and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, JJB 02:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC) I have been blocked from contributing to WIKI edits. I want to ask what do I need to do to become unblocked. Kletetschka (talk) 12:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

Your name has been mentioned in recent evidence for an arbitration case filed on 2010-11-18. You were not originally named as a party, but I am sending this notice proforma to editors named in evidence, before the workshop period closes. If you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity/Workshop#General discussion, or elsewhere on that page or the case's four talk pages. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, JJB 21:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kletetschka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to edit WIKI pages, Please unblock me

Accept reason:

have verified via email that this is Dr. Gunther Kletetschka, and thus not a sockpuppet of Robert Young. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you this Kletetschka? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is me.. Can you help me to get unblocked?

I'm not sure I understand the circumstances of your 2007 block, but it should be relatively easy to prove you aren't Robert Young. I'll send an email to the address on that profile page... you reply to it, and then we'll have solid evidence that you are yourself and not anyone else. Does that work for you? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd... the email bounced back to me as "user unknown." Is the address on that profile correct? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I dont work at NASA any more. I finished two years ago. My profile age is here: http://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/kletetschka/

Thanks! I sent a message to the first email, the Charles University one. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you should be able to edit now. Welcome to Wikipedia! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that all that stuff is long past, but just in case ... it would be a good idea to avoid the subject of Robert Young, and not to take advice from him about editing, but instead, decide for yourself what articles you'd like to improve.. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kletetschka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Thank you

May 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Superparamagnetism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Superparamagnetism was changed by Kletetschka (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92783 on 2015-05-31T09:29:22+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

King of the free lords moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, King of the free lords, is a mess and not yet fit for mainspace. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marussi tensor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Marussi tensor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. A a s i m 17:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EIGEN 6C4 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, EIGEN 6C4, does not explainthecontext dso readerscan tell what it isa bout. . It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gravity aspects moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gravity aspects, does not have informationas written to remain published. It needs context--and possibly should be combined with the article EIGEN C64 ). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EIGEN 6C4

Hello, Kletetschka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EIGEN 6C4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gravity aspects

Hello, Kletetschka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gravity aspects".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kotuykanskaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kotuykanskaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotuykanskaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]